[SkyPilot]

I spoke out against anyone who made that accusation without proof. If you can make the accusation and back it up, go for it, is what I said. If you can't, then you're just a common, cheap gossip, as well as a violator of the Eighth Commandment.

No - that is not accurate. Go back and search.

Let's speak plainly. You told me of your association with him, and you complained to the moderator and had a post removed where I accused Cardinal McCarrick of being homosexual removed.

Then, you wanted to bring the conversation into the private realm through Freepmails.

I told you then priests who had worked with McCarrick divulged he was "gay."

You went (in my opinion) ballistic.

It turns out I was correct. The "proof" you ask for is akin to a videotape of OJ murdering Nichole.

Let me remind you, the Cardinal's position on "Homosexual Unions" is contrary to the Bible itself:

Card. McCarrick’s Acceptance of Homosexual Civil Unions

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Leviticus 18:22

"For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet."

Romans 1:26-27

[sitetest]

Dear SkyPilot,

“No - that is not accurate. Go back and search.”

I really don't have enough emotionally invested to bother.

Obviously, this has been bothering you a very long time.

As you have previously misinterpreted my posts herein, it wouldn't be surprising to me that you're not correctly interpreting a conversation from some time ago.

If I asked the moderator to remove the comment, it was because it was done without evidence.

And saying, “I know some folks who told me it's so,” isn't evidence. It's gossip. Low, cheap gossip.

sitetest