Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cardinal Schonborn celebrates New Year's Eve Mass in Medjugorje
MedjugorjeVideo ^ | 12/31/2009 | MedjugorjeVideo

Posted on 01/03/2010 12:22:04 PM PST by Servant of the Cross

December 31, 2009 – Thousands of people from all over the world chose to shun traditional New Year’s Eve revelries and instead sought a holy experience in Medjugorje, Bosnia-Hercegovina.

Throngs of pilgrims converged on St. James Church and the surrounding area to take part in an historic New Year’s Eve Mass celebrated by Cardinal Christoph Schonborn, the archbishop of Vienna and an esteemed member of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Cardinal Schonborn has been in Medjugorje since December 28 on what was originally thought to be a private visit. The cardinal has surprised the faithful, however, by making his visit very public. During his talk in St. James Church on December 30, 2009, he went so far as to call Medjugorje a “superpower of mercy.”

The following is a video of the Cardinal's Mass (at link):

During his homily at the New Year’s Eve Mass, Cardinal Schonborn said the following:

“Dear brothers and sisters here in the Church and on the squares in front of the church and in the yellow hall. We are all conscious of the fact that it is a big privilege to not have to celebrate the New Year with champagne.”

The crowd laughed, and the Cardinal added “Maybe later,” which was followed by laughter and clapping.

He continued: “But now we are allowed to celebrate the beginning of the New Year with Mary and Joseph and with the child that is lying in the manger and with the shepherds. These days, we have all come to Medjugorje to be especially close to the mother of the Lord. To be more exact, we have to say that we have come here because we know that the mother of the Lord wants to be close to us. (snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at medjugorjevideo.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Prayer; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: medjugorje; schonborn
“We all have received the faith. And through baptism we all have received the task to pass on the faith. The shepherds related what they were told. And from there it went on. The gospel, the good news was told and those who told it were believable. Those who heard also saw that the word and life harmonize, that what the witnesses saw is also true in their life.

“How can we be witnesses of the good news? First, by looking to Mary. Mary kept all that happened in her heart and pondered it. Brothers and sisters, what we need most in this time is prayer. I’m saying this with a sadness of some sorts. I know that I’m praying not enough. I know that prayer is life. Without the living relationship with God our life becomes dry end empty.

“What does the Mother of God tell us all the time? Pray. Take yourself time for prayer. Is that a good resolution for the New Year? For us priests and deacons. For us all. Time for prayer. It gives so much strength and so much joy. So much clarity. Let us ask Mary that she helps us to pray more. When we pray our word is also filled with life. And then our testimony is credible.”

"I want to tell you something about what the Apostle Paul told us. The Year of Paul is already over, we are now in the Year of Priests. But the word of the Apostle Paul was so strong because it was filled with life. In the reading of today he talks about God sending his Son so that we can become sons. The daughters are not excluded here. Daughters and sons are meant together. But Paul says we are called to become sons, not slaves. Like Jesus is Son of God we are supposed to be allowed to call God Father. In the beginning of this year the Apostle Paul tells us: You are sons and not slaves.

"I believe Medjugorje is a place where a lot of people confess. Confession is deliverance from the slavery of sin. Nothing makes us less free than sin. God wants us as sons: Freedom of the children of God. And for that he gifted us with the sacrament of reconciliation. We are to have a new relationship with God, to be allowed to call him Abba. Jesus invited us to that in a way that we trust Him, that we trust God. There is so much fear of God in us (or, "we are so afraid of God").

The cardinal went on to say "Jesus, I trust in you," in Croatian and Polish, and then continued "Pope John Paul II left us this message: Trust in the mercy of God. Trust in the mercy of Jesus.

"Trust can be heroic sometimes, if life becomes difficult. If a marriage becomes a burden, if an illness oppresses us, if we don't know what becomes of our work; then to say Jesus I Trust in You; that can be heroic. Trust; that really is an act of faith. And again we look to Mary. Who has made and gave this act of trust, of faith, more than Mary? Jesus I Trust in You. That is to be our program in the coming year.

"It is almost midnight and it is cracking," the cardinal said as he pointed towards the firecrackers going off outside. "But we are not cracking, we are praying. We are not cracking but we are singing.

"And a last word: The shepherd returned, praised God, praised him for what they heard and saw. We, too, will return home. In order that we can become witnesses of the gospel, we have to praise God first. The shepherds praised God for what they have seen and heard. I hope that we can all drive home, travel home after these days here and praise God for what we have seen and heard. Then people will also believe us when we tell, then our word will be credible.

"Now it is almost midnight. It is exactly the right moment to profess our faith. With this faith we are going into the New Year. God bless this year."

1 posted on 01/03/2010 12:22:05 PM PST by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross; NYer; narses

FANTASTIC!!!!

Now since the good Cardinal has gone against the Vatican and venerated that spot, maybe we can ditch another “Shepherd” who wants women to be ordained and birth control allowed!!!!


2 posted on 01/03/2010 12:53:04 PM PST by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
In response to the false criticism of Cardinal Schonborn above, may I quote the following from a liberal magazine a year ago:
CARDINAL SCHONBORN, Austria's oldest member of the clergy, has condemned his predecessors for not speaking out against birth control. After the publication of the encyclical Humanae Vitae which denounced contraceptive use, many bishops conferences reminded Catholics that they could rely on their individual conscience when it came to contraceptive use. Schonborn saw these actions as cowardly and suggested that those bishops were "frightened of the press and of being misunderstood by the faithful."

It is clear now that the 'anti-Medjugorje' brigade will try to portay the good Cardinal as some kind of 'liberal' who can be discounted, whereas, as chairman of the group responsible for the Catechism of the Catholic Church, he is a central and important figure in the Church hierarchy, one whose endorsement of Medjugorje is of critical importance.
3 posted on 01/04/2010 6:59:36 AM PST by davidtlig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidtlig

You signed up on FR yesterday to post dribble on “Catholic DisneyWorld”

“What the Church has forbidden.
From the statements given to date by ecclesiastical authorities it is clear that no one holding an office in the Church (bishop, pastor, rector, chaplain or other) may by virtue of that office lend official sanction to activities which tend to assert the supernaturality of Medjugorje, that is, to contradict the decisions made by competent local authority. Those statements speak only of pilgrimages organized under official auspices; however, common sense tells us that a conference or other activity sponsored by a diocese, parish or other Catholic institution would also be prohibited. Likewise, there could not be public veneration (cultus) of the Blessed Virgin under the title of Our Lady of Medjugorje, since this would suggest the certainty of her appearing there. The title Queen of Peace, however, is already part of the patrimony of the Church.”

Your Cardinal is disobeying the Vatican.

Be gone troll.


4 posted on 01/04/2010 8:11:22 AM PST by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
"Be gone troll"

Charming indeed!

I see you feel no need to apologize for trying to suggest that the Cardinal was a liberal who was in favour of contraception.

The good fruits of Medjugorje are so overwhelming that it shouldn't need a prominent Cardinal's support to make it more accepted, yet Bishop Peric's disbelief in ALL apparitions of Our Lady (including Fatima and Lourdes) probably does need some counterbalancing from the hierarchy to make Catholics think twice before following the Bishop's guidance.

"Your Cardinal is disobeying the Vatican"

As Cardinal Schonborn is a member of the CDF then the Vatican has clearly got problems!


5 posted on 01/04/2010 10:01:08 AM PST by davidtlig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: davidtlig

I feel no need to apologize to trolls at all. You should feel blessed that I addressed you at all.

The “good fruits of Medjugorje” are a bunch of people making cash off of ignorant people like you.

Bishop Ratko Peric said there is nothing supernatural going on there. Actually, under canon law, the local Bishop or Ordinary has the investigative authority over such event in his Diocese. This means that statements by the Bishop of Mostar have the effect of a declaration on whether or not the claimed apparitions can or cannot at this time be considered valid by the Roman Catholic Church.

Protest that fact to your hearts content, dump your money there and disobey the Vatican in regard to venerating that site. Good for you. A fool and his money are soon parted, so good luck with that!


6 posted on 01/04/2010 10:32:38 AM PST by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
"Bishop Ratko Peric said there is nothing supernatural going on there. Actually, under canon law, the local Bishop or Ordinary has the investigative authority over such event in his Diocese."

I'm always ready to be enlightened by intelligent people like yourself but I think you will struggle to find ANY canon law that states what you state above. It has certainly become good 'etiquette' to pass investigations on to the local bishop but, for good reason, there seems to be no actual canon law about this.

You don't seem to be a lover of humility.... Are you actually a Christian?
7 posted on 01/04/2010 10:53:06 AM PST by davidtlig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: davidtlig

Wrong. And this is the last information I will give you.

Had the people been obedient to the Bishop, it would have ended locally, as it should have. Now since it has become a worldwide circus because of the disobedience, Rome will step in. Think that the Bishop’s word means nothing. Lots of Medjugorjebots do.

Like I said, your money. Good luck with that.

Bu-bye!


8 posted on 01/04/2010 11:38:42 AM PST by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Wrong. And this is the last information I will give you.

Not sure what this is a reply to.

I see you have not been able to quote me a canon law saying the local bishop has authority over apparition judgements, so here is another common error you were trying to push.

Like I said, your money. Good luck with that..

Thank you, but I'm not aware of spending any money......

Bu-bye!.

Bye-bye Mr (or Ms) 'netmilsmom'.


9 posted on 01/04/2010 12:16:18 PM PST by davidtlig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: davidtlig
The good fruits of Medjugorje are so overwhelming[...]

Good things have happened at/because of Medjugorje. That doesn't make it authentic, though it doesn't make it false either.

Disobedience toward the local Ordinary, and disobedience toward the Pope is most certainly, however, a bad fruit. Now that the Holy See has weighed in on the matter, all that a prominent Cardinal does by acting in an official capacity there is to call himself into question.

As Cardinal Schonborn is a member of the CDF then the Vatican has clearly got problems!

Yes, it has. I hope the matter is dealt with swiftly (and hope that a public apology by Cdl. Schonborn is sufficient to remedy the problem).

10 posted on 01/04/2010 5:27:04 PM PST by GCC Catholic (0bama, what are you hiding? Just show us the birth certificate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: davidtlig
I'm always ready to be enlightened by intelligent people like yourself but I think you will struggle to find ANY canon law that states what you state above. It has certainly become good 'etiquette' to pass investigations on to the local bishop but, for good reason, there seems to be no actual canon law about this.

I don't know for certain, but I doubt there is a particular canon governing this - Canon Law works as much on general principles as it does on specific details.

Most investigations/clarifications/judgments that take place would be dealt with on a diocesan level; these can usually be appealed to Rome if one is not satisfied with the decision. This principle, that of subsidiarity, allows the bishop to deal with what is in his competence, and prevents Rome from being backlogged with every story about every potential apparition that is claimed.

Besides this, no formal judgment can be made until the apparitions cease - that has always been the case for any apparition. In this regard, Medjugorje is odd in that the claimed messages have gone on for so many years.


Also, I forgot to ask above... what is your evidence that Bishop Peric denies all Marian apparitions? I have not heard that before.

11 posted on 01/04/2010 5:36:36 PM PST by GCC Catholic (0bama, what are you hiding? Just show us the birth certificate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic
Good things have happened at/because of Medjugorje. That doesn't make it authentic, though it doesn't make it false either. Disobedience toward the local Ordinary, and disobedience toward the Pope is most certainly, however, a bad fruit.

Jesus said "by their fruits you shall know them" and that is always going to be the test of Truth. I repeat, the good fruits of Medjugorje are overwhelming. Anyone who investigates Medjugorje with a good spirit will confirm that situation.

There has been absolutely NO disobedience towards the Pope at any time. The evidence that Pope John Paul II was very supportive of Medjugorje is very strong. The visionaries and the Franciscans try their best to obey the Bishop at all times but there are ambiguities in matters of authority between the Franciscans and the secular clergy in the area.

I hope the matter is dealt with swiftly (and hope that a public apology by Cdl. Schonborn is sufficient to remedy the problem).

This comment fairly takes my breath away!! Cardinal Schonborn's visit has been an important contribution on the difficult path of the Church hierarchy developing a correct and proper attitude to the events in Medjugorje. We do not know what difficulties will yet arise but eventually, the Church leaders will come to recognize that in Medjugorje, Our Lady has been appearing in an unprecedented way in order to help rejuvenate a dying world.

Besides this, no formal judgment can be made until the apparitions cease

Absolutely, so the various activities of Bishop Peric which try to tell the world that everything is false in Medjugorje are very much out of order. This is why the Vatican some years ago (through Cardinal Bertone) felt it necessary to point out the that the views of the Bishop were his own and not those of the Vatican.

what is your evidence that Bishop Peric denies all Marian apparitions? I have not heard that before.

The best response I can make is that I have been told this by 'usually reliable sources' but I accept that this information might turn out to be inaccurate.
12 posted on 01/05/2010 3:53:54 AM PST by davidtlig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: davidtlig
Jesus said "by their fruits you shall know them" and that is always going to be the test of Truth. I repeat, the good fruits of Medjugorje are overwhelming. Anyone who investigates Medjugorje with a good spirit will confirm that situation.

I (and many others) would confirm that there are good fruits surrounding Medjugorje. Whether or not they are because of Medjugorje has yet to be officially evaluated - first by the diocesan ordinary, then by the Holy See. This cannot happen until the apparitions cease.

The evidence that Pope John Paul II was very supportive of Medjugorje is very strong.

That Ven. John Paul II was supportive of Medjugorje is helpful (and indeed is one of the reasons why I personally keep an open mind regarding it). Yet, remember that he is no longer the Pope, and new directives have been issued by the current Pope regarding Medjugorje (see post 4).

The visionaries and the Franciscans try their best to obey the Bishop at all times but there are ambiguities in matters of authority between the Franciscans and the secular clergy in the area.

Saying that there were "ambiguities" is a very kind way to put it. The two sides have been going in circles over this for years. Numerous Franciscans have been dismissed by the order, not to mention the circumstances surrounding the now-defrocked Fr. Vlasic. Not all of the fruit is good fruit.

This comment fairly takes my breath away!! Cardinal Schonborn's visit has been an important contribution on the difficult path of the Church hierarchy developing a correct and proper attitude to the events in Medjugorje. We do not know what difficulties will yet arise but eventually, the Church leaders will come to recognize that in Medjugorje, Our Lady has been appearing in an unprecedented way in order to help rejuvenate a dying world.

This whole paragraph presupposes that the apparitions are true, which we cannot say with certainty. We cannot say with certainty that the Church (the opinions of individual Church leaders aside) will recognize anything about it.

Without a doubt, the Cardinal's action was divisive, and harms the case for Medjugorje more than it helps it. Bishop Peric himself has decried the VERY public nature of the Cardinal's visit, saying that it "brings greater suffering to his diocese".

Rather than giving an "important contribution," he has simply stirred the pot.

I will however note that, having re-read what the Holy See said, I was incorrect to assert that the Cardinal violated the letter of the directive. That he spoke very publicly in favor of Medjugorje is certainly contrary to the spirit of the directive, but that would not constitute formal disobedience.

Absolutely, so the various activities of Bishop Peric which try to tell the world that everything is false in Medjugorje are very much out of order. This is why the Vatican some years ago (through Cardinal Bertone) felt it necessary to point out the that the views of the Bishop were his own and not those of the Vatican.

Those views are not those of the Vatican because the Vatican can have no official view at the moment. But the Holy See is upholding the Bishop Peric as the competent authority to judge, and to place certain restrictions on those clergy who visit Medjugorje. No other certain

Do not forget that Lourdes and Fatima were in similar circumstances at one time. If I recall correctly, the Bishop of the diocese in which Fatima is located was especially suspicious of the goings-on there. Patience, prayer, and obedience to the bishop and the Holy See are essential.

The best response I can make is that I have been told this by 'usually reliable sources' but I accept that this information might turn out to be inaccurate.

If it's not documented in some official manner, it's hearsay. Besides, no Catholic must believe that anything supernatural happened at Fatima or Lourdes (or Medjugorje) - only that the Church has approved them and said that their messages are not contrary to the Faith. That is Bishop Peric's right as a Catholic the same as it is yours or mine. The only ones bound to believe that a private revelation is true are those to which the revelation is given.

In some further reading, I did come across such a thing in a pro-Medjugorje website, but the context seems to be that of discrediting Bishop Peric and his judgment rather than saying anything useful. Hardly a prudent manner of judgment, and useless as proof of an assertion.


I am still of the opinion that a public apology (to Bishop Peric if not in general) is in order, and that for now we would to far more good by promoting the messages of approved apparitions such as Fatima, Lourdes, and La Salette, which share the messages of Medjugorje.

13 posted on 01/05/2010 9:32:55 AM PST by GCC Catholic (0bama, what are you hiding? Just show us the birth certificate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic
Dear friend,

I hope I am not going to sound too patronising here but you come across as a well meaning person. However, you are viewing things from a legalistic standpoint as if assessing arguments in a law court.

We are dealing here with a matter of enormous importance. Millions of people have responded to apparent graces from God being poured on mankind in an unprecedented way. Jesus has sent his Mother to earth to change people's hearts so that they turn to Him. His action is one of LOVE and all who have heard about the apparitions will, one day, stand before God and one of the things we will be asked to reflect on is how we responded to what we heard. Did we respond with love, or hatred, or fear, or in a disinterested way. We can lie to ourselves in this life but when we stand before God we will not be able to lie. We will KNOW which of the above was our reaction.

The apparitions have been occurring for over 25 years. The Church hierarchy have made no decisions about the authenticity. Do you think God wants Catholics to stay at home waiting for the hierarchy to decide for them whether the apparitions are authentic??

When Jesus came to earth 2000 years ago, did He expect people to wait for the priests to decide whether He was the Messiah or not?

I know none of this will impress you but it is the only valid way I can respond to your last posting.

God bless you.


14 posted on 01/05/2010 1:03:16 PM PST by davidtlig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: davidtlig
I hope I am not going to sound too patronising here but you come across as a well meaning person. However, you are viewing things from a legalistic standpoint as if assessing arguments in a law court. You're not coming off as patronizing, no worries about that. I agree that this is a matter of great importance - because it has great potential to affect many people's lives. I think we're just looking at it from two rather different perspectives. I'm looking at it as a seminarian, and, if God so wills it, a future priest - and so I can't really do anything but edge toward what might be considered the "party line." I can't but think that what Cardinal Schonborn did hurt the Church and more specifically, hurt the message of Medjugorje, because it has added one more level of conflict to the whole situation.

Jesus has sent his Mother to earth to change people's hearts so that they turn to Him. His action is one of LOVE and all who have heard about the apparitions will, one day, stand before God and one of the things we will be asked to reflect on is how we responded to what we heard. Did we respond with love, or hatred, or fear, or in a disinterested way. We can lie to ourselves in this life but when we stand before God we will not be able to lie.

If the apparitions at Medjugorje are true, then some have been and may continue to miss out on particular graces because of rejecting it thus far - but we must be very, very careful to suggest in any way that rejecting Medjugorje is the same as rejecting the Gospel. Everyone is free to reject a special revelation except those to whom it is given - and everyone is free to accept it provided that it doesn't contradict the Faith.

Do you think God wants Catholics to stay at home waiting for the hierarchy to decide for them whether the apparitions are authentic??

God wants Catholics to listen to their consciences, to follow His Son, and listen to the mother that He gave them on earth that is the Church.

I can tell you have a great devotion to Jesus and to our Blessed Mother through the message of Medjugorje, and I am happy for you because of that. But also, I caution you that Medjugorje cannot be the whole basis of your Faith. We have to be ready to follow Christ through His Church - even if that means rejecting Medjugorje if the Church deems it necessary. I don't think it will play out that way - I think that eventually, Medjugorje will be spoken in the same breath with Lourdes and Fatima.

But until the Church makes a decision, pay attention to Medjugorje, but cling to Christ and cling to His Church - that's at the root of what Mary is asking us to do anyways.

God bless you as well.

15 posted on 01/05/2010 3:02:03 PM PST by GCC Catholic (0bama, what are you hiding? Just show us the birth certificate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic
I'm looking at it as a seminarian, and, if God so wills it, a future priest - and so I can't really do anything but edge toward what might be considered the "party line."

Thank you for this reply and I can understand your difficult position when, sadly, there seems to me to be such a 'desire' to view Medjugorje negatively on the part of many in the hierarchy.

I remain strongly of the view that Cardinal Schonborn's intervention is important as there had been an increasing 'drift' in news about Medjugorje to present it negatively.

You can view a rather well balanced report on the Schonborn matter in the latest Catholic Herald in the UK. The link is:
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/articles/a0000720.shtml

16 posted on 01/06/2010 6:16:01 AM PST by davidtlig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: davidtlig
I am just adding here a link to a good, balanced, secular view of the Schonborn matter: http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/


17 posted on 01/07/2010 5:21:37 AM PST by davidtlig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson