Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix

“It’s clear to me that the RC perceptual problem distorting and rubberizing Scripture, definitions, history, logic and math thoroughly all out of whack and dependability is alive and well and functioning quite as usual to render words 100% mangled with little even remote connectedness to what I wrote and meant.”

You are the one who told us you follow Guy Malone and back him completely.

You are the one who posts to the UFO threads and posits about the coming “deceptions” and world government and UFOs.

If I have misinterpreted your theology, then, you haven’t made it clear.

You seem to think that your interpretation of the Catholic faith is what we should believe. This is your post:

“It’s still shocking to me that you honestly believe so much nonsense about all that. Amazing. Shockingly amazing.””

What we believe is nonsense to you. You have mischaracterized and misinterpreted our beliefs to a horrendous degree.

“OR REPENT AND RETRACT—as y’all are so prone to say—>such an outrageous example of bearing false witness.

It’s clear to me that the RC perceptual problem distorting and rubberizing Scripture, definitions, history, logic and math thoroughly all out of whack and dependability is alive and well and functioning quite as usual to render words 100% mangled with little even remote connectedness to what I wrote and meant.”

I will absolutely not retract what I said. I interpret your space-demon theology in the same light as you do the dogma of the church.

If you care to defend your UFOtheology, do so.

But, don’t tell me you are entitled to your personal interpretation of others’ beliefs and expect no one to interpret yours.


149 posted on 04/10/2008 5:14:53 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: OpusatFR; All; Alex Murphy; alpha-8-25-02; blue-duncan; Dr. Eckleburg; ears_to_hear; ...
I have another big cabinet project today. Not sure when I'll respond point by point.

But first a bit of an English lesson and an attempt yet again to help that SAME VS DIFFERENT RC perceptual/logical problem.

1. INTERPRETATION is DIFFERENT from "YOU SAID, TAUGHT, . . . "

2. Such as:

A) "It appears, seems, sounds like the ATTITUDES expressed toward the Magnificent Magical Earth-Mother Mary caricature are attitudes of WORSHIP."

B) "You have stated, written several TIMES the number of lines, posts, paragraphs in praise, focus on the Magnificent Magical Earth-Mother Mary caricature than you have in praise of focus on Jesus."

IT WAS BRAZENLY, FALSELY, STATED THAT:

I believed or thought that John's Revelation was/is

"a treatise on space demons in motherships."

SHOW ME
Where I said
THAT
I believed
or THOUGHT
AT ALL
that
John's
REVELATION
WAS/IS
"a treatise on space-demon aliens in motherships."

SHOW ME!

The RC edifice

CANNOT SHOW ME THAT!

It was a clear
seemingly brazen
FALSEHOOD
about
a verifiable
FACT
. . .
commonly called
a lie.

It will either be
CONFESSED AS SUCH
AND
REPENTED OF
OR
IT
WON'T.

You are the one who told us you follow Guy Malone and back him completely.

SHOW ME where and how I said that.

I may well have said I have complete confidence in his character. I don't recall at all saying I completely agreed with every word he said. I don't think I 100% completely agree with 100% of Alamo-Girl's words and she's probably the one person in my extended network that I most agree with on planet earth. I certainly agree with most of what Guy Malone has to say on the topic. But that's not what you said.

IN COMPLEX SPIRITUAL AND/OR RELIGIOUS arenas, topics, areas . . . nuance can mean a lot.

But this isn't even nuance. These are starkly clear DIFFERENCES. They are NOT the SAME things.

It's quite clear that if RC folks will distort words, sentences, concepts this much . . . how easy it must have been for political power mongers to wholesale mangle Scripture, history, definitions, logic toward increasing their powers of control and their coin coffers by constructing a new RELIGION built around Magnificent Magical Earth-Mother Mary's carefullly constructed caricature . . . since added to . . . the latest even in our era . . . whenever the idolatrous 'faithful' need yet another excuse to wrote more hymns, poetry, adoring worshipful nonsense--not to JESUS--NOT EVEN TO the AUTHENTIC Mary--but to Mary's caricature.

We see the same process of text mangling occurring in this thread. No wonder the RC edifice needed to keep Scriptures UNDER CONTROL. They couldn't allow the serfs to be able to compare the AUTHENTIC UNrubberized text with their rubberized version and see the vast DIFFERENCES. Goodness, they'd be able to see that the Magnificent Magical Eart-Mother Mary caricature and the authentic Biblical Mary were NOT the SAME at all.

THANKS ENORMOUSLY for such a VIVID demonstration of the RC EDIFICE's compunctions to mangle text, statements, words, truth all out of any reasonable recognition.

171 posted on 04/10/2008 8:51:12 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: OpusatFR

Sounds like the shoe on the other foot is not so comfortable.

Should be interesting. Will RC’s quit distorting what Prottys say because the RC’s can’t stand perceived ditortion by Prottys of what the RC’s purportedly believe?

Naw. Jesus will come back first.


172 posted on 04/10/2008 8:55:02 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson