Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Obama Administration pressuring the Holy See to slience Archbp. Burke?
What do the prayers really say ^ | 03/26/09 | Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Posted on 03/26/2009 5:25:37 PM PDT by chase19

Is the Obama Administration pressuring the Holy See to slience Archbp. Burke?

Context: Archbp. Burke recently made clear statements in an interview about pro-abortion Catholic politicians and Holy Communion.

It is written by Austin Ruse, "President of the New York and Washington, D.C.-based Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute (C-FAM), a research institute that focuses exclusively on international social policy."

Read the whole thing there, but this is the salient part:

Thursday, 26 March 2009 Hey, Obama: Hands Off Burke Print By Austin Ruse

A reliable source tells me that someone representing the Obama administration is about to put pressure on the papal nuncio to the United States to get Archbishop Raymond Burke to be quiet. The Obama complaint is that Archbishop Burke, who is now head of the Apostolic Signatura in Rome, has supported another bishop in his chastisement of Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius for her support of abortion.

...

Burke closed the interview by issuing a challenge to his brother bishops, most notably Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C.: “Every bishop is held to the same universal discipline which has been in force since the time of St. Paul the Apostle and is stated in canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law.” And then this: “Whether Governor Sebelius is in the Archdiocese of Kansas City in Kansas, or in any other diocese [italics mine], she should not present herself for Holy Communion because, after pastoral admonition, she obstinately persists in serious sin.”

You can see why the Obama administration might get upset about this. They played footsie with pet Catholics of left and right last year and thought they had this kind of problem covered, since some of them have already offered cover for Sebelius. Two groups created to offer such services, Catholics United and Catholics in Alliance, started a petition drive saying Sebelius was really pro-life.

And now there is word that someone who is well known among Republicans, and who has served in previous Republican administrations, is reaching out on behalf of the Obama administration to get the Holy See to quiet Burke, or at least to make it clear he speaks not for the Church, but only for himself.

...

But it’s not just questioning her fitness for office that offends Obama and his Catholics. They are also offended about Burke questioning Sebelius’s fidelity to the Catholic Church, for this strikes at the heart of their appeal to Catholics in the pews. Catholics who believe the Democratic answer to health care is more important than the murder of a million children a year desperately need the fiction that someone like Sebelius is a Catholic in good standing. Burke gives the lie to that assertion.

...

The pressure won’t work, of course. Burke is just too smart, and tough. But Obama and his representatives are coming dangerously close to interfering in internal Church matters. [Just setting the stage for what is to come.] More than anything else, the free exercise clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution was intended precisely to protect religious bodies from meddling by the state, even covert meddling by the White House like this. Obama and his pet Catholics should back off – and fast.


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bho2009; canon915; democrats; obama; sebelius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
...the timing is interesting (from a poster at wdtprs):

http://deacbench.blogspot.com/2009/03/burke-irked.html

1 posted on 03/26/2009 5:25:38 PM PDT by chase19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chase19

“And now there is word that someone who is well known among Republicans, and who has served in previous Republican administrations, is reaching out on behalf of the Obama administration to get the Holy See to quiet Burke, or at least to make it clear he speaks not for the Church, but only for himself.”

I wonder who this individual might be...?


2 posted on 03/26/2009 5:29:57 PM PDT by chase19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chase19

I was wondering that, too.


3 posted on 03/26/2009 5:44:42 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chase19

Kmiec


4 posted on 03/26/2009 5:47:09 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chase19

I am sure Pope Benedict supports Archbihop Burke 100%.


5 posted on 03/26/2009 5:47:52 PM PDT by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

I read a suggestion on another site that it was either Kmiec or Paul O’Neill (Treasury Secy under Bush). I don’t know anything about O’Neill’s religious positions, but he’s certainly more important and more of a political figure than Kmiec, so maybe he’s the one.


6 posted on 03/26/2009 5:52:18 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ardara

Amen..


7 posted on 03/26/2009 5:55:23 PM PDT by philly-d-kidder (The First Day of Spring had snow flurries... Damned global Warming!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham; livius

I believe it’s that little lap-dog Kmiec as well. He’s been very quiet over the ND scandal which is weird since he’s usually out swinging the bat loudly for - The Abortion President. Methinks he may be still swinging the bat by applying pressure but quietly this time.


8 posted on 03/26/2009 6:07:04 PM PDT by chase19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ardara

I have no doubt in my mind that he will. They’re on the same page. Prayers up for both these great men.


9 posted on 03/26/2009 6:08:42 PM PDT by chase19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chase19

Apparently the sitting President is totally ignorant, as I surmised, regarding The US Constitution. (Other than that he thinks it’s flawed and he’s not.)

Archbishop Burke has the full support of Pope Benedict XVI because this situation is exactly what the Pope spoke of when he was here in the States.

And if the sitting President thinks he is ‘bigger than the Pope’ because he thinks he’s some kind of messiah bringing his salvation to the world . . . he’s not just a fool (who has said in his heart ‘there is no god’), he’s a d@mn fool.


10 posted on 03/26/2009 6:10:02 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (The Constitution & Bill of Rights stand as a whole. Remove any part & nullify the whole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chase19

Didn’t the Nazis prior to WW2 manage to compromise the Church’s leadership?


11 posted on 03/26/2009 6:13:53 PM PDT by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chase19

Didn’t the Nazis prior to WW2 manage to compromise the Church’s leadership?


12 posted on 03/26/2009 6:13:56 PM PDT by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chase19

LOl! Burke will NOT be silenced.

They don’t know Burke very well.


13 posted on 03/26/2009 6:34:07 PM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

**Didn’t the Nazis prior to WW2 manage to compromise the Church’s leadership?**

No


14 posted on 03/26/2009 6:35:25 PM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

No, but there were Nazis in the priesthood, just as there were Communists. My guess is that at least some Irish clergy were pro-German.


15 posted on 03/26/2009 7:50:33 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

You wrote:

“Didn’t the Nazis prior to WW2 manage to compromise the Church’s leadership?”

No. The leadership of the Church - before and during WWII - was decidedly against Hitler and the Nazis.


16 posted on 03/27/2009 3:13:43 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chase19

The Holy Father can resolve some of this by replacing the bishop of Washington DC.


17 posted on 03/27/2009 3:21:07 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

I would also like B16 to call Fr Jenkins to Rome for little chat.


18 posted on 03/27/2009 3:23:57 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

it’s gotta be.


19 posted on 03/27/2009 3:25:07 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chase19

The Holy See has a long history of dealing with hostile governments/politicians. Rome isn’t going to silence Archbishop Burke regardless of how much pressure the Administration tries to exert. Obama better watch himself here because if anyone goes down in this contest, it won’t be the Church.


20 posted on 03/27/2009 5:03:50 AM PDT by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson