There are so many things in error in that article one wouldn’t even know where to begin.
There are so many things in error in that article one wouldn’t even know where to begin.
Of course there are, its SATIRE, making light of modern Premillennial Dysfunctionalism's taste for finding future prophecy in places where it wasn't meant to be. If any passage can be interpreted to be future, then why can't I play the same game?