I think RnMomof7 is getting his info here:
Notice how RnMomof7 used the same incorrect spelling of Paris that EIPS used? Yeah, dead give away that yet another anti-Catholic is must rely on anti-Catholic websites to do their propagandizing for them. Whenever I see an anti-Catholic bring up Migne I am suspicious. How many anti-Catholics are well educated enough to actually learn any Latin? Not many.
here’s the original:
There’s also a trustworthy English translation of _Forty Gospel Homilies_ by Gregory the Great in the Cistercian Studies series (Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications), but I was too lazy to get up and walk to the next room to consult it. It was easier to get Migne from our university library’s database and translate the passages roughly myself.
Yeah, Homilarian and the 11 for II are also typos that reappear in RnMomof7’s version.
That URL can’t be RnMomof7’s source for “Gregory says all sexual desire is sinful” because our good friend Ian Paisley doesn’t say that there, at least as far as I can see. Ian’s upset that Gregory and the Church Fathers identified Mary of Bethany with the “loose woman” anointing his feet with the woman from whom Jesus cast out seven devils. Fine, one can reject that on exegetical grounds.
But Gregory doesn’t say all sexual desire is sinful. Someone else must have said that and then referred to Paisley’s site for references to the homily? The hack authority who said Gregory said all sexual desire is sinful must have read those snippets from that homily on Paisley’s site and read into it the claim that Gregory was saying all sexual desire is sinful. To read the snippets that way take more than an average dose of incomprehension.