Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"It is Written: Sola Scriptura"
The Highway ^ | Richard Bennett

Posted on 03/30/2007 11:03:33 AM PDT by Gamecock

"It is Written: Sola Scriptura"

 

"My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me" John 10:27.

By Richard Bennett

 

 

 

 

SCRIPTURE ALONE IS INSPIRED AND INHERENTLY AUTHORITATIVE.

The Biblical message breathed out by God is revelation in written form. (2 Timothy 3:15-16). The Biblical claim is that what God has inspired was His written word (2 Peter 1:20-21). When the Lord Jesus Christ said, "the Scripture cannot be broken" (John 10:35), He was speaking of God’s written word. The events, actions, commandments, and truths from God are given to us in propositional, i.e. logical, written sentences. God’s declaration in Scripture is that it and it alone, is this final authority in all matters of faith and morals. Thus there is only one written source from God, and there is only one basis of truth for the Lord's people in the Church.

 

THE TRUTH AND THE SCRIPTURE

The Lord Jesus Christ, in His great high priestly prayer, declared clearly the truth of God's Word. He said, "Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth." This was consistent with the declarations right through the Old Testament in which the Holy Spirit continually proclaims that the revelation from God is truth, as for example Psalm 119:142, "thy law is truth." The Lord Himself therefore identified truth with the written Word. There is no source other than to Scripture alone to which such a statement applies. That source alone, the Holy Scripture, is the believer’s standard of truth.

In the New Testament, it is the written word of God and that alone to which the Lord Jesus Christ and His apostles refer as the final authority. In the temptation, the Lord Jesus three times resisted Satan, saying, "It is written" as for example, in Matthew 4:4, "he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God." In stating "It is written," the Lord used the exact same phrase that is used in the Holy Bible forty six times. The persistence of the repeated phrase underlines its importance. The Lord's total acceptance of the authority of the Old Testament is evident in His words found in Matthew 5:17-18, 

"Think not that I came to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy but to fulfil. For verily, I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law till all be fulfilled."
 

OTHER SOURCES OF AUTHORITY CONDEMNED

Furthermore, in refuting the errors of the Sadducees, the Scripture records the Lord saying, "Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God" (Matthew 22:29). Christ Jesus continually castigated and rebuked the Pharisees because they made their tradition on a par with the Word of God. He condemned them because they were attempting to corrupt the very basis of truth by equating their traditions to the Word of God. So He declared to them in Mark 7:13 "[You are] making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such things do ye." Since Scripture alone is inspired, it alone is the ultimate authority and it alone is the final judge of Tradition.

The Word of the Lord says as a commandment in Proverbs 30:5,6 "Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar." God commands that we are not to add to His Word: this command shows emphatically that it is God's Word alone that is pure and uncontaminated.

Aligned with Proverbs, the Lord’s strong, clear declaration in Isaiah 8:20 is: "To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." The truth is this: since God’s written word alone is inspired, it¾ and it alone¾ is the sole rule of faith. It cannot be otherwise.
 

THE EXPRESSION "SOLA SCRIPTURA"

From the time of the giving of the Decalogue on Mt. Sinai, when Holy God wrote with His finger on the tablets of stone (Exodus 31:18), until this present day, the written word of God has been extant in the world. The term "sola Scriptura" or "the Bible alone" as the measure of truth is short hand, as it were, for the emphatic and repeated statements of Scripture and of the commandment of God. The very phrase " It is written" means exclusively transcribed, and not hearsay. The command to believe what is written means to believe only the pure word of God. It separates from all other sources the corpus what a man is to believe. What is at stake before the All Holy God is His incorruptible truth.

In the very last commandment in the Bible God resolutely tells us not to add to nor take away from His Word. 

"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book" (Revelation 22:18-19)

His Word is absolutely sufficient in itself. (Psalm 119:160)
 

THE PRESCRIPT AND INTERPRETATION

The principle of "sola Scriptura" is consistent with the very way in which the word of truth that comes from God, is to be interpreted, as Psalm 36:9 explains, "For with thee is the fountain of life; in thy light we see light". God's truth is seen in the light of God's truth. This is exactly the same as the Apostle Paul says, "Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth but which the Holy Ghost teacheth, comparing spiritual things with spiritual" (I Corinthians 2:13). It is precisely in the light which God's truth sheds, that His truth is seen. (Cp. John 3:18-21, II Corinthians 4:3-7.)

The Apostle Peter, under the impulse of the Holy Spirit, declares, "knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation. For prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost" (2 Peter 1:20-21). Logically then, Peter makes it very clear that in order to maintain the purity of Holy God's written word, the source of interpretation must be from the same pure source as the origin of the Scripture itself. Scripture can only be understood correctly in the light of Scripture¾since it alone is uncorrupted. It is only with the Holy Spirit's light that Scripture can be comprehended correctly. The Holy Spirit causes those who are the Lord's to understand Scripture (John 14:16-17, 26). Since the Spirit does this by Scripture, obviously, it is in accord with the principle that Scripture itself is the infallible rule of interpretation of its own truth "it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth" (I John 5:6).

Those truly desiring to be true to Lord in this very matter of the standard of "sola Scriptura" must turn to the Lord to obey His command, "Turn you at my reproof: behold, I will pour out my spirit unto you, I will make known my words unto you" (Proverbs 1:23). If one is yearning of truth in this essential matter, in the attitude of Psalm 51:17 "with a broken and a contrite heart", the Lord God will not despise, but reveal to him or her the basic foundation where the Lord Christ Jesus stood, as did the apostles. In the words of the Apostle John, "This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true." (John 21:24). The Apostle John wrote, as did Peter and Paul, in order that those who are saved should know that his testimony is true
 

THE ADEQUACY OF SCRIPTURE

The total sufficiency of Scripture is declared by the Apostle Paul, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." (2 Timothy 3:16-17). For final truth and authority, all that we need is the Scripture.
 

THE CLAIM THAT SOLA SCRIPTURA WAS NOT POSSIBLE

In an attempt to justify a tradition as an authority, an appeal is often made to the very last verse in John's gospel where it is stated, "And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen". (John 21:25) Of course there were many of the deeds and sayings of the Lord, which are not recorded in Scripture. Scripture is the authoritative record that Holy God has given His people. We do not have a single sentence that is authoritatively from the Lord, outside of what is in the written word. To appeal to a tradition for authority when Holy God did not give it is futile. The idea that somehow sayings and events from the Lord have been recorded in tradition is simply not true.

Another desperate attempt to justify tradition, is the statement that the early church did not have the New Testament. The Apostle Peter speaks about the writings of the Apostle Paul when he states, "even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction" (2 Peter 3:15-16). Peter also declares that he was writing so that the believers could remember what he said. So he wrote, "Wherefore I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things, though ye know them, and be established in the present truth" (2 Peter 1:12).

From the earliest times a substantial part of the New Testament was available. Under the inspiration of the Lord, the Apostle Paul commands his letters to be read in other churches besides those to which they were sent. This clearly shows that the written word of God was being circulated even as the Apostles lived. The Lord's command to believe what is written has always been something that the believers could obey and did obey. In this matter we must have the humility commanded in the Scripture not to think above what is written. "that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another" (1 Corinthians 4:6).
 

THE REGULATION AND OUR LOVE OF GOD

The Lord brings the topic of truth to bear on our love for Him. This again underscores its importance. "Jesus answered and said to him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings; and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent Me" (John 14:23-24). And then again "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words shall not pass away" (Matthew 24:35).

The Lord himself looked to the authority of the Scriptures alone, as did His apostles after Him. They confirmed the very message of the Old Testament. "The law of the LORD is perfect" (Psalm 19:7). The believer is to be true to the way of the Lord, holding alone to what is written: "Thy Word is truth."




TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: solascriptura
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2007 11:03:34 AM PDT by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; irishtenor; xzins; P-Marlowe

Ex RC priest Ping


2 posted on 03/30/2007 11:05:03 AM PDT by Gamecock (Ecclesia reformata, semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Gamecock
"It is Written: Sola Scriptura"
4 posted on 03/30/2007 11:20:18 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Holy Bible AND the Constitution. Words mean things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Well I suppose that the feminist version of the NIV Bible is completely, accurately and unquestionably God's Word as well. Dig in, I'm sure that it is entirely palatable to a good Christian.

http://www.tbaptist.com/aab/nivfembible.htm


5 posted on 03/30/2007 11:36:03 AM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Jesus had a few things to say about the traditions than man follows as well.


6 posted on 03/30/2007 11:40:34 AM PDT by Delta 21 ( MKC USCG - ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Oh, Goody!

Is this a caucus or can anybody play!


7 posted on 03/30/2007 11:50:28 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Another desperate attempt to justify tradition, is the statement that the early church did not have the New Testament. The Apostle Peter speaks about the writings of the Apostle Paul

I'll bite. Does Peter say that his own letter is scripture? If not, how do we know it is scripture?

From the earliest times a substantial part of the New Testament was available.

Substantial? How big is substantial? Peter and Paul? That's pretty substantial. Who testifies for that part not included in the substantial portion?

8 posted on 03/30/2007 1:01:32 PM PDT by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: siunevada

The Holy Spirit, obviously!!!


9 posted on 03/30/2007 1:12:36 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Dear Gamecock

As you may know I am Catholic and do not hold with Sola Scriptura. However Father Matt Kennedy at Stand Firm in Faith and in comments at Titusonenine does give a very able defense of the doctrine. You may find these interesting. Father Kennedy is a priest in the Episcopal Church ( he is an orthodox Anglican and does not agree with TEC' heretical direction) and a self described Calvinist.

God bless you.


10 posted on 03/30/2007 1:28:24 PM PDT by lastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
I suppose that the feminist version of the NIV Bible is completely, accurately and unquestionably God's Word

You go right ahead and suppose whatever you like.

I doubt the Bereans used that.

11 posted on 03/30/2007 1:44:46 PM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Holy Bible AND the Constitution. Words mean things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Here is a link to Father Kennedy's article on Sola Scriptura at Stand Firm in Faith

http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/is_sola_scriptura_anglican1/


12 posted on 03/30/2007 1:46:08 PM PDT by lastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
I doubt the Bereans used that.

Correct. Being Greeks, the Bereans used the Septuagint.

13 posted on 03/30/2007 1:50:33 PM PDT by Nihil Obstat (Holy God, Holy Mighty One, Holy Immortal One, have Mercy on us and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Ah, but you seem to support the idea of Sola Scriptura. Which Scripture are you Sola on?


14 posted on 03/30/2007 2:45:00 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nihil Obstat; newgeezer

"Correct. Being Greeks, the Bereans used the Septuagint."

Which, naturally, we still use somewhat to the consternation of the followers of a group of Westerners from 1500 years later who believed they knew better. Perhaps they were and are a more highly evolved form of human and so would know about these things, we Greeks generally being a bit on the swarty side with, as my son says, stubby little legs (He's 6'2").


15 posted on 03/30/2007 3:34:08 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nihil Obstat; Uncle Chip; kerryusama04; DouglasKC
Correct. Being Greeks, the Bereans used the Septuagint.

I think there were two factions the newly formed Church evangelized after Pentecost and the ones that seemed to be fighting it out were the "Grecian" Jews, (Hellenistic) and the Jerusalem Jews. The Church at that time was only concentrating on the circumcised....not the Gentile. The Hellenistic Jews, indeed did use the faulty Septuagint, and because of the poor translation and addition of unscriptural books they became at odds with the Apostles and early church. [Acts 6:1] And in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplied, there arose a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews, because their widows were neglected in the daily ministration. The Hebrews, of course taking their Saviour's word as a guide, did not use this translation....they used the Hebrew scriptures only: [Luke 24:44] And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the Law of Moses, and in the Prophets, and in the Psalms, concerning me.

These Grecian Jews evidently had a hard time accepting the Word of God and the teachings of the Apostles and set out to destroy the new Church: [Acts 6:8-10]: And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and miracles among the people. Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and "Alexandrians", and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen. And they were not able to resist the wisdom and the spirit by which he spake.

These same Septuagint using Greeks are the faction that attempted to kill the Apostle Paul: [Acts 9:29] And he spake boldly in the name of the Lord Jesus, and disputed against the Grecians: but they went about to slay him. Paul, being an educated man and newly converted to the Hebrew faction, did not use the Septuagint. He studied under "Gamaliel" [Acts 22:3] who himself was the Grandson of the Great Hebrew Scholar of the Babylonian Talmud fame...."Hillel the Elder". I assure you...these two great Hebrew Scholars did not use the Septuagint!

Babylonian Talmud was written in Hebrew

To assume that Paul would encourage the use of the Septuagint version of the Old Testament Scriptures....by the Bereans, or anyone else, is not logical.

16 posted on 03/30/2007 4:02:12 PM PDT by Diego1618
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Ah, but you seem to support the idea of Sola Scriptura. Which Scripture are you Sola on?

With His help, the one God put in my hands will do just fine, thanks.

One might wonder how those Bereans ever survived without your guidance.

17 posted on 03/30/2007 4:41:55 PM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Holy Bible AND the Constitution. Words mean things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
I would think that the most accurate of scripture would be in the original languages that were handed down. I don't care much for the NIV, but I do believe that the Word of God is THE authority, and not the word or words of man. As often as possible, I research the verses to see what was really intended the best that I can.

I don't really have a dog in this fight so to speak, but I know the scriptures tell me that the Holy Spirit will guide us into all truth. I believe that with all that is within me. The Spirit, not mere man.

18 posted on 03/30/2007 5:27:43 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

The one that God put into your hands? Without the guiding authority of His Church, how are you to know whether Satan's hand is in it as well?

Trust, but verify, saith a man whom I admired so much that I emigrated to the United States. I think that it is appropriate here.

Besides, you've completely sidestepped the issue of which Bible is the Word of God and even more importantly, how you know it.


19 posted on 03/30/2007 6:54:36 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Although the term 'Sola Scripture' doesn't exist in the bible, you don't have to spend much time there to see that God made no allowance for anything BUT sola scripture...

And one thing this article did not mention is that attacks on the word of God are Satanic in origin, and God built in the only mechanism to fight off Satan's attacks which is:

Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Eph 6:13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armor of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
Eph 6:14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;
Eph 6:15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
Eph 6:16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
Eph 6:17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

You go to war with Satan and his allies with the 'word of God' as your offensive weapon...What a great group of scripture...

20 posted on 03/30/2007 7:00:19 PM PDT by Iscool (There will be NO peace on earth, NOR good will toward men UNTIL there is Glory to God in the Highest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson