Cuz I made myself a new rule, I can't talk to those anti kind of people anymore but whatizname wants to know who spewed and it would be himself.
MAGICSTERICAL=spewing.
It is an attempt to degrade and if it was meant as a joke it is not funny unless you're maybe 11 yrs old and it isn't even original.
It is an attempt to degrade and if it was meant as a joke it is not funny unless you're maybe 11 yrs old and it isn't even original.
NOT AT ALL.
Actually, I find this: It is an attempt to degrade to be mind-reading and very poor and thoroughly inaccurate mind-reading, at that.
My original and abiding motive in ORIGINATING--to my awareness I was the first to come up with the term--the word--my motive was and is to highlight--put a spotlight on--EMPHASIZE--the very
HUMAN TENDENCY--VIRTUALLY--HUMAN NATURE--in ANY collection of humans gathered together in a group; given a lofty intellectual, RELIGIOUS title and mandate
. . . the natural human tendency, compulsion, habit for such individuals in such groups IN ALL DENOMINATIONS to become MAGICAL AND HYSTERICAL in their thinking and their pronouncements--also with great pride; great chips on their shoulders and great tendencies to be punitive, hostile and condescending to all who disagree with their learned and sanctimonious pronouncements.
85-95% of my observations of such have been with Proty MAGICSTERICALS. My observations of RC MAGICSTERICALS have been from a distance and a lot fewer. But I find all of the examples I've observed to be essentially similar if not the same on key aspects as noted above. I haven't found a single such group in any denomination to be worth putting much stock in and mostly, wholesale more fitting to put a lot of wariness up about. I have seen far more of them be at least 51% destructive if not overwhelmingly destructive. That is not limited to Proty such groups--though they have been my primary observational examples that I've derived my conclusions from.
and if it was meant as a joke it is not funny unless you're maybe 11 yrs old
Well, you just happen to be factually absolutely wrong on that score. A number of the more mature, good humored, brighter and balanced, charitable folks hereon FREEPMAILED me that it was one of the more amusing things they've ever seen me write. But I do understand that folks with chips on their shoulders and thin skins would be somewhat likely to not find it funny.
and it isn't even original.
News to me. I came up with it out of the blue, having never seen it before, as I was writing a post on FR. Evidently GMTA. LOL.
Now, as to spewing . . . I am well capable of SPEWING as are a number of RC folks.
But I don't think folks really want to see me write such stuff and I am not interested in writing such stuff. But I CAN show you spewing--and it's several orders of magnitude worse than MAGISTERICAL. Perhaps the suggestion to "grow up, get a thicker skin and trash the chip on one's shoulder" would be good advice hereon.
I do NOT consider FR nor America a place where folks have a RIGHT to be UNoffended. I believe we are responsible before God about the offenses we needlessly take up; take to heart and respond to out of a bad faith sort of heart attitude.
Even pointed, satirical, mocking hyperbole has a place--it is in many places in Scripture. But I've not written in such a style hereon for quite some time. I'm well capable of returning by popular RC acclaim, if so desired, however.
I tend to have a bias for a robust sort of aggressive free for all exchange of ideas and even of emotions. I've muted that wholesale--largely because of Mad Dawg being my friend and wanting me to. But I still have strong preferences in those directions.
I thought it was a bit of an overreach. MAGICSTERIUM would have been droll, and MAGISTERICAL would have been witty, but going for the two-for-one and saying MAGICSTERICAL is just sophmoric.