To: Coleus
So, the argument begins (again) … why is it constitutionally wrong to carry a gun on ones person?
2 posted on
12/31/2007 9:41:00 PM PST by
doc1019
(Rabbit and the Hare … Fred ‘08)
To: doc1019
"Mr. Coleman stated he told the victim someone could get shot over this." I think the issue is, if you carry a gun, and say things like this to people, the police will find a way to intervene.
3 posted on
12/31/2007 9:53:48 PM PST by
the invisib1e hand
(whose spirit is hillary channelling these days?)
To: doc1019
why is it constitutionally wrong to carry a gun on ones person?It's always wrong to carry at .25. The Glock should be ok.
4 posted on
12/31/2007 10:12:05 PM PST by
PAR35
To: doc1019
"...why is it constitutionally wrong to carry a gun on ones person?" Unless he was carrying the briefcase, it wasn't. I'm not familiar enough with Ohio law, but in many states, if the guns were locked in a briefcase, it's not against the law to have them in your vehicle. Some states require guns and ammo to be carried separately, or in the trunk.
5 posted on
01/01/2008 3:53:28 PM PST by
Wonder Warthog
(The Hog of Steel-NRA)
To: doc1019
Gee, haven’t the cops heard of the “church militant”?
9 posted on
01/03/2008 9:39:12 AM PST by
miele man
(Continually voting against iodine deficient libs for 42 years)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson