Skip to comments.
Lds Conference Talk October 1984-By Ronald E. Poelman-Mormon (OPEN)
lds-mormon.com ^
| October, 1984
| Ronald E. Poelman
Posted on 10/02/2010 12:05:50 PM PDT by greyfoxx39
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: svcw
Oh goodness and I belive you thought there was some honor well I won’t forget this fork tongue
61
posted on
10/10/2010 6:06:37 PM PDT
by
restornu
(In the OT many denies coming of the Son of God, in the NT many Denies Heavenly Father as the Father.)
To: restornu
There is no honor in lds. Good bye R.
62
posted on
10/10/2010 6:13:45 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Just in case you ever wondered: As of May 2010, it costs ~ $0.0167 US Dollars to mint a penny.)
To: svcw
63
posted on
10/10/2010 6:42:52 PM PDT
by
restornu
(In the OT many denies coming of the Son of God, in the NT many Denies Heavenly Father as the Father.)
To: Stourme
It is curious that you try this post, as if you would defend the Bible having three different but not contradictory accounts of Saul on the way to Damascus. But approximately six hours later, you try to imply the Bible is not to be trusted because there are three different accounts, and you assert that they are contradictory accounts! [
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2598634/posts?page=852#852]
Mormonism apologists are certainly a peculiar twisting and deceitful bunch. BTW, the three accounts are not at all contradictory, as two posters showed to you in response to your specious accusation regarding the Bible.
64
posted on
10/10/2010 6:44:55 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's nye impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: ejonesie22; Elsie; greyfoxx39; Colofornian; Godzilla; Osage Orange; caww; Tennessee Nana
I thought y’all might find this an interesting duplicity for an ardent LDS apologist ...
65
posted on
10/10/2010 8:00:17 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's nye impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: restornu
How very obscene of you, Resty! It says a lot about you that you would even know that video exists, much less use it at a conservative website while playing at being a devout Mormon.
66
posted on
10/10/2010 8:02:57 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's nye impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: MHGinTN
Have no clue what you are rattleing about but that is not the first time you go off the deep end!
67
posted on
10/10/2010 8:15:35 PM PDT
by
restornu
(In the OT many denies coming of the Son of God, in the NT many Denies Heavenly Father as the Father.)
To: MHGinTN; Stourme
It is curious that you try this post, as if you would defend the Bible having three different but not contradictory accounts of Saul on the way to Damascus. But approximately six hours later, you try to imply the Bible is not to be trusted because there are three different accounts, and you assert that they are contradictory accounts! [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2598634/posts?page=852#852] Most interesting MHG. well stormy - you can't have it both ways what DO you believe.
68
posted on
10/10/2010 8:38:18 PM PDT
by
Godzilla
(3-7-77)
To: restornu
You mean you don’t know what gets posted in your name? Click on the link you posted to svcw. Disgusting garbage, Resty.
69
posted on
10/10/2010 8:51:22 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's nye impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: MHGinTN
OUCH!
Good Catch!
We need to archive that one.
Best way to “win” an argument is to be on every side.
Works best when one is more interested in being “correct” than right...
70
posted on
10/10/2010 9:33:00 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
To: MHGinTN
A kid who is told to scadoodle because he is late with his term paper what is so disgusting why don’t you scadoodle!
sho sho scram...
71
posted on
10/10/2010 10:06:16 PM PDT
by
restornu
(In the OT many denies coming of the Son of God, in the NT many Denies Heavenly Father as the Father.)
To: MHGinTN
you deserve both yourself!
72
posted on
10/10/2010 10:10:59 PM PDT
by
restornu
(In the OT many denies coming of the Son of God, in the NT many Denies Heavenly Father as the Father.)
To: restornu
In the OT many denies coming of the Son of God, in the NT many Denies Heavenly Father as the Father.) What kind of MORMON teaching are you babbling about HERE?
73
posted on
10/11/2010 5:57:30 AM PDT
by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
74
posted on
10/11/2010 6:25:19 AM PDT
by
svcw
(Just in case you ever wondered: As of May 2010, it costs ~ $0.0167 US Dollars to mint a penny.)
To: Elsie
Nothing the anti are able to receive!
75
posted on
10/11/2010 6:33:29 AM PDT
by
restornu
(In the OT many denies coming of the Son of God, in the NT many Denies Heavenly Father as the Father.)
To: restornu
There is also other threads before this one was posted someone is either senile or likes to recycle!There are new FReepers to whom the message of mormon fallacies and lies should be posted early and often. I appreciate your reposting of the earlier links. Keep up the good work.
76
posted on
10/11/2010 7:20:30 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8)
To: restornu
Nothing the anti are able to receive! 
77
posted on
10/11/2010 7:26:43 AM PDT
by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: restornu
What kind of MORMON teaching are you babbling about HERE?
Some LURKing Investigators may want to know...
78
posted on
10/11/2010 7:28:11 AM PDT
by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: svcw
The fact that Latter-day Saints accept the existence of other, "Gods", in no way contradicts the accepted Christian belief in one Eternal Father (God), anymore than the existence of other mortal fathers here on earth, denies the fact that people have but one biological father. www.lds.org .
79
posted on
10/11/2010 7:37:03 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8)
To: restornu
So you endorse the langauge used int he video. Figures
80
posted on
10/11/2010 8:05:30 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's nye impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
