You wrote:
“First off, I owned up to my own conjectures and stated them as such.”
I don’t deny that you admitted your points were mere conjecture. I don’t disagree with that at all.
“Second, your response is little more than an arrogant and bigoted pile of dung as far as either argument or instruction is concerned.”
The truth is often viewed by some who are out of touch with reality as arrogant. If you find what is true to be a “bigoted pile of dung as far as either argument or instruction is concerned” then that’s your problem.
“Your responses show you to be neither peace-loving, nor considerate, nor submissive [to the authority of Scripture], nor full of mercy and good fruit, nor impartial.”
I am absolutely submissive to scripture - hence I am not in a Protestant sect. Christ came with the sword. I do not consider the truth uncharitable. You apparently do.
I regard anyone who asserts the ‘sinlessness’ of Mary as a fool. I firmly believe there is only one who is sinless: Jesus. There is only one name by which we are saved: Jesus. There is no ‘sharing’ in that redemptive work itself, though there is sharing in Righteousness (Namely Jesus shares his with us). In as far as redemption is concerned I reject that any human helped therein, otherwise it would be quite valid to assert that Pilate is a co-redeemer with Christ for it was by his authority that Christ was put to death (though even there, that authority came from God).