[daniel1212]

Yes, I do indeed mean Sola Scriptura, as clarified here (again):
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2524569/posts?page=884#884 and which is derived from the Bible.

Your means of argumentation is to continue to use a misrepresentation that has often been corrected, as well to post statements that have been refuted.

Now before you post more of the same, you can respond to http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2524569/posts?page=203#203 for starters, which you ignored, and while you are at it, please tell me how (upon what basis) a person is to know for sure that the RCC is infallible?

[Cronos]

(2Tim. 3:16) states that Scripture is good, it does not state that it is ONLY scripture. And check my posts above -- what you've stated as your interpretation of Sola scriptura ties in with Church teachings on scripture -- as critical and a place for verification of truth.

Your means of argumentation is to continue to use a misrepresentation that has often been corrected, as well to post statements that have been refuted.

Post 203 -- what's the question in it?