Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Character of God’s Words [Septuagint is a Fraud]
The Dean Burgon Society ^ | July, 2005 | H. D. Williams, M.D.

Posted on 01/06/2007 7:13:58 AM PST by Titanites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 601-615 next last
To: redgolum

"Probably they see the differences in the KJV and the LXX, and suspect the tricky Greeks hoodwinked them :)."

Undoubtedly. Beware of Greeks bearing gifts! Septuagint=Spiritual Trojan Horse! :)


61 posted on 01/06/2007 2:00:46 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dangus
The Waldensians where a very interesting group. There were similar movements (tho not connected) all through the Middle Ages. As you said, they were not Reformed in theology ("Protestant" is to broad a term), and don't fit well with any current definition.
62 posted on 01/06/2007 2:01:36 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

You're welcome!

"Revelation" would have been circulated as a single book (scroll or codex, depending on where it was copied) and eventually included in various collections of Christian writings, before the canon was finalized by the Council of Carthage.

The chance that the references to adding or deleting had anything to do with modern compilations of the Old Testament would be ... well, not zero, but pretty close!


63 posted on 01/06/2007 2:11:28 PM PST by Tax-chick (What's this we have now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dangus
It's worse than that! The Jews convened the Council of Jamnia in part to quell Messianic fervor which they blamed for the Christian problem, as well as the vengence of the Romans against the Zealot revolt, which led to the destruction of the Temple. Therefore, one must keep in mind that the Jews' problem with the deuterocanonical books (called apocrypha by Luther as a deliberate attempt to mislead people) was that they prophecised Christ in the most precise manner!

Oh sure. Rabbis all met in Jambia so that they could deliberately alter the accuracy of their own writings. When are you people going to grow up?

64 posted on 01/06/2007 2:25:44 PM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
The Ten Commandments are from the hand of God. The rest, divinely inspired or not, is from the hand of man.

Well, actually, the 10 Commandments are from the hand of man, too, unless the early manuscripts had "See Picture 2" with photos of the tablets.

65 posted on 01/06/2007 2:27:33 PM PST by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant

Well, they probably didn't meet in Jamnia and establish a canon. But about that time they began to prefer the Hebrew Sciptures in a way they hadn't before. The messianic movements were a product of Hellenistic times and the apocalyptic bookswritten in Greek(or Aramaic) included in the Septuagent supported the messianic interpretation of Scripture. Accepting the book of Daniel was about as far as they were willing to go.


66 posted on 01/06/2007 2:38:46 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Oh sure. Rabbis all met in Jambia so that they could deliberately alter the accuracy of their own writings.

In an odd turn of fate, I'll agree with you on this one.

67 posted on 01/06/2007 2:42:13 PM PST by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Sorry -- but the teacher in me is coming out.

**weren't not**

??


68 posted on 01/06/2007 2:52:23 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

***it doesn't have all the books! LOL!***

Actually it did in the first 1611 translations. You can still get Cambridge KJVs with it in it and you can also order it separate in a small booklet form. Nelson publishers' version of the 1611 also has it in it.


69 posted on 01/06/2007 2:59:55 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dangus

"Therefore, one must keep in mind that the Jews' problem with the deuterocanonical books (called apocrypha by Luther as a deliberate attempt to mislead people) was that they prophecised Christ in the most precise manner!:

I see it a little differently.

I don't read much greater precision about Christ in the Deuterocanonica than in the rest of the Bible, particularly Isaiah, the Psalms and, to a degree, Daniel.

I think the Jews at Jamnia rejected the Septuagint primarily because it was GREEK, and the Jews in post-revolt mode were EXTREMELY bigoted and racist, and rejected anything that wasn't Hebrew as unacceptable (even though the Jews themselves didn't actually SPEAK Hebrew themselves anymore, and hadn't for centuries).

I think Martin Luther's problem with the Deuterocanonica is entirely contained in one passage of one book only: 2 Maccabbees. I don't have the text immediately at hand, but essentially there is a section in which the Maccabeans have a sacrifice of atonement for the sins of the dead, and specifically so that the sins in which those dead died would be forgiven by God.
Obviously, this is prayers for the dead, and the offerings made to the Temple for the souls of the dead, and the forgiveness of the sins of the dead hoped for by this pious exercise, is Biblical authority for the efficacy of INDULGENCES!!!
Luther couldn't abide that, and HAD to get rid of 2 Maccabbees, specifically. Jamnia was the excuse.

Luther also wanted to get rid of James, because of "faith without works is dead" - the NECESSITY of works offended his theology. But he didn't have a Jamnia to rely upon for the NT.


70 posted on 01/06/2007 3:00:29 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

yes, but also the wording specifically used by John " adding or subtracting words from this SCROLL...", which is of course the medium upon the text was written. specifically, then, John is arguing that no-one should change the words in the Book of Revelation itself.


71 posted on 01/06/2007 3:01:13 PM PST by haole (John 10 30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic

****So, the protestants relied upon those who rejected Jesus to decide what is and isn't Christian belief. It can not be said that is an uninteresting idea.****


It should also be remembered that the SHEPHERD OF HERMAS is also in one the Greek bibles found in Sinai in the 1850's but is still not found in either the Catholic or KJV versions of the bible.


72 posted on 01/06/2007 3:06:22 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13

Luther had qualms with "praying for the dead", since he felt that Faith ALone saved oneself, and here, in someone praying for you, would not fit in his mis-guided interpretation.
the whole New Testament is filled with people asking Jesus to heal / cure / drive out demons - but not for themselves! the paralytic who was lowered thru the rood of Peter's house- "Jesus, seeing THEIR faith...", the father of the boy with demons ( you think the boy with demons is going to ask Jesus to cure himself? ), the centurion who asked that his servant be cured, the father of the sick girl...etc.
protestants want to make Christianity into a "Me & Jesus alone" type faith, and leave out the rest of humanity.


73 posted on 01/06/2007 3:08:46 PM PST by haole (John 10 30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
When are you people going to grow up?

************

Good heavens.

74 posted on 01/06/2007 3:13:30 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: the808bass

Wow. Long time no see. Where you been hiding?


75 posted on 01/06/2007 3:23:45 PM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: haole

Good point!


76 posted on 01/06/2007 4:05:46 PM PST by Tax-chick (What's this we have now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic
So the Spirit of Truth guides the Church in all truth, not an individual person.

I concede and suspect that the Spirit of Truth does not reside in most Catholics...That would explain why God's word (the bible) takes the back seat to your religious tradition...

But for many of us outside of your religion, the Spirit of Truth resides within us and guides us...

Rom 8:8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
Rom 8:9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.
Rom 8:10 And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.
Rom 8:11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

But do not fret...The Spirit of Truth is available to all Catholics as well...Call on Jesus...Confess to Jesus to being a sinner and confess to Jesus that you need a Savior and ask Jesus to save you...He will fill you with the Spirit of Truth...Praise God...And he will give you assurance of eternal salvation...

77 posted on 01/06/2007 4:07:07 PM PST by Iscool (There will be NO peace on earth, NOR good will toward men UNTIL there is Glory to God in the Highest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

oh enlightened one! please tell me, if i sin, but believe in Jesus, have Faith in HIm, will i be saved?


78 posted on 01/06/2007 4:11:05 PM PST by haole (John 10 30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Isn't the author of Revelations referring to adding or subtracting words from the Book of Revelations, rather than referring to adding or subtracting from the other books of the Bible ?

You spose then that God is alright with people adding and subtracting to Matthew, or Romans and still calling it the word of God???

79 posted on 01/06/2007 4:11:48 PM PST by Iscool (There will be NO peace on earth, NOR good will toward men UNTIL there is Glory to God in the Highest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: haole
oh enlightened one! please tell me, if i sin, but believe in Jesus, have Faith in HIm, will i be saved?

Ha...What is this, a trick question??? The devils believe, and they tremble...

Nope...You must call on 'HIM', confess to 'HIM' that you need a Savior and ask 'HIM' to save you...And He will...

80 posted on 01/06/2007 4:26:00 PM PST by Iscool (There will be NO peace on earth, NOR good will toward men UNTIL there is Glory to God in the Highest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 601-615 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson