Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Typos. Blunders. Mine.
1 posted on 07/11/2008 1:04:23 PM PDT by Teófilo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NYer; Salvation; rrstar96; Nihil Obstat; bornacatholic; mileschristi

PING! Please disseminate through Catholic ping list.


2 posted on 07/11/2008 1:05:29 PM PDT by Teófilo (Visit Vivificat! - http://www.vivificat.org - A Catholic Blog of News, Commentary and Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo

I think you may well be right.


3 posted on 07/11/2008 1:07:36 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo

This is what our “tolerance” gets us, folks.

It just eggs these bastards on.


4 posted on 07/11/2008 1:09:26 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo

This is a great idea, however it will be quite the trick to actually get the Attorney General to initiate a prosecution.

And the illustrious Professor Myers would welcome such a prosecution because it would obtain him some major props from his fellow anti-Christian/anti-American scumbags.


7 posted on 07/11/2008 1:15:36 PM PDT by mkjessup (Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Tehran. A true American Trifecta. [Hey, better late than never, right Mahmoud?])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo

Can’t wait for Mr. Brave Professor to conduct a comparable stunt against Islam.


8 posted on 07/11/2008 1:17:42 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo

If he hasn’t commited one yet, by soliciting help in obtaining the Eucharist, then if he actually gets the Eucharist and does what he has threatened to do to it - and puts up the evidence of what he’s done on YouTube, or whatever, then by all means he should be charged with a hate crime, in my opinion.


11 posted on 07/11/2008 1:25:03 PM PDT by Boagenes (I'm your huckleberry, that's just my game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo

Notwithstanding the definition of “hate crime”, let’s just accept this as a sacrilige. If we qua Catholics pursued this line, we would be acknowledging its supremacy and we later would be charged as purveyors of hate if we followed such hateful acts as opposing homosexuality or abortion or, in the not too distant future, murder. Surely, there is some “religious” sect out there (e.g. Atheists?) that would sue that we are “hate mongers” because we dis-agree with their ‘theological’ beliefs. To seek government protection against insults (sacrilige) is to buy into government control of theology.


14 posted on 07/11/2008 1:59:02 PM PDT by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo
I would caution you on following this line of attack. It could very well back fire (the Catholic's brought up on hate crimes for not supporting gay marriage to bunnies or something.

Seriously though, I have met a guy who claims to be the gentleman in question on a few blogs. He is a total nut job, and will use your posts as a badge of honor.

Pray for his soul. He is very anti Christian (in n odd way he doesn't go against other religions), and not very good at logical debate.

20 posted on 07/11/2008 4:01:32 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo

“Real property” does not include consumables.


21 posted on 07/11/2008 5:56:02 PM PDT by idahogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo
The question now is, is this criminal solicitation and attempted conspiracy to commit a hate crime across state lines? I'm no lawyer, but I can read the statutes.

Thought crime requires Thought Police. This "hate crime" thing can turn and bite you.

24 posted on 07/11/2008 7:49:23 PM PDT by Lee N. Field (You wouldn't want a postmodern to fix your car. Why would you trust him with your theology?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo

**Has Professor Myers engaged in a hate crime?**

I would say he had engaged in a hate crime.


25 posted on 07/11/2008 8:53:22 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lsucat; Mrs. Don-o; narses

ping


29 posted on 07/12/2008 1:26:10 PM PDT by Ebenezer (Strength and Honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Teófilo
PZ Myers the evolutionist. Keep in mind something T.H. Huxley wrote:
"In addition to the truth of the doctrine of evolution, indeed, one of its greatest merits in my eyes, is the fact that it occupies a position of complete and irreconcilable antagonism to that vigorous and consistent enemy of the highest intellectual, moral, and social life of mankind--the Catholic Church."

- T.H Huxley, Darwiniana.

A response from The Catholic League:
"The Myers blog can be accessed from the university’s website. The university has a policy statement on this issue which says that the ‘Contents of all electronic pages must be consistent with University of Minnesota policies, local, state and federal laws.’ One of the school’s policies, ‘Code of Conduct,’ says that ‘When dealing with others,’ faculty et al. must be ‘respectful, fair and civil.’ Accordingly, we are contacting the President and the Board of Regents to see what they are going to do about this matter. Because the university is a state institution, we are also contacting the Minnesota legislature."

30 posted on 07/12/2008 11:45:08 PM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson