Posted on 04/12/2011 10:18:26 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
JERUSALEM (Reuters) Could two of the nails used to crucify Jesus have been discovered in a 2,000-year-old tomb in Jerusalem?
And could they have mysteriously disappeared for 20 years, only to turn up by chance in a Tel Aviv laboratory?
That is the premise of the new documentary film "The Nails of the Cross" by veteran investigator Simcha Jacobovici, which even before its release has prompted debate in the Holy Land.
The film follows three years of research during which Jacobovici presents his assertions -- some based on empirical data, others requiring much imagination and a leap of faith.
He hails the find as historic, but most experts and scholars contacted by Reuters dismissed his case as far-fetched, some calling it a publicity stunt.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
After his trip to the Vatican, Martin Luther commented that he saw enough “nails from the cross” to shoe every horse in Europe.
Folks will come out to Worship the Nails. Mankind is an idol factory - they will worship anything other than the Lord God unless there is a compulsion like Salvation to do so.
That's a lot of nails. Maybe the Romans used extra nails, because Jesus wouldn't stay on the cross?
Very true. And very sad as well. People are always searching for something. It's evident everyday throughout the world.
Thats Arnold after his 7th Mr. Olympia! I’m serious!
...next on Pawn Stars! Will the old man make a deal for the divine nails?
>> After his trip to the Vatican, Martin Luther commented that he saw enough nails from the cross to shoe every horse in Europe. <<
Funny thing is, Luther never discovered that the Vatican wasn’t in Rome. That’s right: It’s across the river from the ancient city of Rome, making “Pilgrim’s Progress” and the phrase “crossing the Tiber” kinda funny.
Luther never went to Rome. He just needed every form of vicious slander Satan could dream up for him.
Now, Erasmus stated similarly that if every relic of the True Cross were really from the Cross, the Jews must’ve cleared every Cedar in the Forests of Lebanon. There are splinters of the cross in literally hundreds of churches. The splinters weigh a fraction of a gram, typically. The cross probably weighed 100 kg, or 100,000 grams. Luther was a slanderer; Erasmus was a fool.
"The Naked Archaeologist" is kind of a fun program to watch occasionally.
Just fact-checking my previous statement, I found this:
“There is no abbey so poor as not to have a specimen. In some places there are large fragments, as at the Holy Chapel in Paris, at Poitiers, and at Rome, where a good-sized crucifix is said to have been made of it. In brief, if all the pieces that could be found were collected together, they would make a big ship-load. Yet the Gospel testifies that a single man was able to carry it.”
Calvin, Traité Des Reliques.
Conflicting with this is the finding of Charles Rohault de Fleury, who, in his Mémoire sur les instruments de la Passion 1870 made a study of the relics in reference to the criticisms of Calvin and Erasmus. He drew up a catalogue of all known relics of the True Cross showing that, in spite of what various authors have claimed, the fragments of the Cross brought together again would not reach one-third that of a cross which has been supposed to have been three or four meters in height, with transverse branch of two meters wide, proportions not at all abnormal. He calculated: supposing the Cross to have been of pine-wood (based on his microscopic analysis of the fragments) and giving it a weight of about seventy-five kilograms, we find the original volume of the cross to be .178 cubic meters. The total known volume of known relics of the True Cross, according to his catalogue, amounts to approximately .004 cubic meters (more specifically 3,942,000 cubic millimeters), leaving a volume of .174 cubic meters lost, destroyed, or otherwise unaccounted for
(For the record, the Rohault wasn’t perfect, either: The splinters that have been found to have been olive, not pine.)
Luther’s battle against popery was a battle against Satan not for him.
massgopguy, this answer isn’t to you, I’m just tacking onto the end of the last post!
The nails aren’t the issue...the man on the cross is. It never ceases to amaze me that people want to worship the relics and not God.
Ya gotta love this stuff. I have the original pistol that Hitler shot himself with. I’d be willing to sell it for the right price, limited 2 per buyer. you must act quickly. For the first 100 buyers we will throw in the original poison capsule used by Eva Braun. (That is what discoveries like these remind me of.)
Simcha is entertaining, but this is no subject for a schlockumentary.
Yeah I needs to get busy making some ancient relics to sell myself.
Nobody is worshiping the relics, the Catholics are in this regard smarter than the holy rollers mocking them.
You don’t have any property in Arizona? Mayhaps with a nice ocean view?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.