Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six Physical Factors That Affect Your Worship Service (Rick Warren)
The Christian Post ^ | Thu, Mar. 08 2007 10:04 AM ET | Rick Warren

Posted on 03/09/2007 3:53:04 PM PST by Terriergal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last
To: Terriergal
I was thinking that the part you quoted was actually your writing. It helps to vary the text style so we can tell

Oh BTW it helps to read the entire article then one would know what's a quote and what's a post. :>)

41 posted on 03/10/2007 6:51:04 AM PST by WKB (Fred "YES", Duncan "yes", Newt "yes", Mitt "maybe", Rino Rudy "no way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

"Thank God for Rick Warren threads."

If it wasn't for that devil Rick look at the cottage industry of critics that would not be in existence. All of the gossipers would have to start looking at family, friends and neighbors again.


42 posted on 03/10/2007 6:58:12 AM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
..postmodern / emerging church, which looks upon mankind as consumers rather than sinners--consumers to whom you must market the message.

Warren is a very controversial figure and I do not agree with many of his methods. My cousin and his wife attended Saddleback for a brief time.

43 posted on 03/10/2007 7:04:22 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
All I know about Rick Warren I've learned by reading Free Republic. For the most part I think that his book "The Purpose Driven Life" is harmless and trite. However lately he has gone off the deep end by his political nonsense. Now, when I read tripe like this and know that he is somehow convincing other pastors that the key to growing a church is in doing an environmental study on the shape of the room, or adjusting the air conditioner or getting a fancy microphone, I am convinced now that what he is doing is looking for wolves to join his flock and devour his sheep.

If someone actually chooses a church because of the shape of the room or the lighting, then I would not want that person being a regular member of my church. His concern over making visitors comfortable makes me uncomfortable.

If a non-Christian comes to your church, you want to make them feel welcome, but you sure don't want to make them "comfortable." They need to be shaking in their pew from the fear of God and if they vow never to return after the message, then the message was just as effective as if they'd fallen on their knees and surrendered to God.

Only solid born again Christians should be feeling "comfortable" in a church service. Wolves need to feel out of place among the sheep. If they feel at home, then they are free to devour the sheep at their leisure.

If this is an example of the tripe you find in "The Purpose Driven Church", then it is a book to be avoided. Any pastor that follows this kind of silly advice thinking he can magically grow his church by using a professional interior decorator needs to surrender the pulpit to someone who knows that it is the Word of God which brings people to faith and not the wallpaper.

44 posted on 03/10/2007 7:17:13 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

The importance of an "enviromental impact study" came home to my church when we had two families visit in consecutive weeks. One was a real estate agent and the other a plumbing contractor. The fathers walked through the facilities to see how we maintained our stewardship of them as an indication of how we would look at the most important treasures that God had given them to be stewards of; their children.

They both pointed out mold up in the eaves that had been there for years, poor flourescent lighting in the sunday school classes, the smell of mold in the rug in the nursery and the poor lighting in the sanctuary that was not conducive to following along in the scriptures, poor lighting in the entry way and the faded paint in the fellowship hall. Both joined the church before any work was done but we realized from their imput that we were taking the facilities for granted for our comfort and convenience rather than thinking of them as as much a witness to our God as our piety. So often we will accept a "well they tried" atmosphere in worship instead of excellence, something we would never accept in our occupations or from our kids or in our home, but in church, well, that's what God has given us as if we expected Him to come and paint the hallway walls.


45 posted on 03/10/2007 7:44:40 AM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan
That does not appear to be what Warren was referencing. Had he couched the article in terms of "stewardship" instead of trying to make "visitors" feel at home, then I would not have had such a nasty reaction to his article. But the thrust of Warren's article was not in being a good steward of the building, but in attempting to impress visitors with how chic the church is. His idea that you can create a revival by increasing the wattage on the lights is assinine.

His emphasis was not on excellence, but on appearances. Things like this really stand out as not only trite, but just plain secular:

"Personal space is highly valued in our society. This is why box seats are prized at stadiums. If people are forced to sit too close to each other, they get very uncomfortable. There should be at least 18 inches between people if you're using chairs and 21 inches between people if you're using pews."

To me Warren has turned into a big windbag. Maybe if he lost 50 pounds and got rid of that silly goatee, he might be taken a little more seriously. But then that would be appealing to people's senses. Obviously he doesn't think that having a trim fit pastor who is a good steward of the body he was given, is as important as having a good wireless microphone so that he can dance around the stage and show off his spare tires and keep the attention of people who would prefer to fall asleep in their comfortable pews.

46 posted on 03/10/2007 8:00:56 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: WKB

no problem. :-)


47 posted on 03/10/2007 8:27:13 AM PST by Terriergal (All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan

My family, friends and neighbors don't preach publicly. Well at least most of them. I've called my brother in law on the carpet once, too. But he's grown up since then and changed his attitude, and is now a non-compromising preacher.

Unlike Rick Warren.


48 posted on 03/10/2007 8:29:38 AM PST by Terriergal (All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WKB

I did -- I just forgot that that line was from it.


49 posted on 03/10/2007 8:30:12 AM PST by Terriergal (All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner

What'd you think of Saddleback?


50 posted on 03/10/2007 8:30:37 AM PST by Terriergal (All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
"Comfy" churches are a pretty poor testimony to us.

I had someone on the north side of Chicago say that we couldn't get many more people into our church because it wasn't large enough (though only about half the seating is occupied) and newcomers won't want to sit right next to strangers. I said that night clubs downtown are often violating occupancy regulations because that's where people want to be. If they really want to be in a particular church, they will go there even if there is almost no seating. It depends upon what's actually going on in the church service. Over the past couple of years there has been a move on to "promote flow" as a way of keeping newcomers coming back, to make signage that will promote "brand awareness" in those who drive by the church, to have "briskly flushing toilets", and ADA-compliant facilities to attract the handicapped, to have a nursery that is big and state of the art with video monitors of the service, etc., to attract families with small children, to air-condition the building (which would require about a bazillion dollars), to provide all those creature comforts that "people on the north side expect". It seems that most of what's being done is attempting to manipulate physical variables in order to stimulate an increase in attendance or giving.

Your mentioning Africa reminded me of what I wrote several years ago with respect to a financing scheme some people in the church had of using now-valuable church property to fund the building and operation of a plush new facility so they wouldn't have to "depend on" the giving of the constituents. They figured that appeals for giving would drive new people away and that the new building (and community rec center) would draw people from the surrounding area into the church. One woman was even talking about using some of the largesse to have a juice bar in the church.
People will also have to stop their magical thinking that if they build a building, it will fill up with people. This may work for certain species of birds. But it didn't work for the cargo cultists of the South Pacific trying to lure the cargo-laden W.W. II aircraft back to their island and it won't work for them. If a congregation renting space from [our church] is larger than [our church's] congregation, then this gives the lie to the assertion that the size of the present building is what is limiting the size of the ___________ congregation.

Besides, when there are churches in Africa and elsewhere bursting at the seams in horribly primitive buildings or meeting in illegal home churches in China at the risk of their freedom and lives, saying that we can’t expect our pews to be packed because people won't want to sit that close is saying that something other than Christian conversion and fellowship is controlling what's going on at [our church].

And the people who won't come because a place is crowded and because they won't want to sit close to others they may not know well are not the people who are going to be interested in giving because they're not interested in belonging. People who have to be coaxed in by soft seats for their butts, pleasant music for their ears, and a “feeling of flow" for them to mistake for the Spirit's leading, aren't interested in a church; they're interested in a church experience. They aren't interested in being spiritual but in feeling spiritual. The latter is a lot easier and less expensive. And isn't that just more cost-effective? For them, at least?

When some churches are happy just to have benches without backs and a corrugated tin roof for their meeting place, it's unconscionable for a church here in the States to claim their society can't support itself or grow without being able to extract money in a way forbidden by church rules from a "resource" which they themselves did nothing to create and to which they have no corporate title. "Hey, you guys over there in Kenya with your dirt floor and open-air air-conditioning, don't you wish your property happened to have become valuable real estate like ours did so you can "utilize" it and not have to depend on people carting in a sack of maize or some scrawny chickens or something else voluntary and, hence, something that cannot be counted upon to bring in the income no matter what? We're just so PUMPED over the way God has so richly provided for our tiny congregation [about 80-100] to have all the possible creature comforts we could want and not have to worry about how to pay for it! Is this Providence or what! Oh, and if our scheme goes through, we'll increase our level of "sacrificial giving" to the [denomination's] World Mission so you can rejoice with us."
The original scheme was voted down by the church membership; the most common reason voting no was "we'd like a new building, but not financed in this way". So the people who were pushing the first scheme started pushing it again but with slight changes. When asked by a board member why they were trying to do what the membership had voted against, they replied "Oh, that was for doing it this way; we're going to do it that way," the difference being that between a Lincoln and a Cadallic.
51 posted on 03/10/2007 8:33:12 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan
So often we will accept a "well they tried" atmosphere in worship instead of excellence, something we would never accept in our occupations or from our kids or in our home, but in church, well, that's what God has given us as if we expected Him to come and paint the hallway walls.

I agree you should keep up the place if financially plausible. It shouldn't look shabby. But this is different than having a hot new A/V system, entertainment, and soft-pedaled message to coordinate with the soft cushy chairs.

By far it is the message which cannot be compromised. To hear someone who continually compromises the message (e.g. Warren, even while saying he's not compromising) then tell us these things are so important, is laughable.

52 posted on 03/10/2007 8:33:45 AM PST by Terriergal (All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

It's Christianoid feng shui!


53 posted on 03/10/2007 8:34:40 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

WHAT!?! A Rick Warren thread and I'm not invited!


54 posted on 03/10/2007 8:35:27 AM PST by Gamecock (Ecclesia reformata, semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

I did -- I just forgot that that line was from it


No Problem :>)


55 posted on 03/10/2007 8:35:28 AM PST by WKB (Fred "YES", Duncan "yes", Newt "yes", Mitt "maybe", Rino Rudy "no way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DocRock; del4hope; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg; jude24; Ottofire; fishtank; ...

YBPDLNPL Ping


56 posted on 03/10/2007 8:36:59 AM PST by Gamecock (Ecclesia reformata, semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
If I get there and it's crowded and I have to fight for a seat, I'll probably not be back.

Maybe he should just get up a little earlier so he can get a seat.
57 posted on 03/10/2007 8:37:27 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
I have never been there, but my cousin, who was raised in a traditional church in Texas, observed that nobody (his words) carried a Bible--

In fairness to SB, it isn't the only modern church which many members do not carry a Bible--or read or believe...

58 posted on 03/10/2007 8:37:47 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

**Yeah, you know, worship has to be comfy!**

NOT!

These people need to get on their knees!


59 posted on 03/10/2007 8:39:36 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
What is so offensive in implementing the Great Commission, that you would feel the need to bash another Christian? While Warren may not be your way to Heaven, his methods have brought many people to Christ. Can't you let God be Warren's judge? Are you so dogmatic in your own theology, so doctrine driven, that you feel the need to criticize another persons ministry?

I can understand if Warren was a false prophet, or a heretic but he is simply a minister that leads people to Christ in a different way than you do. Give it a rest already.

60 posted on 03/10/2007 8:41:28 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson