Well, I’m not going to go 12 rounds with you on this, but I would like to know how you know St. Paul’s usage in Titus 3 is defined as you say it is. It is not elaborated on in the Scripture cited, so, since there is no self-referencing of the passage in Scripture itself, the definition you use must come from a different source. This makes Scripture not as “perspicuous” as the Reforemers alleged, and seems to be perilously close to creating one of the “traditions of men” that elsewhere you make a point of pushing away from. I’m not trying to argue so much as I’m trying to see the thought process here.
Jesus announced the difference between the genealogical promise (Judaism) and the faith promise (Christianity.)
Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself? Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God: Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying. Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw [it], and was glad. Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by. John 8:53-59
Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, [saying], In thee shall all nations be blessed. So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. Galatians 3:6-9
But it is not. We are born of God.
The lesson with reference to the third part, will, can be seen in Simons desire to buy the Holy Spirit from Peter so that he could pass it on himself by laying on hands (flesh.) (Acts 8)
The lesson of the first two parts is in the conversion of Cornelius. Cornelius was not Jewish (blood.) Moreover, he was born into the family of God (received the Spirit) before Peter layed his hands on him, baptized him or even finished telling him about Jesus (flesh). (Acts 10:44-47, Acts 11:15-17, Acts 15:1)
As Peter said, what was I that I could withstand God?
So there is only one genealogy that matters we must be born again.
Likewise, if someone else was reborn under different circumstances, then good for them. But give God the glory. Because God alone makes any of us anew.
Thus I again aver that I will not engage in discussion of genealogies whether of blood, flesh or will. It is vanity.
But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. Titus 3:9