Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD
Not much of a point to miss. Chesterton likes philosophy. He doesn’t like theology.

lots of points. one is that a such an offhanded dismissal suggests the hamster wheel in the mind might need a little oil. For Chesterton seems to indicate, of Aquinas, that philosophy develops theology. And in that, Luther was something of a Luddite.

13 posted on 06/23/2010 6:16:17 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (so far behind the curve, it's in back of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: the invisib1e hand
Philosophy does not develop theology. Wikipedia defines philosphy as such:

If one is to believe the scriptures to be the inspired word of God, then the Bible contains the answers to the fundamental problems of man. You won't find it in reason or philosophy. You will find it in the scriptures.

In Aquinas' Summa Theologica he states:

Do you believe that God is the author of the "evil which is penalty"?

It is remarkable that Aquinas could hold a whole discourse about "evil" yet never discuss sin. In fact, rarely does he quote scripture. Had he spent a little more time in the scriptures he would have discovered that we are children of evil.

According to Aquinas' Summa Theologica man is capable of distinguishing between good and evil. This is not what the scriptures teaches. Luther was right to suggest this type of philosophy should be burned.

14 posted on 06/24/2010 6:45:07 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson