[Quix]

I did.

We’ve done so on FR many, many times.

Still REPLACEMENTARIANS

seem to prefer to peddle falsehoods about that as they do about Scriptural truths.

[mas cerveza por favor]

Please provide documentation of anyone who interpreted the Bible as dispensationalist prior to John Darby.
I did. We’ve done so on FR many, many times.

I doubt that because in the 1800 years of glorious Christian civilization prior to Darby, there were no dispensationalists. He and CI Scofield were 19th Century revivalist hucksters peddling religious novelty. Tim LaHaye and John Hagee continue the lucrative $cam.

[GiovannaNicoletta]

You have, I have, and others have, repeatedly.

It's one of those unfortunate facts, like the Scriptural doctrine of the Rapture (which has also been posted numerous times), and the indisputable Scripture which makes it more than clear that God has not abandoned His chosen people and never will, which totally nuke their false doctrines so they simply refuse to acknowledge either the Scripture or the accounts of the Christians who came before before their crutch John Darby who believed the Bible as God wrote it rather than how Origen and other fallen men decided to re-write it to make it more to their liking.

It's that simple. They can't deal with the truth because it demolishes their entire world, so they discard it.