Posted on 11/05/2010 7:10:28 AM PDT by wmfights
The emerging, or emergent, church movement takes its name from the idea that as culture changes, a new church should emerge in response. In this case, it is a response by various church leaders to the current era of post-modernism. Although post-modernism began in the 1950s, the church didn't really seek to conform to its tenets until the 1990s. Post-modernism can be thought of as a dissolution of "cold, hard fact" in favor of "warm, fuzzy subjectivity." The emerging / emergent church movement can be thought of the same way.
The emerging / emergent church movement falls into line with basic post-modernist thinking—it is about experience over reason, subjectivity over objectivity, spirituality over religion, images over words, outward over inward, feelings over truth. These are reactions to modernism and are thought to be necessary in order to actively engage contemporary culture. This movement is still fairly new, though, so there is not yet a standard method of "doing" church amongst the groups choosing to take a post-modern mindset. In fact, the emerging church rejects any standard methodology for doing anything. Therefore, there is a huge range of how far groups take a post-modernist approach to Christianity. Some groups go only a little way in order to impact their community for Christ, and remain biblically sound. Most groups, however, embrace post-modernist thinking, which eventually leads to a very liberal, loose translation of the Bible. This, in turn, lends to liberal doctrine and theology.
For example, because experience is valued more highly than reason, truth becomes relative. Relativism opens up all kinds of problems, as it destroys the standard that the Bible contains absolute truth, negating the belief that biblical truth can be absolute. If the Bible is not our source for absolute truth, and personal experience is allowed to define and interpret what truth actually is, a saving faith in Jesus Christ is rendered meaningless.
Another area where the emerging / emergent church movement has become anti-biblical is its focus on ecumenism. Unity among people coming from different religious and ethnic backgrounds and diversity in the expression of corporate worship are a strong focus of the emergent church movement. Being ecumenical means that compromise is taking place, and this results in a watering down of Scripture in favor of not offending an apostate. This is in direct opposition to passages such as Revelation 2:14-17, Jesus' letter to the church of Pergamum, in which the Church is warned against tolerating those who teach false doctrine.
False doctrine seems to abound within the emerging / emergent church movement, though, as stated previously, not within every group espousing emerging / emergent church beliefs. Because of this, care must be taken when deciding whether or not to become involved with an emergent church group. We all need to take heed of Matthew 7:15-20, "Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them."
While seeking new ways to witness to a changing culture is admirable, utilizing ways which compromise the Truth of the Gospel in any way is nothing more than promoting false doctrine and leading others away from Christ instead of to Him.
Yes, they were blind.
whose Catholic principles were formulated by the Second Vatican Council in 1964.
And they formulated Catholic principles in 1964, 54 years later and with a ONE WAY sign attached, all pointing to Rome and Protestants moving toward HER by accepting HER principles and beliefs. There is no room for compromise with Rome, as the Second Vatican Council made clear. So we are left with unity, ecumenism, as defined by the "Dogma of Ecumenism," no. 4 that I just gave you. Seems that Rome thinks She is in the driver's seat on Ecumenism.
The Church has been emergent and emerging for 2000 years.
>>into the unity of the one and only Church<<
One world religion you say?
That’s what it seems they’re going for...like lemmings..happy, happy lemmings. {sigh}...
Indeed. I would hate to believe in something that could be called, say, the "One holy, catholic, and apostilic Church."
That would be bad.
Indeed. I would hate to believe in something that could be called, say, the "One holy, catholic, and apostolic Church."
That would be bad.
Yes. If it were an apostate church, with a different gospel, and another Christ, it would be bad. No matter how many lemmings claimed membership.
And yet in many cases -- e.g., as exemplified by Rob Bell and Donald Miller, to name a couple of emerging church types -- it is none of that.
What I see, is an author nitpicking on doctrine, and some other folks apparently disliking the approach those folks are using to take the Gospel out into the world.
Well, as I noted above -- Jesus had something to say about folks like that.
Perhaps you need to take a deep breath, step back, and look at what those guys are doing.
I linked to a couple of excellent books, above. Give 'em a read, and then come back and tell me about "emerging churches."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.