Posted on 05/05/2009 2:07:14 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
If you read the comments threads on the Divine Mrs. MZs recent post on Notre Dame, President Barack Obama and the U.S. Catholic bishops (or some of them, at least), you can see that we are veering back into familiar territory. I am referring to the tendency among many mainstream journalists to make references to trends among Catholic voters, American Catholics and other broadly defined terms that reveal next to nothing in terms of usable information.
The truth, of course, is that it is becoming harder and harder to argue that American Catholics are part of one church, with one approach to doctrine, morality or church life.
At the Washington Post, Michelle Boorstein managed to pack some of this complexity into a way-to-short update under the headline, Notre Dames Obama Award OK with Most Catholics. The word most is crucial, of course. Heres the lede:
There is a vocal and influential constituency of American Catholics who disapprove of the University of Notre Dames decision to invite President Obama to speak at the Catholic university and receive an honorary degree in mid-May. But almost twice as many Catholics approve of the invite not a total shock since the majority of American Catholic voters cast ballots for the president.So who are these angry Catholics? The road, as usual, leads to the omnipresent pollsters at the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. And once again, the most significant statistic can be found further into the report, way past the headline grabbing fact that 50 percent of Catholics (whatever) back Notre Dames decision to violate a U.S. Catholic Bishops policy (full text here) by giving Obama an honorary doctorate, while 22 percent say they disaprove.Catholics upset with Notre Dame for giving Obama (a supporter of abortion rights and embryonic stem-cell research) what many see as American Catholicisms highest award have been slamming Notre Dame since the honor was announced.
But here is the key statistic, if you want to understand the complexity that many reporters are missing especially in newsrooms without experienced religion-beat professionals.
(A)uthors of the poll note that there is a gap in the Notre Dame controversy that persists in so many arenas between more and less observant Catholics. Among white, non-Hispanic Catholics who attend church weekly or more often, approval of the decision plummets to 37 percent. Forty-five percent said the decision was wrong. Among those who attend less often, 56 percent support the invite while 23 percent oppose it.Here is the actual language from the polls executive summary:Pews poll also shows that weekly attending white Catholics are now noticeably more negative toward Obamas performance compared with earlier this year. In fact, a plurality of this group (45%) now disapproves of the job Obama is doing, more than double the figure in February (20%).
(A) new poll conducted by the Pew Research Centers Forum on Religion & Public Life also finds a deep division on this issue between the most-observant Catholics and those who are less observant, as defined by frequency of worship service attendance. These findings are consistent with Catholics overall views of Obama: a majority voted for him in the 2008 presidential election and express approval of his performance in office thus far. The new findings are also consistent with Catholics views on abortion and embryonic stem cell research, with pluralities in the poll expressing support for each. But a division between the most-observant Catholics and less-observant Catholics also is apparent on these issues.Did you catch that? The disagreement over Notre Dame and Obama is essentially the same as the disagreement among clashing American Catholic camps over the issue of the moral and legal status of abortion itself. In fact, 61 percent of the attend less often Catholics believe that abortion rights should be protected in all or most cases, as opposed to 30 percent (still an interesting number) among the attend weekly Catholics.
Clearly, there needs to be another line drawn inside the attend weekly flock if we are interested in finding what unites the Catholics the pro-catechism Catholics? who back the U.S. bishops statement opposing the granting of honors to those who actively oppose Catholic teachings. We need to know more about the Catholics who are mad at Notre Dame.
Thus, let me once again share the four-pronged typology that a veteran priest here in Washington, D.C., gave me a few years ago. There are, he said, four kinds of Catholics in this country and, thus, four Catholic votes on almost any issue. Any news report that lumps these groups together isnt worth very much.
* Ex-Catholics. Solid for the Democrats. Cultural conservatives have no chance.
* Cultural Catholics who may go to church a few times a year. This may be one of those all-important undecided voters depending on whats happening with the economy, foreign policy, etc. Leans to Democrats.
* Sunday-morning American Catholics. This voter is a regular in the pew and may even play some leadership role in the parish. This is the Catholic voter that is really up for grabs, the true swing voter that the candidates are after.
* The sweats the details Roman Catholic who goes to confession. Is active in the full sacramental life of the parish and almost always backs the Vatican, when it comes to matters of faith and practice. This is a very small slice of the American Catholic pie.
So, who is cheering for Notre Dame? Who is booing?
I confess (key word) that I think the pros at the Pew Forum needed to ask one more question. The weekly Mass question is crucial, but what about that other controversial sacrament? What about people who do and dont go to confession?
Clearly, there needs to be another line drawn inside the attend weekly flock if we are interested in finding what unites the Catholics the pro-catechism Catholics? who back the U.S. bishops statement opposing the granting of honors to those who actively oppose Catholic teachings....
* Sunday-morning American Catholics. This voter is a regular in the pew and may even play some leadership role in the parish. This is the Catholic voter that is really up for grabs, the true swing voter that the candidates are after.
* The sweats the details Roman Catholic who goes to confession. Is active in the full sacramental life of the parish and almost always backs the Vatican, when it comes to matters of faith and practice. This is a very small slice of the American Catholic pie.
The first to categories are staunchly Democrat liberals.
Of the third category, maybe 40-60% of the “Sunday Morning” Catholics would ever care to vote for a conservative political candidate.
The final “slice of the pie” is the “Sweats the Detail” group. These overwhelmingly vote conservative, but they are, as stated, “a very small slice of the American Catholic pie”.
That tells me that those with a Catholic church association are an overwhelmingly liberal block of abortion-loving idiots.
It is amazing that so-called “conservatives” would associate with such a group.
much blame to the American Church leaders for muddying the waters and sending mixed messages (equivocating on pro-abortion Dems receiving communion, equating “social justice” issues with life and morality, tolerating some seminaries and convents that are flat-out Communist/Feminist outposts, etc.)
As did I, which is part of why the article caught my interest. You probably read them on Free Republic a couple of weeks ago, on the thread Bare Minimum Catholicism, although that article took them from a GetReligion article, too.
The key question here, the one that GetReligion asks but does not answer, is "how small is it?" The corollary answer is perhaps more important - "is that slice growing or shrinking?"
A “Catholic” who does not attend weekly Mass is like a “College Student” who doesn’t go to college.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.