To: Sam Ketcham
If you think that contraception doesn't lead to a demand for abortion, you should take that up with the Supreme Court, because they apparently think otherwise, since they cited their
Griswold decision in justifying
Roe.
And I have no idea what you think this has to do with priests marrying. No Christians at all approved of contraception before 1930, and plenty of them had married ministers.
3 posted on
11/24/2006 8:03:37 PM PST by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
To: Campion
So, where is the scientific study to back your statements. 1930, well I was born after that. Guess the change of heart by the Ministers didn't affect my parents.
4 posted on
11/24/2006 10:36:54 PM PST by
Sam Ketcham
(Amnesty means vote dilution, increased taxes to bring them UP to the Poverty Level!)
To: Campion
Sorry to hit your post again, but... "The Supreme Court"... cited by a Freeper as an Authority... especially in its dealing with Abortion.
Do not mistake it, I am against Abortion, but I think contraception BEFORE PREGNANCY is a personal issue. I do think contraception is a decision between two people with mutual, not one sided agreement. Abortion or the morning after pill is murder. A big difference.
5 posted on
11/24/2006 10:44:23 PM PST by
Sam Ketcham
(Amnesty means vote dilution, increased taxes to bring them UP to the Poverty Level!)
To: Campion
Interesting. My last post in itself negates the generality of the Bishop's statement. Oh, well...
6 posted on
11/24/2006 10:46:34 PM PST by
Sam Ketcham
(Amnesty means vote dilution, increased taxes to bring them UP to the Poverty Level!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson