Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe; xzins; blue-duncan; Alamo-Girl
"No man can be a consistent fatalist. For to be consistent he would have to reason something like this: “If I am to die today, it will do me no good to eat, for I shall die anyway. Nor do I need to eat if I am to live many years yet, for I shall live anyway. Therefore I will not eat.” Needless to say, if God has foreordained that a man shall live, He has also foreordained that he shall be kept from the suicidal folly of refusing to eat."

Amen! I love it, Dr. E. Fatalism has no true master, but Divine predestination does. And just as you say, the recoil away from God's loving predestination comes from man's desire to be in control. That was me and so I laugh at myself for pushing away from the very thing that benefited me and could comfort me MOST. I can see a reprobate being theoretically against predestination, but the saved should embrace it. There is no higher level of security. If the saved truly trust God, then they should WANT Calvinistic predestination to be true. :)

1,220 posted on 03/13/2010 12:57:31 PM PST by Forest Keeper ((It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1006 | View Replies ]


To: Forest Keeper
There is no higher level of security.

Indeed. Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!

1,260 posted on 03/13/2010 10:11:40 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson