Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rosh Hashanah and the Second Coming
The B'rit Chadasha Pages | 9/20/06 | Michael D. Bugg

Posted on 09/20/2006 10:14:32 AM PDT by Buggman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 541 next last
To: Dr. Eckleburg; topcat54; kerryusama04; DouglasKC
The universal (catholic) church has interpreted the NT accounts for 2 millennia accurately regarding the change of the weekly sabbath from the last day to the first day.

I would love to see their scriptural proof for this display of false doctrine.

461 posted on 09/30/2006 5:35:35 PM PDT by Diego1618
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: Diego1618; DouglasKC; kerryusama04; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; jude24
The point I am making is that Apollos is in the synagogue.....worshiping [speaking with great fervor and teaching about Jesus accurately] but knowing only of the baptism of John.

How could he be speaking about Jesus accurately if Priscilla and Aquila had to take him aside privately?

Who was he worshipping of he only knew the baptism of John?

Are we reading the same texts?

The point being, of course, that what was decribed here was not Christian worship, but the worship of apostate Jews to whom folks like Paul, and Aquila and Priscilla, and Apollos reasoned with about the Christ. They didn't go into the synagogue to worship. They went in to preach Christ to the unbelieving Jews.

I realize your presuppositions are preventing you from seeing these facts in the text, but they are there.

If you wish to keep worshipping by the shadows of the older, decayed covenant, that's fine by me. The church has always had its quirky sects.

462 posted on 09/30/2006 6:30:35 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Diego1618; Dr. Eckleburg; kerryusama04; DouglasKC
I would love to see their scriptural proof for this display of false doctrine.

So then you admit you know nothing of the historical Christian arguments from Scripture given over the last 2 millennia?

463 posted on 09/30/2006 6:50:59 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: topcat54; Diego1618; kerryusama04; Buggman
As far as we can tell, this was not church. It was an apostate Jewish synagogue were Paul was preaching the gospel of salvation thorugh Jesus Christ, and where some gentiles came to hear his message.
Paul was preaching on the sabbath because that was the custom of the Jews. The gentiles came out to hear Paul on the sabbath because that was his customary day to preach to the apostate Jews.

Nice try. The bottom line is that there was no such thing as Christians throwing out the sabbath and worshipping/revering a different day. If so, this would have been the prime time for God to reveal it through scripture.

Here we have non-jews, gentiles, being converted by the preaching of Paul. When they ask to be preached to the next sabbath, does Paul say "Ummm...you're not Jews. Us Christians worship on the first day of the week." Nope. Paul preaches to gentiles, non-jews, on the sabbath BECAUSE that IS the commanded day of assembly by the almighty eternal God. It IS a commandment of God. It's ludicrous to think that Paul or anyone else would just toss out a commandment of God that was part of history, culture, and tradition without so much as a whimper of protest from anyone.

464 posted on 09/30/2006 6:57:35 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; topcat54; Diego1618; Buggman
You have to wonder why any Christian would not embrace the Sunday Sabbath as being illustrative of the first day of a new existence for mankind.
"Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." -- 2 Corinthians 5:17

I have to wonder why any Christian would deliberately disobey a commandment of the living God and instead embrace a non-biblical tradition:

1Jo 5:3 For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.

465 posted on 09/30/2006 7:02:43 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: topcat54
So then you admit you know nothing of the historical Christian arguments from Scripture given over the last 2 millennia?

No, I do not admit that. I would like to see the scriptures.....or Papal Bull that the Magisterium has used to pull the wool over the eyes of the people. The exact scripture they used must have been twisted so far out of shape to be barely recognizable. The Papal Bull.....well.....I suppose it was a Papal Bull.

The Sabbath is spoken of 126 times in the Old Testament, 62 times in the New. The first day of the week is mentioned eight times in scripture....not once in a sacred manner. The first day of the week is now the Catholic Sabbath. Go figure!

The Papacy had indeed fulfilled Daniel 7:25.

466 posted on 09/30/2006 10:01:33 PM PDT by Diego1618
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Buggman
With all respect, I think the real thing which bothers you is that you personally abandoned Yeshua for the teachings of the rabbis, and it makes you uncomfortable to see Him in the Torah and the oldest traditions of the Jewish people.

Lol. I'm sure its more settling for you to assume this. Yet if I could, as you do, see him in the Torah. (seeing him in the oldest Jewish traditions is your leap of faith) why would I have abandoned belief in his deity? Oh ya thats right if I'm not blinded and deaf there must be something sinister afloat. There's an attitude that's brand new. /sarcasm. You may parade around these thread in front of Protestants and Catholics wearing your Kepha but your attitude toward Jews is in reality not much different at all.

467 posted on 09/30/2006 10:53:06 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: topcat54; Diego1618; DouglasKC; kerryusama04; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg
Hmmmm....I don't quite understand this argument of worshiping on Saturday or Sunday. It seems to me that Jesus did away with worshiping in one set location, on one set day.

Seems to me our Lord and Paul is saying that our worship is our service. There is no need for tabernacles, synogues, etc. Paul apparently was teaching people to worship contrary to what the Law which tells me he was not following the Jewish traditions.

This doesn't negate believers from coming together, and while worship is a part of coming together it is not the purpose. The purpose of believers coming together is for their edification and to partake of the Lord's Supper:

I can find no scriptural reference for believers specifically coming together at a set place and time for a ceremonial worship. In fact scriptures indicate our service and dedication to be our worship. This is in line with the Old Testament:


468 posted on 10/01/2006 1:10:43 AM PDT by HarleyD ("Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures" Luk 24:45)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; topcat54; Diego1618; kerryusama04; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg
Hmmmm....I don't quite understand this argument of worshiping on Saturday or Sunday. It seems to me that Jesus did away with worshiping in one set location, on one set day.

Jesus did do away with worshipping in one set location. Nobody is arguing that. But you added "one set day".

Joh 4:20 Our fathers worshiped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.
Joh 4:21 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.
Joh 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.
Joh 4:23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. Joh 4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

Location. Location. Location. And note, "in truth". God is truth. God's commandments, including the 4th, is truth.

Seems to me our Lord and Paul is saying that our worship is our service. There is no need for tabernacles, synogues, etc. Paul apparently was teaching people to worship contrary to what the Law which tells me he was not following the Jewish traditions.
Act 18:12-13 But while Gallio was proconsul of Achaia, the Jews with one accord rose up against Paul and brought him before the judgment seat, saying, "This man persuades men to worship God contrary to the law."

Paul was ACCUSED of teaching contrary to the law...and if he did then it was the manmade laws, the non-scriptural laws and customs that evolved around judaism. But did Paul violate scripture? Let him speak in his own defense:

Act 24:13 Neither can they prove the things whereof they now accuse me.
Act 24:14 But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:

Paul believed ALL things in the law and prophets. The 4th commandment, the sabbath commandment IS written in the law and prophets. God, through the mouth of Paul, in holy scripture, is saying that he believes the sabbath of God. Why don't you?

This doesn't negate believers from coming together, and while worship is a part of coming together it is not the purpose. The purpose of believers coming together is for their edification and to partake of the Lord's Supper:

Paul said:

Heb 10:24 And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works:
Heb 10:25 Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.

NOT forsaking assembling together. When do you suppose, in the bible, that God specifically commands that we assemble together for worship? When are we not supposed to forsake?

Lev 23:2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, Concerning the feasts of the LORD, which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts.
Lev 23:3 Six days shall work be done: but the seventh day is the sabbath of rest, a holy convocation; ye shall do no work therein: it is the sabbath of the LORD in all your dwellings.
Lev 23:4 These are the feasts of the LORD, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons.

The author of Hebrews, thought to be Paul, who believes all the law and prophets,is specifically telling the followers of Jesus Christ NOT to forsake ASSEMBLING together. The only time they were ever commanded by God to assemble together was on God's holy days, including the weekly sabbath. That's what he is instructing them, and us, not to forsake.

469 posted on 10/01/2006 5:25:53 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; topcat54; Diego1618; DouglasKC; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg
Hmmmm....I don't quite understand this argument of worshiping on Saturday or Sunday. It seems to me that Jesus did away with worshiping in one set location, on one set day.

Worshipping every day is noble and I personally think we all do this when we say our prayers and such. I heard that John Ascroft had prayer meetings before work when he as AG. We should all be so fortunate as to have a place of work so friendly to worship of God. Those of us who keep the Sabbath in accordance with the scriptures worship God as often as we can as well. However, the volumes of information provided us in the scriptures indicate that God does indeed want everyone to keep His Commandments.

snip

I like to save the red color for the words of Christ.

1Sa 15:22-23 Samuel said, "Has the LORD as much delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices As in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, And to heed than the fat of rams. For rebellion is as the sin of divination, And insubordination is as iniquity and idolatry. Because you have rejected the word of the LORD, He has also rejected you from being king."

To obey what? God, men, or our own convictions?

470 posted on 10/01/2006 8:36:39 AM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: topcat54; Diego1618; DouglasKC; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; jude24
Your "proof" amounts to nothing. The universal (catholic) church has interpreted the NT accounts for 2 millennia accurately regarding the change of the weekly sabbath from the last day to the first day. A few cults have opposed this view, but their exegetical efforts have amounted to straw.

Epistle of Barnabas, XV, 8-9

The present sabbaths are not acceptable to me, but that which I have made, in which I will give rest to all things and make the beginning of an eighth day, that is the beginning of another world. Wherefore we also celebrate with gladness the eighth day.

TC, I have posted this one to you before, yet you persist. This shows with absolute clarity that the ECF were keeping the Sabbath. It also shows, for the benefit of our Catholic friends, that at least this guy believed that he had the power to change stuff. Readers, please pay careful attention, as the author says the present Sabbaths - plura. They were keeping the holy days as well. Also pay close attention that he writes that the Sabbaths were unacceptable to him, it mentions nothing of scripture or God's will.

There is much debate as to whether this author is referencing the 8th day as being the 8th millenia after the 1000 years or if he is referencing the 8th day of the Hellenists, which as you may know, was Sunday - the venerable day of the sun, not the venerable day of the Son.

471 posted on 10/01/2006 9:17:06 AM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04; Diego1618; DouglasKC; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; jude24
TC, I have posted this one to you before, yet you persist. This shows with absolute clarity that the ECF were keeping the Sabbath.

You are delirious. It shows no such thing. The contrast in Barnabas is between the practices of the apostate Jews ("Your present sabbaths") and the practice of the church ("we also celebrate").

If you actually read the entire argument from Barnabas you would see this.

Further, He says to them [the Jews], “Your new moons and your Sabbath I cannot endure.” Ye perceive how He speaks: Your [the Jews] present Sabbaths are not acceptable to Me, but that is which I have made, [namely this,] when, giving rest to all things, I shall make a beginning of the eighth day, that is, a beginning of another world. Wherefore, also, we [the church] keep the eighth day with joyfulness, the day also on which Jesus rose again from the dead.. And when He had manifested Himself, He ascended into the heavens.
Barnabas was the earliest of the extra-biblical church fathers who wrote on this subject. It is clear that by his time that the church had established worship on the first day on apostolic authority, as opposed to the apostate Jews who continued to worship on the last day.
472 posted on 10/01/2006 10:11:10 AM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: topcat54; Diego1618; DouglasKC; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; jude24

What is you source for this document and did you insert the stuff in the [brackets]? At any rate, the author still confessed "not acceptable to me" and "that which I have made". It is clear that his argument is from the position of himself and NOT from the position of "Thus saith the LORD".


473 posted on 10/01/2006 10:17:16 AM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: topcat54
You are delirious.

Do NOT make it personal!
474 posted on 10/01/2006 10:18:30 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC; kerryusama04; Diego1618; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; jude24
Nice try.

You're still grasping , and prove again that you do not understand these passages.

Let's look at another to see the extent of your error:

And it happened, while Apollos was at Corinth, that Paul, having passed through the upper regions, came to Ephesus. And finding some disciples he said to them, ... When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied. Now the men were about twelve in all.

And he went into the synagogue and spoke boldly for three months, reasoning and persuading concerning the things of the kingdom of God. But when some were hardened and did not believe, but spoke evil of the Way before the multitude, he departed from them and withdrew the disciples, reasoning daily in the school of Tyrannus. And this continued for two years, so that all who dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus, both Jews and Greeks. (Acts 19:1,2,5-10)

Note the progression. Paul goes to Ephesus and finds some disciples (not in the synagogue). He preaches the fullness of the gospel to them and they are baptized (again, not in the synagogue). Then he enters into the synagogue to reason with the apostate Jews. After they refuse to listen to the gospel, he leaves and continues his ministry among the believing Jews and gentiles in "school of Tyrannus". The apostate Jews are left in their synagogue to continue to worship according to old covenant shadows.

Again, more proof that synagogue worship is not the worship of Paul and the other disciples.

475 posted on 10/01/2006 10:22:20 AM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04; Diego1618; DouglasKC; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; jude24
You can find it all here just as I quoted.
476 posted on 10/01/2006 10:24:16 AM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04; topcat54; Dr. Eckleburg; Buggman
At any rate, the author still confessed "not acceptable to me" and "that which I have made". It is clear that his argument is from the position of himself and NOT from the position of "Thus saith the LORD".

If you actually read the source document, and not just some Seventh-Day Adventist pull-quote, you would have seen that the context was an exegesis of Old Testament passages indicating the supercession of the Sabbath. He explicitly was referencing Divine quotations.

Moreover concerning the Sabbath likewise it is written in the Ten Words, in which He spake to Moses face to face on Mount Sinai; And ye shall hallow the Sabbath of the Lord with pure hands and with a pure heart.
And in another place He saith; If my sons observe the Sabbath then I will bestow My mercy upon them.
Of the Sabbath He speaketh in the beginning of the creation; And God made the works of His hands in six days, and He ended on the seventh day, and rested on it, and He hallowed it.
Give heed, children, what this meaneth; He ended in six days. He meaneth this, that in six thousand years the Lord shall bring all things to an end; for the day with Him signifyeth a thousand years; and this He himself beareth me witness, saying; Behold, the day of the Lord shall be as a thousand years. Therefore, children, in six days, that is in six thousand years, everything shall come to an end.
And He rested on the seventh day. this He meaneth; when His Son shall come, and shall abolish the time of the Lawless One, and shall judge the ungodly, and shall change the sun and the moon and the stars, then shall he truly rest on the seventh day.
Yea and furthermore He saith; Thou shalt hallow it with pure hands and with a pure heart. If therefore a man is able now to hallow the day which God hallowed, though he be pure in heart, we have gone utterly astray.
But if after all then and not till then shall we truly rest and hallow it, when we shall ourselves be able to do so after being justified and receiving the promise, when iniquity is no more and all things have been made new by the Lord, we shall be able to hallow it then, because we ourselves shall have been hallowed first.
Finally He saith to them; Your new moons and your Sabbaths I cannot away with. Ye see what is His meaning ; it is not your present Sabbaths that are acceptable [unto Me], but the Sabbath which I have made, in the which, when I have set all things at rest, I will make the beginning of the eighth day which is the beginning of another world.
Wherefore also we keep the eighth day for rejoicing, in the which also Jesus rose from the dead, and having been manifested ascended into the heavens.

-- Epistle of Barnabas, XV.i-xv (Lightfoot translation).

The Church very early on had all-but-ceased engaging in Sabbatarian worship. Such is the invertible conclusion of any fair-minded historian.

477 posted on 10/01/2006 10:25:26 AM PDT by jude24 ("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04; Diego1618; DouglasKC; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; jude24
Sorry to confuse. Some of the brackets are mine but are fully supported inferences based on the contextual evidence.

Read it for yourself to see if you can come to a different interpretation.

478 posted on 10/01/2006 10:26:56 AM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Sunday morning AMEN, Jude.


479 posted on 10/01/2006 10:51:03 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: topcat54; Diego1618; DouglasKC; whipitgood; Buggman; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; jude24
You can find it all here just as I quoted.

You inserted the stuff in the brackets.

From the link: Wherefore, also, we keep the eighth day with joyfulness, the day also on which Jesus rose again from the dead.1670

This plainly says they kept both the Sabbath and their 8th day. If only they had a whole Bible like we do today...

480 posted on 10/01/2006 10:51:20 AM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 541 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson