Posted on 07/18/2008 6:46:18 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
GRAPEVINE, Texas (BP)--Have you ever noticed that when a discussion turns to a recently deceased celebrity, someone invariably says, "I know he's looking down on us right now"? It doesn't matter how godless the person was, his peers refer to him as being in a better place and then gesture skyward.
Mark Coppenger, professor of Christian apologetics at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, sees a lamentable example of that in the 1941 poem "High Flight," which was quoted in tribute to astronauts who died in the 1986 explosion of the Space Shuttle Challenger.
Not all the astronauts were Christians "but we were told they 'slipped the surly bonds of earth to touch the face of God,'" Coppenger noted. He also recalled a cartoon in a Chicago newspaper that depicted the late sports announcer Harry Caray being welcomed by Saint Peter at the pearly gates, even though there was no evidence Caray was redeemed.
"Everywhere you turn, culture ignores the Bible to make gassy pronouncements on the afterlife," Coppenger said.
Such secular cultural perceptions are uninformed by the truth and seem to be based on the delusion that one's eternal destiny is determined either by heinous deeds or good poll numbers.
Some people assume the dearly departed are in heaven because they weren't notorious sinners. People want to believe the departed went to heaven because they know they themselves are sinners and want to believe they are not bad enough for hell. "I'm not as bad as the other guy," goes the thinking. "God will somehow understand in the end that we were pretty good people, and based on our overall behavior He should let us into heaven."
In a 2004 address at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, David Dockery, president of Union University in Jackson, Tenn., said, "Even those who retain some vague idea of heavenly bliss beyond this life are slow to acknowledge the reality of final judgment and condemnation. Modern men and women live with the mindset that there is no heaven, no hell and therefore no guilt."
FOCUSED ON THIS WORLD
Steve Lemke, provost of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, said so much error is found in popular thinking about eternity because there's "less preaching now about heaven and hell than in previous eras." He attributes that trend to the upward social mobility of Southern Baptists.
Until the 1950s, Southern Baptists were mostly rural, small-town folks and heaven was the only respite many poor people expected from their hardscrabble existence, Lemke noted. "So we lived with hope and our eyes on the skies, awaiting Christ's return," he said.
But with increased education and income, Southern Baptists moved to suburbia and began enjoying a fairly comfortable lifestyle with a focus on coping in this world, Lemke added.
"We don't give nearly the attention we should to eternity," he said. "Popular preaching focuses on how to have a better marriage, better relationships and how to cope with struggles.
"It is important that we address these topics in preaching and teaching, of course, but not to the neglect of a focus on eternity," he said. "By this very focus on meeting needs in this world -- to the neglect of preaching on heaven and hell -- we are showing by our actions that this world is more significant than the world to come."
Malcolm Yarnell, associate professor of systematic theology at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth, Texas, sees two causes for the neglect of preaching on eternity, both of which "reflect the power of contemporary culture to distort the message once-for-all given to the saints."
"First, our people and pastors are increasingly interested in making heaven here on earth," Yarnell said. "The modern pursuit of material wealth and comfort, alongside the overarching desire to avoid pain or physical problems of any type, is a longstanding and pervasive influence in our culture. Rather than challenging such a mindset, some of us quietly cave into the demand for sermons to consider primarily mundane matters.
"Second, the subject of hell is not exactly the most comfortable subject to address," he said. "Postmodernism, with its attendant religious inclusivism and aversion to judgment, is the dominant outlook of our cultural elite, especially in the media; to condemn non-Christians to an eternity in hell is considered impolite, even rude."
"In the 1950s of my childhood, it was easier to preach on hell because there was more widespread conviction that the Bible was true," Coppenger added. "Or perhaps it worked the other way around: There was greater respect for the Bible because ministers preached the whole counsel of God, including the reality of hell, without embarrassment, mumbling, or marketing spin."
A NEED TO HEAR THE TRUTH
People think about the afterlife, but they need to hear the truth amid the eschatological blather espoused by the New Age movement, Mormonism, universalism, and other false religions, Coppenger added.
Yarnell agreed: "We don't clearly enough make the biblical connection between the doctrine of heaven and hell and the life we live today. The unfortunate consequence of this neglect is that we too easily live like permanent residents of the City of Man rather than the resident aliens we are, headed to our good end as Christ's people in the City of God."
Even people on opposite sides of the Calvinism issue seem to agree on certain matters of eternity, Yarnell added.
"Both traditional Baptists and Calvinist Baptists look at Scripture as inerrant and the supreme source of our doctrine," Yarnell said. "The New Testament is filled with references to heaven and hell. There is not a page of Scripture that, directly or indirectly, does not call the hearer to consider his eternal standing before an eternal God. If you derive your proclamation from Scripture, you will preach heaven and hell. On this, all conservative Southern Baptists will agree."
Muslims may talk more about eternal consequences than do evangelicals, says former missionary Eddie Pate, associate professor of missions at Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary.
"Heaven and hell are issues I talked about all the time with Muslims," Pate said. "Many of my best conversations revolved around these topics. I would guess that, during our years on the mission field, heaven and hell were topics in at least half the conversations I had with Muslims.
"Muslims believe people who follow the pillars of Islam will go to heaven -- at least they hope so," Pate added. "But Muslims can't speak with any assurance like Christians can. They can't embrace 'Christ died once for our sins, once for all, the just for the unjust that he might bring us to God' (1 Peter 3:18). They have no such confidence."
Mormons, on the other hand, teach a universalistic view of an afterlife, explained Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary President R. Philip Roberts, who has written and lectured extensively on cults.
LDS founder Joseph Smith was traumatized by the accusation that his brother who died as a teenager had gone to hell and fashioned a religion in which "everyone is going to a better place," Roberts said. "Whether you are as evil as Adolf Hitler or whatever your lifestyle, you're at least going to go into a celestial kingdom, which Mormonism teaches is a far better place than this life and world, a place of great bliss and happiness."
Smith included all his elements of an afterlife -- becoming like gods and having many wives -- after becoming involved in polygamous affairs, Roberts noted. "His doctrine of the afterlife was created to satisfy his need to provide some kind of quasi-universalism and to cover his moral failures," he said.
THREE REASONS TO PREACH ON ETERNITY
Preaching on the doctrines of heaven and hell are vitally important because they "teach us not only of the life to come, but teach us much about how we should live in the everyday of life today," said David Nelson, theology professor and academic vice president at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary in Wake Forest, N.C.
"The doctrine of heaven and, yes, the doctrine of hell, lead us to reflect on the greatness and goodness of God who is holy and who is love, who is beautiful and glorious," Nelson said. "To fail to teach these doctrines is to fail to teach of the fullness of God by whom we are all to be filled, as Paul puts it in Ephesians 3."
"No preacher in his right mind enjoys preaching on hell," added David Allen, theology dean at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. "Hell is a place terrible beyond imagination. But no preacher in his right mind can avoid preaching on hell. As Paul said in 2 Corinthians 5:11, 'knowing the terror of the Lord, we persuade men.'"
Allen said he preaches about hell for three reasons:
1) It is a biblical doctrine. Jesus spoke more about hell than about heaven. Jesus uses the word "Hades" four times in his preaching and the word "hell" 11 times. Eighteen of the 28 times Jesus uses the word "fire" in the Gospels, he is talking about hell. If there is no hell, then there is no punishment for sin.
2) We are commanded to preach the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27). The Lord will hold his preachers accountable for preaching all of the Bible, not just the parts of it people like to hear.
3) Jesus lived, died and rose again so people would not have to go to hell. Only Jesus can save someone from his sins and from hell.
"Doctrinal preaching is drastically needed in our churches," Allen said. "Believe it or not, most people in the churches want to know what God said about heaven and hell. In fact, most lost people want to know as well. When I preach on hell, I have found most people give serious attention during the message.
"Remember, one should never preach on hell as if he were glad people were going there," he added. "If you don't preach with a tear in your eye, at least preach with a tear in your heart when you preach on hell. Speaking the truth in love in the power of the Holy Spirit is a powerful thing. Trust God to bless your preaching in this area and you will not be disappointed -- and neither will your people."
Eddie Pate remembers when he first listened to a cassette tape of Jerry Spencer, his uncle, preaching on hell.
"One summer, 30 years ago, as I painted a house, I listened to that same cassette tape over and over," Pate recalled. "The title of the sermon was 'If Hell Is Hell and We Don't Tell, What Kind of People Are We?'
"The title and the theme might sound 'old school' these days, but I hear that question go through my mind almost every day," Pate said. "As leaders and pastors we must regain the passion, emotion and depth of feeling that comes from understanding that our unsaved friends are indeed lost and bound for an eternity in hell outside of Christ. We must bear precious seed, weeping."
Thanks for that most outstanding post...
“But I am still looking for a text which says mere mortals such as we rub elbows with daily are punished to the same degree.”
This seems to be the true basis of the argument. We mere mortals are less guilty and thus deserve a lesser punishment. I disagree with the conclusion and we have shown two different takes on Rev. 20.
You say people thrown into the lake of fire die, I say they do not. Fine.
How about Daniel 12:2? What is meant by ‘everlasting contempt?’
To find the definition of good and evil, you need look no further than the Good Book. God clearly defines what He considers good to be.
You say that some acts are neutral. I disagree. Even to evaluate an act as neutral you are first determining that it is better than the bad act.
Don’t you see that this leads to the reasoning that the first act is bad and the second is good? It is your human mind that is evaluating it.
But with God, good and evil are written out in black and white.
I think of good and evil like I think of white and black. White is all color. Black is the absence of color. You may determine that there is a gray, but again, the gray is a little better than the black, in that it is X number of steps closer to white.
I understood the "Second Death" to be total separation from God. I admit that I could be mistaken.
Thank you so much for that link! It rang in my soul like a tuning fork that causes a quiet fork of like note to vibrate when the first is set to vibrating. I particularly liked the explanation of how the Love of God will be torment to some and LIFE to others, but His Love will go forth the same to both yet the reception of It will be so different based upon the disposition of the heart.
Correctamundo TD. As you say, the great white throne judgment described in Rev ch 20 is reserved for the unsaved who during their life on earth declined to accept Jesus Christ by faith in Him as their Lord and Savior. Since they declined to accept the gracious offer of Jesus to pay the penalty for their sins they will be judged according to their works in their earthly life. Which means that even one unlawful act or thought (Matt 5:28) will be found sufficient to disqualify a man or woman for eternal life and to consign him/her to eternal damnation in a place of suffering infinitely far from God's Heaven. IOW, they will be condemned to "the second death" because they refused God's free offer of eternal life through faith in His Son Jesus Christ and His atoning death in their place.
But, those who have been declared righteous by virtue of their belief in Jesus Christ as the Son of God in human flesh and in His resurrection from the grave, and have confessed Him before men as Lord have had their penalty for sin paid by Jesus' atoning death (Romans 10:9-10). And wonderful wonder of wonders, His perfect righteousness has been put to their account. Because of that, and only because of that, they will not be judged at the Great White Throne judgment. Their imputed innocence of all sin well be confirmed by the angel finding their names in the Lamb's Book of Life, and they will enter into God's holy city called Heaven to reside there forever.(Rev 21:27)
Read all about it y'all, it's in the Book that many of you have in your homes but never open.
But you aren't. Jesus spoke as plainly about the unbelievers' fate separated from God in an eternal hell as he did about the believers' eternal life in Heaven. (Luke 16:22-26). All men and women will die physically unless they are among those believers who will be raptured to meet Jesus in the air, but only those unbelievers who refused the free gift of salvation in their earthly lives will be condemned to hell at the Great White Throne Judgment. If physically dead unbelievers are present at that judgment, as the book of Revelation says, how can natural death be their punishment if they are condemned to the lake of fire as that passage also says they will be?
Some Christian people believe that the term "lake of fire" is descriptive of a place of mental and emotional suffering and is not literal fire, and I can't prove beyond doubt that they are mistaken. But I firmly believe that many people who spiritualize the bible wherever it offends their sensibilities are often denying the plain truth that God intends as His warnings to unbelievers of what awaits them if they persist in unbelief until their physical death.
I’m not sure, but I think I may have posted a thread on it years ago that went nowhere.
I may try again sometime. I’m pleased that you benefited from reading it.
‘I understood the “Second Death” to be total separation from God.’
That is a good way to put it and I agree. But another viewpoint seizes on “the wages of sin is death,” and applies it directly to the Final Judgment. This would also imply that the wages of sin is two deaths, a silly notion in my opinion.
Indeed, it borders on Buddhism.
Before I became a Christian, I had this notion the God was out to get me: to PUNISH me for the things I'd done wrong.
To ZAP me for the laws i'd scorned.
After all, the popular media siad this was how He(she?) was.
Even after beCOMING a Christian, that notion was STILL there!
But I can to realize that was a strawman; put in place by one who DIDN'T want me to know God's love.
I find it very interesting that this was a topic of debate in very early Christianity (though this dissident view was ultimately suppressed) by the powers that be in those days.
I'd call it an incorrect view more than dissident.
Luke 16:19-31
19. "There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day.
20. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores
21. and longing to eat what fell from the rich man's table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.
22. "The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham's side. The rich man also died and was buried.
23. In hell, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side.
24. So he called to him, `Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.'
25. "But Abraham replied, `Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony.
26. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.'
27. "He answered, `Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father's house,
28. for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.'
29. "Abraham replied, `They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.'
30. "`No, father Abraham,' he said, `but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.'
31. "He said to him, `If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.'"
WHAT!!??
It sounds like you believe what the BOOK said, and not what a lot of people THINK the BOOK said!
And SO many parents entrust their children to these non-believers every day.
And are found in the FLDS.
UNSAVED?
That's not how it reads...
Splitting hairs perhaps?
Prior to the fourth century there was no "New Testament". Most people could not read and there were very few "books". Most stories about the life of Jesus and what he said were passed down orally and written down much later.
It is very difficult to know what Christianity was really like in those days and how it could have evolved much differently than it did.
But I can to realize that was a strawman; put in place by one who DIDN'T want me to know God's love.
I too believe in God's love, but I believe that it transcends Christianity and all of the other beliefs.
However, I realize that you don't agree with me and I respect that.
Very interesting thread! When I am not on FreeRepublic, I am often on a board for people with melanoma. When one of the members there loses their battle, the euphemism “earned their wings” is utilized, implying that they have become angels and gone to heaven. Several problems with this theology!
Through personal experience, I have learned not to argue this nuance in the public forum, but have often gone to private messages to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Nowhere of course. This type of thread is good because it forces people to think about "hell", but unfortunately it teaches non-biblical doctrine. What does the bible say what the fate of unrepentant sinners is?
From the beginning God is clear about what happens if you don't obey him or his laws, if you sin:
Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Die. Not burn eternally. Die.
And this brings up a good point. If man can die, than man isn't already "immortal". We are not eternal.
Back to Adam and Eve. What did God do when Adam and Eve sinned?
Gen 3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever:
Gen 3:23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
Gen 3:24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
God blocked the way to eternal life, immortal life, from man. Man is temporal. Man is physical. Man is composed of dust, dirt and clay, or at least the same elements. Man, in and of himself, is mortal.
Oh, and who was it that perpetuated the lie, the myth, that man doesn't really die?
Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Satan started the lie that man has an immortal soul. That we don't really "die" like God said.
Eternal life, immortal life, and immortal soul, ONLY comes through Jesus Christ.
Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
What are the options? Perish OR eternal life. Not eternal life burning forever OR eternal life with Jesus. PERISH or eternal life.
The greek word translated "perish" means to "destroy fully".
Joh 12:25 He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal.
We lose our life, or we have eternal life.
Mat 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
God DESTROYS our SOUL and body in hell. In Gehenna fire. Our soul is what we are, not what we have. We WILL be destroyed if we reject Christ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.