Aaronic priesthood has to be in the lineage of Aaron? So is this the time of the Gentiles or not?
Christ was originally sent only to the house of Israel; but since that time the Gospel of Christ is primarily subscribed to by gentiles.
Also, Since it was John the Baptist himself who restored the Aaronic priesthood on May 15th, 1829 (See LDS Scripture D&C Section 13) I suppose he would it was OK.m Or do you think your opinion is more valid than his?
BUMP for the inanity of the post.
Christians do you believe this?
What's the name of the type of "logic" in which you use a flawed premise in order to support a flawed premise. A googling I shall go..... be back in a minute...
Who are you and where do you get this distorted information?
Aaronic priesthood has to be in the lineage of Aaron?
Since it was John the Baptist himself who restored the Aaronic priesthood on May 15th, 1829 (See LDS Scripture D&C Section 13) I suppose he would it was OK
- - - - — -
Yes. And there is NO NEED for a Leviticus priesthood because Christ is our sacrifice and our High Priest.
Read the Book of Hebrews.
What proof do you have that John the Baptist ‘restored’ the priesthood? None.
The aaronic priesthood ended with Christ.
Christ was originally sent only to the house of Israel; but since that time the Gospel of Christ is primarily subscribed to by gentiles.
Jesus was of the lineage of David - He could never hold an aaronic priesthood position.
Also, Since it was John the Baptist himself who restored the Aaronic priesthood on May 15th, 1829 (See LDS Scripture D&C Section 13) I suppose he would it was OK.m Or do you think your opinion is more valid than his?
No, mythology doesn't superceed biblical facts.
Really? So how do you explain why a new LDS Aaronic priest had to get a "spiritual blood transfusion".