Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary not just for Catholics anymore
Catholic News Service ^ | Dec-8-2006 | Patricia Zapor

Posted on 06/18/2009 4:02:05 PM PDT by bronxville

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-194 next last
To: annieokie

“Well, no thanks, my early reformers grew up and learned we don’t need to pray through her.”

So you’re following “early reformers”? Which one(s) are you following?


81 posted on 06/18/2009 6:11:26 PM PDT by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: narses; annieokie

Hail Mary full of grace,
the Lord art with thee,
Bless art thou among women,
And blessed is the fruit of thy womb Jesus.
{Luke, I, 28}

Thanks narses.


82 posted on 06/18/2009 6:13:22 PM PDT by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

Actually, scripture says:

” 46 And Mary said,
“My soul magnifies the Lord,
47 and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior,
48 for he has looked on the humble estate of his servant.
For behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed;
49 for he who is mighty has done great things for me,
and holy is his name.”

Magnify means “to extol; praise”. Remember Jewish poetry tends to repeat the same thing in different words in a second phrase - so “My soul magnifies the Lord” is followed by “my spirit rejoices in God my Savior”.

Hence the NIV translation:

And Mary said:
“My soul glorifies the Lord
47and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior,
48for he has been mindful
of the humble state of his servant.
From now on all generations will call me blessed,
49for the Mighty One has done great things for me—
holy is his name.

Jesus is not made bigger or better by the soul of Mary (the other definition of magnify). She is simply giving glory to God.

And why? “...for the Mighty One has done great things for me”. Not HER ministry to HIM, but God’s to her.

Nothing in this passages even suggests an eternal ministry for Mary. Because “...all generations will call me blessed;”?

We do all her blessed, as she was, but that is completely true without any eternal ministry of Mary. Had she died the day after birth, she still would have been called blessed for all generations.


83 posted on 06/18/2009 6:16:02 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

If venerate means to honor, as you claim, would the Catholic church be willing to substitute honor for venerate in its descriptions of Mary and cease praying to Mary (and the saints)? I suspect not, which makes your claim of equivalence implausible.


84 posted on 06/18/2009 6:19:40 PM PDT by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

To: narses

31Then Jesus’ mother and brothers arrived. Standing outside, they sent someone in to call him. 32A crowd was sitting around him, and they told him, “Your mother and brothers are outside looking for you.”

33”Who are my mother and my brothers?” he asked.

34Then he looked at those seated in a circle around him and said, “Here are my mother and my brothers! 35Whoever does God’s will is my brother and sister and mother.”

Mary was subordinate to him because she is not God.


86 posted on 06/18/2009 6:22:28 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

“Mary was subordinate to him because she is not God.”

So when the Holy Writ says:

He was obedient to them. {Lk 2:51}

The Holy Writ simply gets it wrong? Odd that point of view. Certainly not Biblical.


87 posted on 06/18/2009 6:23:59 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr Rogers

“Had she died the day after birth, she still would have been called blessed for all generations.”

Why? And how is that not an ‘eternal ministry’?


90 posted on 06/18/2009 6:28:32 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

Oh, c’mon...the first part of the “Hail Mary” prayer was taken direcly from scripture as the angel announced to Mary her chosen status to bear the Messiah. She was indeed “blessed AMONG women”, not ABOVE women. The rest of the canned prayer which is repeated over and over again in praying the rosary was added by the Romanist church.

No scripture ever tells believers to ask Mary to “pray for us sinners”. What can she ask our Heavenly Father for that we cannot come directly to Him?

No scripture ever tells believers that Mary is “the Mother of God”. She is the human birth giver of Jesus’ human body. He is the incarnation of Almighty God, as we read in John chapter 1, “In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was made flesh and dwelled among us. All things were made by Him and without Him was not anything made that was made.”

As a former Roman Catholic, I have seen the truth and it sets me free. Jesus is the way, the truth and the life and no one comes to the Father but through Him. This is NOT Catholic-bashing. It is trying to speak the truth in love.


91 posted on 06/18/2009 6:29:18 PM PDT by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Juan Medén; bdeaner

How does the word Honor change anything? I ask many people I honor to pray for me, why not the Mother of God?


92 posted on 06/18/2009 6:29:27 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: narses

And where does anyone say that Mary is “subordinate” to Jesus?

It is a sign of respect.
Why wouldn’t I respect my mother’s wishes even though I’m in my 40’s and have children of my own?

It’s a sign of respect. A sign of Honor, as in “Honor your father and mother”


93 posted on 06/18/2009 6:29:57 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: narses
Hi annieokie - the prayer suggested is straight Biblical text, is it your opinion that the Holy Writ is flawed somehow?

Hail Mary full of grace, the Lord art with thee, Bless art thou among women, And blessed is the fruit of thy womb Jesus. {Luke, I, 28}

Would that be from Luke 1:

"28 And coming in, he said to her, "Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you."

94 posted on 06/18/2009 6:30:25 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: TimeLord

John 2

he obeyed his mother’s direction at Cana


95 posted on 06/18/2009 6:31:22 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

>>It is trying to speak the truth in love.<<

Make that “speaking YOUR truth”.
My truth is different.


96 posted on 06/18/2009 6:31:39 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: boatbums; bronxville

“She was indeed “blessed AMONG women”, not ABOVE women.”

Really? But you say:

“...the angel announced to Mary her chosen status to bear the Messiah. “

She was the ONLY women so Blessed, NO?

How is that particular, singular and Most Holy Blessing NOT “ABOVE {other} women”?


97 posted on 06/18/2009 6:31:51 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: narses

Why? Because of all the young women who have ever been born, she was chosen by God for the birth of Jesus. That sounds pretty special to me! She was blessed!

But where do you derive an eternal ministry out of that?


98 posted on 06/18/2009 6:35:43 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

In the 1984 New International Version translation, yes - http://bible.cc/luke/1-28.htm - but that is a very new, controversial and certainly not TRADITIONAL translation.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Today’s_New_International_Versionfor comments like “It is explicitly Protestant like its predecessor;...” and the very simple and obvious issue of gender confusion. Modernists love this translation - I know that many denominations do not.


99 posted on 06/18/2009 6:37:08 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: narses
So when the Holy Writ says: He was obedient to them. {Lk 2:51} The Holy Writ simply gets it wrong?

It says, "And he went down with them and came to Nazareth and was submissive to them."

When he was 12, he "was submissive to them". "Was" is past tense, not future.

100 posted on 06/18/2009 6:40:10 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson