Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican Archbishop Burke: Public Repentance is Required for Pro-Abort Politicians
Life Site News ^ | ROME, October 12, 2010 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 10/15/2010 12:14:51 PM PDT by GonzoII

Friday October 15, 2010


Vatican Archbishop Burke: Public Repentance is Required for Pro-Abort Politicians

By John-Henry Westen

ROME, October 12, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Speaking at the Human Life International World Prayer Congress Saturday, Archbishop Raymond Burke received sustained applause when he noted that Catholic politicians who support abortion are required to repent publicly. 

Speaking to pro-life leaders from 45 nations, the Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura (the highest Vatican court) also noted that those who recognize the scandal caused by such public, dissident Catholics assist the Church in repairing a serious breach, but are nevertheless often ridiculed for it.

(Read the complete talk - in PDF format - here)

Achibishop Burke stressed that “both bishops and the faithful” must be obedient to the Magisterium – which he described as the teaching of Christ as handed down through the successor of Peter and the bishops in union with him. “When the shepherds of the flock are obedient to the Magisterium, entrusted to their exercise, then surely the members of the flock grow in obedience and proceed with Christ along the way of salvation,” he said.  “If the shepherd is not obedient the flock easily gives way to confusion and error.”

Burke, who is also a member of the Congregation for Bishops added: “A most tragic example of the lack of obedience of faith, also on the part of certain Bishops, was the response of many to the Encyclical Letter Humanae vitae of Pope Paul VI, published on July 25, 1968.  The confusion which resulted has led many Catholics into habits of sin in what pertains to the procreation and education of human life.”

Humanae Vitae reiterated age-old Christian teaching on the immorality of the use of artificial contraception. However, after its publication the encyclical was repudiated by many within the Catholic Church, including priests and bishops, who had believed that the Church would changes its views on contraception.

Turning to the issue of scandal within the Church, the archbishop said, “We find self-professed Catholics, for example, who sustain and support the right of a woman to procure the death of the infant in her womb, or the right of two persons of the same sex to the recognition which the State gives to a man and a woman who have entered into marriage.  It is not possible to be a practicing Catholic and to conduct oneself publicly in this manner.”

To resounding applause Burke said, “When a person has publicly espoused and cooperated in gravely sinful acts, leading many into confusion and error about fundamental questions of respect for human life and the integrity of marriage and the family, his repentance of such actions must also be public.”

The Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura then voiced a concern that struck a deep chord with many of the Catholic pro-life activists present at the conference.  “One of the ironies of the present situation is that the person who experiences scandal at the gravely sinful public actions of a fellow Catholic is accused of a lack of charity and of causing division within the unity of the Church,” he said.  “One sees the hand of the Father of Lies at work in the disregard for the situation of scandal or in the ridicule and even censure of those who experience scandal.”

The Vatican prelate concluded the point stating:

Lying or failing to tell the truth, however, is never a sign of charity.  A unity which is not founded on the truth of the moral law is not the unity of the Church.  The Church’s unity is founded on speaking the truth with love.  The person who experiences scandal at public actions of Catholics, which are gravely contrary to the moral law, not only does not destroy unity but invites the Church to repair what is clearly a serious breach in Her life.  Were he not to experience scandal at the public support of attacks on human life and the family, his conscience would be uninformed or dulled about the most sacred realities.

Read the complete text of the archbishop’s talk here.

See the video of the archbishop’s full talk online here.

URL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/oct/10101504.html


Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: moralabsolutes
“One sees the hand of the Father of Lies at work in the disregard for the situation of scandal or in the ridicule and even censure of those who experience scandal.”
1 posted on 10/15/2010 12:14:59 PM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; Salvation; NYer; narses; wagglebee

Ping.


2 posted on 10/15/2010 12:15:38 PM PDT by GonzoII ("That they may be one...Father")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Somebody should ask this Archbishop to explain the Roman Catholic funeral that Ted Kennedy recieved. There were numerous RC priests and bishops there acclaiming that dirt bag for a job well done.


3 posted on 10/15/2010 12:22:21 PM PDT by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

When Pelosi gets on her knees it’s not redemption she’s after.


4 posted on 10/15/2010 12:25:28 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

The lack of discipline from bishops for public Catholics who support and further baby butchery is the biggest scandal going. When bishops don’t treat abortion like what they say it is as regards Catholic pols it gives the impression that it’s not really that big a deal when you get right down to it.

I think bishop Burke is great.

FReegards


5 posted on 10/15/2010 12:51:43 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Achibishop Burke stressed that “both bishops and the faithful” must be obedient to the Magisterium – which he described as the teaching of Christ as handed down through the successor of Peter and the bishops in union with him. “When the shepherds of the flock are obedient to the Magisterium, entrusted to their exercise, then surely the members of the flock grow in obedience and proceed with Christ along the way of salvation,” he said. “If the shepherd is not obedient the flock easily gives way to confusion and error.”

Related threads:
[Archbishop] Wuerl: Why I Won't Deny Pelosi Communion
Will Denver Catholic Archbishop finally enforce Canon 915?

6 posted on 10/15/2010 12:59:07 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forgotten man
I'll tell you what it is: it's cowardice, disobedience, and practical apostasy on the part of the clergy involved, from Cardinal Sean O'Malley down to the lowliest deacon who participated in this travesty.

And this isn't the first time Abp Burke has said that priests and bishops MUST refuse to distribute Communion to public scandalous offenders (e.g. abortion ccomplices), and the abortion accomplices MUST publicly repent. But it seems to make little difference. Even though Burke is the head of the Apostolic Signatura (equiv. to Supreme Court), the others ignore him.

That's what blows my mind: the un-trumpeted, but massive and effective, defection of the higher clergy from Catholic Truth, and their treason against Catholic authority.

They are as much in mutiny as Cranmer or any other cultural chameleon/turncoat of the Reformation, except that they utterly lack the courage.

7 posted on 10/15/2010 2:13:17 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("As it is written, the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you." Romans 2:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
....this isn't the first time Abp Burke has said that priests and bishops MUST refuse to distribute Communion to public scandalous offenders (e.g. abortion ccomplices), and the abortion accomplices MUST publicly repent. But it seems to make little difference. Even though Burke is the head of the Apostolic Signatura (equiv. to Supreme Court), the others ignore him.
"...a failure to follow through, should Pelosi present herself to receive the Eucharist after being corrected (i.e. applying Canon Law 915) will only embolden her, and encourage other pro-abort politicians, other CINOs, and the (silent) liberal priests and bishops who want to re-open the Catholic cafeteria. IMO those bishops who spoke up must follow through on their words, or they will make matters worse. And if they don't, their failure will mean that Archbishop Burke will have to act against them, or else bring scandal to all.
-- Alex Murphy, August 31, 2008
Related threads:
Archbishop Burke to address National Catholic Prayer Breakfast
Did Catholic Archbishop Lose Internal Vote Over Abortion, Communion Debate?
what can a bishop do?
Catholic leaders accused of failing to enforce church law
Burkxploitation? (Archbishop Raymond Burke takes issue with Randall Terry)
Funeral Rites Should be Denied to Publicly Pro-Abort Catholics: Vatican Official [Burke] (said AFTER the Kennedy funeral)
Washington Post: Archbishop Burke ‘Kicked Upstairs’ Because of Handling of Abuse Allegations
8 posted on 10/15/2010 3:55:03 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Quite right, Alex. If there are no consequences for these bishops, the whole of moral law is exposed to contempt.


9 posted on 10/15/2010 4:32:09 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("As it is written, the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you." Romans 2:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
If there are no consequences for these bishops, the whole of moral law is exposed to contempt.

But what sort of consequences are actually available for Burke to impose? If the Catholic Church can't oust a bishop for harboring & enabling sex offenders within his archdiocese, and the Pope/Vatican/Mother Church can't be held liable for a bishop's actions, what options are still open?


"What the hell are we supposed to use, man? Harsh language?"

10 posted on 10/15/2010 4:46:46 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Mrs. Don-o; narses
I wonder if this applies to Father John Jenkins, CSC, president of Notre Dame for the pro-abortion scandal he caused?

Though it is for pro-abortion politicians, what of priests/bishops that cause scandal (and division) because of their support of pro-abortion politicians...

11 posted on 10/15/2010 6:14:10 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
I don't know much about the removal of a bishop: who can do it, why it can be done, what canon law says about it. I know it happens, but rarely. Two cases: Gaillot in France and Milingo in Zambia --- but I'm sure there have been others.

I suspect the most effective thing lay people could do would be to expose their acts and use the power of the press to denounce them. They might be shamed into resigning.

12 posted on 10/15/2010 6:17:09 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Lord help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
I don't know much about the removal of a bishop: who can do it, why it can be done, what canon law says about it....I suspect the most effective thing lay people could do would be to expose their acts and use the power of the press to denounce them. They might be shamed into resigning.

Have you forgotten who you're talking to? Said lay people would be mercilessly hounded and branded as "virulent anti-Catholic bigots".

13 posted on 10/15/2010 8:10:54 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
I'll get back to you later on this (I'm out the door for the day) --- but FReeoer Catyholics themselves expose and denounce bad clerics. Surely you've noticed this. People do get indignant though, and rightly so, if it looks like non-Catholics doing a relentless focus on "bad Catholics." I would feel the same if there were Catholic posters focusing relentlessly on "bad Protestants." For instance, posting junk on pastor-adulterers and pastor-embezzlers and egregious heretics.

More later.

14 posted on 10/16/2010 4:38:15 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Lord help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson