LOL, Yes I’ll assume you don’t have kids and you do thrust your views onto others and you know what it does matter if you ave kids because you are passing judgment onto a couple you have no clue about, you’ve never been in that situation therefore it is easier to pass judgment when you have not walked in others shoes.
Until you have then you view would be more respected.
Also your faith is what you want to live by then fine by don’t think your faith is the supreme faith where others have to go by it,. I suggest you get more upset over those in your faith who never live by their faith as there are millions, including homosexual Priests touching little boys.
You wrote:
“LOL, Yes I’ll assume you don’t have kids”
Since it is completely irrelevant either way it doesn’t really matter what you assume there now does it?
“and you do thrust your views onto others”
So, posting views is not thrusting my views on others? Aren’t you just as guilty for posting your own? Wouldn’t that be hypocrisy on your part then too? Did that even occur to you?
“and you know what it does matter if you ave kids because you are passing judgment onto a couple you have no clue about,”
Wow, what a leap in logic you make. First of all, I am not passing judgment on any couple by stating the truth. I did not condemn their souls nor does any human being have the power to do so. I, however, like anyone else can state the obvious when wrongdoing is done. If Kate Middleton had an abortion, it would be wrong. If I said so, that would simply be telling the truth and it would not be passing judgment. Now, all of that remains absolutely true whether I have five kids or none, whether I lost a child to crib death or am sterile, whther I have ten kids of my own or a blend family of six like the Brady Bunch! The truth simply doesn’t change depending upon how many children I have; and having children, or not having children, make me no more or less likely to pass judgment on someone. What your putting forward is illogical, irrational and just plain silly.
“you’ve never been in that situation therefore it is easier to pass judgment when you have not walked in others shoes.”
So, you’re now claiming that having children is walking in the shoes of Kate and William? Do you realize how utterly nonsensical that sounds?
“Until you have then you view would be more respected.”
By whom? Only illogical, emotional driven people could possibly think there is a relationship between being a parent and knowing Kate and William or at least knowing the rightness of their actions when they contradict constant Christian teaching. Seriously, how does the one connect to the other? Kate and William do not have children. By your own illogic that would mean they could never evaluate their own actions until they have kids. Do you realize how bizarre what you’re putting forward is?
“Also your faith is what you want to live by then fine by don’t think your faith is the supreme faith where others have to go by it,.”
Wait. Again you are confusing one issue with another. I have every right to tell the truth all I want. If you - or anyone else - doesn’t want to hear it, then don’t read it.
“I suggest you get more upset over those in your faith who never live by their faith as there are millions, including homosexual Priests touching little boys.”
Gee, does someone have to have children to get upset about that or can they just assume truth is truth and abusing children is wrong even if they don’t have any children themselves?
Do you see how illogical your ideas are?