To: Quix; Religion Moderator
I’m not sure how it can procede without talking about opponents perspectives . . . I think the link to the article is pretty balanced. I'm not sure why we would need to talk about other opinions, within dispensationalism there are a variety of views.
6 posted on
08/05/2010 5:16:32 PM PDT by
wmfights
(If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
To: wmfights
Fine with me.
Just don’t want to spend a lot of time on it to have it . . . pulled or trashed. LOL.
21 posted on
08/05/2010 6:06:04 PM PDT by
Quix
(THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
To: wmfights; Quix
The Dispensationists Caucus is fine, however the source biblebelievers.com is banned because it promotes Jack Chick publications.
Since you have a good conversation going, I will remove the body, source and link and edit the title to simply "Dispensationalism." If you'd rather have it pulled or locked, let me know.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson