I find it quite ironic that the doctrinal system which calls itself "covenant" seems to have as its cornerstone doctrine the misconception that God has abrogated his covenant with Abraham.
Not at all.
OK. So, does Covenant doctrine teach that God's covenant with Abraham and his seed is still in effect with his seed?
Absolutely. Paul explicitly tells us who that seed is.
OK. So, does Covenant doctrine teach that God’s covenant with Abraham and his seed is still in effect with his seed?
Absolutely. Paul explicitly tells us who that seed is.
= ==
Ahhhhh, the rubber dictionary strikes again . . . along with the Slipping and Sliding and Shucking and Jiving School of Biblical Interpretation . . .
The Covenant still applies to Blood Israel except that it doesn’t because The Cross obliterated their DNA and lineage
. . . so God is going to have a real rough time choosing 12,000 from EACH of the 12 patriarchical tribes . . .
And God didn’t really EMAN TRULY EVERLASTING COVENANT . . . He only meant a temporary covenant until the Replacementarians could arise and tell Him how to get it right . . .
So, all bets are off, nothing is dependable except Replacementarian obtuseness, rubber Bibles, rubber history books, rubber dictionaries and rubber logic books.
The children of Jacob were foolish to trust that God meant what He said about an EVERLASTING COVENANT—they should have known that the Replacementarians would arise and change God’s mind.
/sar
The dispy bible doesn’t teach Jeremiah 31:31 or the Book of Hebrews. They’re “too hard”, lol