Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth is to Be Found Nowhere Else But in The Catholic Church, The Sole Depository of....
Against Heresies (Book III, Chapter 4) (New Advent) ^ | 185AD | St. Irenaeus

Posted on 12/10/2010 9:27:36 AM PST by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: ArrogantBustard
How many of the folks replying indignantly have actually read either the article, or the publication date?

Once you've read the title with the assertion: ("The Truth is to Be Found Nowhere Else But in The Catholic Church"), the rest really doesn't need to be read, does it?

21 posted on 12/10/2010 10:19:42 AM PST by Conservative Tsunami
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: November 2010
The one true church is that of Christ, all true Christians regardless of denomination. Christ should be the focus, not denomination.

AMEN!

22 posted on 12/10/2010 10:21:27 AM PST by Conservative Tsunami
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: November 2010

Who EXACTLY sold indulgences in the Middle Ages?


23 posted on 12/10/2010 10:21:27 AM PST by vladimir998 (The anti-Catholic will now evade or lie. Watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Make your point. I don’t understand it.


24 posted on 12/10/2010 10:23:00 AM PST by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: November 2010

I asked a simple question. Who sold indulgences in the Middle Ages? Name the people who did it. You say other would not stand with them. How many of these sellers or indulgences were there?


25 posted on 12/10/2010 10:28:34 AM PST by vladimir998 (The anti-Catholic will now evade or lie. Watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Leroy Whitby. Franklin Xu. Moonbeam Zappa. And the infamous Chuck Mucklow. Standing against them were the Rock, Ginger Spice and Howdy Doody.


26 posted on 12/10/2010 10:30:50 AM PST by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
No, it means that Scripture is given to us by the Church...

2 Timothy 3:16
 All scripture is given by inspiration of God,
and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof,
for correction,
for instruction in righteousness:
17  That the man of God may be perfect,
throughly furnished unto all good works.

27 posted on 12/10/2010 10:35:56 AM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Isaiah 59:1  ¶Behold, the LORD'S hand is not shortened)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

True...but who compiled and created the canon of scripture?


28 posted on 12/10/2010 10:55:59 AM PST by Carpe Cerevisi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“No, it means that Scripture is given to us by the Church, to whom is entrusted its authentic interpretation.”

The blasphemy is scary. I continue to be amazed that so many Freepers are staunchly committed to strict adherence to the Constitution. It would be nice if they had the same respect for the Scriptures.


29 posted on 12/10/2010 11:00:59 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Tsunami
the rest really doesn't need to be read, does it?

Your comment sounds a lot like: "Don't confuse me with the facts ... my mind is already made up".

30 posted on 12/10/2010 11:05:49 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

LOL!


31 posted on 12/10/2010 11:09:58 AM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

What a lovely post ! Please ping all the usual Mormon bashers to this thread. They band together to label the Mormons “a cult”; it’d be enjoyable to see them “hoist on their own petard”.


32 posted on 12/10/2010 11:11:01 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Here in Texas, many Baptists still don’t realize at one point we all came from the SAME Church.

I love pointing out a bit of history. I get looks like I just told them Aunt Gertie was a Nazi :)


33 posted on 12/10/2010 11:12:31 AM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimt

You mkae lots of assumptions ... when you gain wisdom, the assumptions will melt away. You might even learn that the god of Mormonism and the jesus of Mormonism are not the same as the God and Jesus of the Bible. ... But i doubt seriously that such is in your future.


34 posted on 12/10/2010 11:15:40 AM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
The early church fathers were very insightful and worth reading, but they are not infallible. Their writings contain contradictions and errors. Clement of Rome wrote about the Phoenix as a real bird. I understand that scientific truth is different than doctrinal truth, but there are internal contradictions throughout their writings.

It is possible to pick and choose points they made, but tracing ideas to the early church fathers is not the same as tracing them to the apostles.

Some may act otherwise, but the catechism and doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church are not infallible. The Roman Catholic Church may contain errors and falsehoods.

According to the Roman Catholic Church, there are only a few select statements that are infallible. I think either a council or a Pope can make an infallible statement, but each has special rules.

The Scriptures are without error or contradiction. They are of a different order. Most Scripture is easy to understand. For difficult Scriptures, a main point can often be gleamed while accepting an imperfect understanding. However, we should be able to flip our focus and say "I may not understand what it does mean, but I do understand what it doesn't mean."

I think we can agree on 4 givens: Perfect God, Perfect Scripture, imperfect man and imperfect interpretation.

How can the idea of perfect interpretation be based on the imperfect interpretations of imperfect writings of imperfect men with imperfect knowledge? Seriously.

The early church fathers understood the universal church as those who are saved. The universal faith as that which saves and will not be burned away on judgment day. The use of the word Catholic by the early church fathers did not point to the earthly, temporal structure of the Roman Catholic Church, but to perfection and eternity.

In 180 AD, Irenaeus wrote in "Against Heresies", that "the Catholic Church possesses one and the same faith throughout the whole world." The correct interpretation is that there exists one faith that leads to salvation. Those who share the true faith are part of the Universal Church.

To use Irenaeus' statement to support an earthly, temporal authority is a clear example of imperfect interpretation.

35 posted on 12/10/2010 11:16:32 AM PST by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Your comment sounds a lot like: "Don't confuse me with the facts ... my mind is already made up".

As a matter of fact Christ's own words are "fact" more than enough for me.

Does Scripture often confuse you?

36 posted on 12/10/2010 11:16:44 AM PST by Conservative Tsunami
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
BLASPHEMY.

LOL. It kills me that some so-called Christian 2,000 years later has the gall to call St. Irenaeus a blasphemer. You do realize that Irenaus was a mere two generations from Christ and heard St. Polycarp who was himself a disciple of St. John the Evangelist.
37 posted on 12/10/2010 11:17:48 AM PST by Antoninus (Fair warning: If Romney's the GOP nominee in 2012, I'm looking for a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
The blasphemy is scary. I continue to be amazed that so many Freepers are staunchly committed to strict adherence to the Constitution. It would be nice if they had the same respect for the Scriptures.

Great analogy.

38 posted on 12/10/2010 11:17:52 AM PST by Conservative Tsunami
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Keep in mind this was before the Great Schism so the term Catholic included the Church of the East.


39 posted on 12/10/2010 11:27:34 AM PST by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
The blasphemy is scary. I continue to be amazed that so many Freepers are staunchly committed to strict adherence to the Constitution. It would be nice if they had the same respect for the Scriptures.

I love it when claims like this are made. Most evangelicals only claim to follow strict adherence to the Bible. Instead, they impose truly wacky interpretations on Sacred Scripture to make it fit their beliefs and their position in opposition to the Church. For example, I'll bet you don't take Our Lord literally when he said:

"For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed."
40 posted on 12/10/2010 11:28:21 AM PST by Antoninus (Fair warning: If Romney's the GOP nominee in 2012, I'm looking for a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson