Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54
So, if I’m reading the dispensational interpretation of Matthew 24 correctly (and I admit I may not be), there will be “saved” but non-resurrected Jews and gentiles on the earth during the “thousand years,” is that correct?

That would be the normal dispensational view ... yes.

53 posted on 12/16/2010 8:55:13 AM PST by dartuser ("The difference between genius and stupidity is genius has limits.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: dartuser
That would be the normal dispensational view ... yes.

So what was it about my description of the dispensational kingdom that you objected to?

If you have mortal believers inhabiting your millennial kingdom, then you still have to deal with sin and death and misery. People naturally grow old and die (as indicated in Isaiah 65). And we know that sin is still present since Satan is able to turn the nations and amass a huge army to go up against the camp of the saints at the end (Rev. 20).

You said that I “have no clue what the dispensationalist believes.” But yet I have just articulated what appears to be the common dispensational theology on the situation in the millennial kingdom.

So, where’s the beef?

54 posted on 12/16/2010 9:19:07 AM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- like crack for the eschatologically naive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson