Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998

Your ignorance is showing.


5 posted on 08/30/2006 6:23:21 AM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: kalee; Irish_Thatcherite
It's not ignorance.

vladimir998 is the poster child for arrogant Roman Catholic bigotry, and he learned every bit of it in that church. The bigotry he displays should give great pause to anyone considering swimming the Tiber.

6 posted on 08/30/2006 8:15:35 AM PDT by Clint Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: kalee

Actually, many people could say that the Catholic Church has survived without bishops, since most of ours have been so spineless. But bishops are important; if you accept Anglican bishops as valid (which I am assuming you do), do you have any ideas on this subject?


10 posted on 08/30/2006 10:16:56 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: kalee

No, it would be ignorance to assume the succession of bishops continued after the sixteenth century among the Anglicans. This issue has already been decided, definitively, over a century ago. Ignorance would say otherwise.


12 posted on 08/30/2006 2:02:11 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson