Please stop analyzing me and making this about me and see if you can just answer my questions instead.
He needs "proof" of God, because that is what constitutes "certainty" for him. If he can't get "proof" of God, then he doesn't have to take Him seriously.
More mind reading. RM, please put and end to this charade, or else I will respond in kind.
[We take you momentarily to the inner sanctum of the mental spaces of the TYPICAL, generic pseudo-super-rationalist--a new feat in the impossibly difficult scientific reporting of Quix]
OF COURSE . . . y'all have to answer MY questions according to MY criteria . . . strictly according to MY context . . .
MOST SUPER STRICTLY according to MY convoluted Gordian Knotted pseudo-logic pretending to be linear . . .
HYPER STRICTLY according to MY constructions on fantasized reality . . .
VERY STRICTLY according to MY comfort zone . . .
DEFINITELY STRICTLY according to MY sensibilities . . .
HYPER-STRICTLY according to MY allowable examples in evidence . . .
VERY STRICTLY according to MY silly proof-text phrases . . .
ULTRA STRICTLY according to MY hypocritical contradictions . . .
HYPER HYPER-STRICTLY according to MY definitions, MY daffynitions and MY dictionary . . .
SUPER STRICTLY according to MY super convoluted, MY super redundant, MY super dull lines of pontificating explications . . .
VERY STRICTLY according to MY game rules . . .
HYPER STRICTLY according to MY RIGID RULES for tolerable counter-points . . .
. . .
. . .
KEEPING IN MIND . . . EVERY MICROSECOND, ALL THE SAME, THAT IT MUST !!!!!!!!!!!!NOT!!!!!!!!!!! BE ABOUT ME at all.
Of course.
What cheese would you like with your whine, troll?
Well jeepers, kosta, this thread has been "about you" for the past several hundred posts, and that didn't happen by accident. You yourself have been instigating this. As xzins noted earlier, you seem to like the attention.
As to this — my earlier statement to you —
[kosta] needs "proof" of God, because that is what constitutes "certainty" for him. If he can't get "proof" of God, then he doesn't have to take Him seriously.That's not "mind-reading," kosta. It is simply a rational conclusion drawn from a mass of evidence. I'm not trying to "get in your head" in the above; I'm simply noticing what you're actually doing....
Would you like to read my mind, kosta??? Please do feel free to try.
I have answered your questions repeatedly. It's just you reject my premises and my evidence, and so disagree with me. [BTW, I haven't really seen your premises and evidence laid out as yet, kosta.] But don't say I have tried in any way to avoid your questions. That is simply not true.