Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presbyterians meet in Memphis, seal deal on ordaining women
Commercial Waters ^ | 24 Jun 2011 | David Waters

Posted on 06/24/2011 10:49:07 PM PDT by Cronos

A small but fast-growing Presbyterian denomination meeting this week in Memphis resolved long-standing theological and constitutional conflicts over the ordination of women that have vexed and divided evangelical Christians for decades.

A record-setting 460 delegates to the Evangelical Presbyterian Church's 31st General Assembly voted to allow congregations to call women to ordained ministry, even if their presbytery (governing body) objects for theological or doctrinal reasons....

(Excerpt) Read more at commercialappeal.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: epc; evangelical; feminaziagenda; feminism; homosexualagenda; lesbonaziagenda; orthodoxpresybterian; presbyterian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Salvation

I doubt that Presbyterians would. Their beliefs are too different from Orthodox-Catholic-Coptic-Armenian-Lutheran-Anglican beliefs. Pentecostals are closer.


21 posted on 06/25/2011 3:09:31 PM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I understand what you are saying. Do you think Methodists and Pentacostals will then be next? Or the Baptists and Evangelicals?

Just having fun with predictions.


22 posted on 06/25/2011 4:08:24 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Cronos

You’ve pretty well nailed the order of the next dominos (maybe denominoes?) to fall:

Methodist (already a lot of agitation for the gay agenda)
Pentecostal (overemphasis on Holy Spirit’s gifts makes easy prey for “new revelations”)
Evangelical (becoming increasingly “worldly”—especially progressives)
Baptist.

Possible to have female clergy without the gay agenda? So far so good for the Lutheran Congregations in Mission for Christ (10 years and holding); North American Lutheran Church, and Anglican Church in North America.


23 posted on 06/25/2011 7:26:18 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lightman
So far so good for the Lutheran Congregations in Mission for Christ (10 years and holding); North American Lutheran Church, and Anglican Church in North America.

But how do you manage? Seriously? On the one hand my secular mind thinks that women should have more leadership rules, on the other my religious mind says that Paul says clearly no and my (admittedly prejudiced) logic sees first women, then gays. How does one stop it? I pray the LCMC and NALC do not go down this way, but the logic used by the gays was "scripture says no to women pastors, but you did, so why not us?" -- and I admit I'd be unable to give an answer.

24 posted on 06/25/2011 9:28:46 PM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lightman; Salvation
Seriously lightman -- I know you said Possible to have female clergy without the gay agenda? So far so good for the Lutheran Congregations in Mission for Christ (10 years and holding); North American Lutheran Church, and Anglican Church in North America.

And I pray that this experiment is successful, but I have strong fears that the next stage is gay married pastorettes.

My, admittedly prejudiced eyes, see first letting in female clergy as the first step. Is this a wrong belief?

I believe women should play more and more of a role, but baulk at them being pastoresses. Don't get me wrong -- in my humble opinion and in my 30+ years of life experience, women are on average far more devout and holier than men -- the sex ratio in heaven could be extremely skewed!

25 posted on 06/26/2011 9:42:48 PM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I do not disagree that female clergy can become part of the slippery slope, particularly when the only rationalization for their Ordination is “justice”.

Another point along that slope is the acceptance of clergy who have remarried after divorce. On that issue, the LCMC has done no better than the ELCA. The NALC Executive Council was charged with presenting a paper on that issue to the next NALC assembly—keep in mind, NALC is not quite one year old.

The ACNA has taken the hardest line: divorced persons who seek to serve as clergy must have their cases heard by the Archbishop and fitness for service is determined on a case by case basis. No carte blanche....and that is how it should be, IMHO.


26 posted on 06/27/2011 10:34:35 AM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lightman
well, I think pastors who remarry after divorce should be a flat no.

Divorce is pushing it as it is -- divorce is not an option imho (very non-pc I know)

About female ordination -- how does one not make it about "justice"? And how does one reconcile this with Paul's teachings?

27 posted on 06/27/2011 11:01:02 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lightman

I really think that allowing remarried pastors is just a sign of an inevitable slide. Don’t you think so? This should not be allowed. of course we’re all flawed beings, but no


28 posted on 06/28/2011 2:34:24 PM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Remarriage after divorce might be considered for those who were the innocent party in what I call the “four A’s”—abuse, abandonment, adultery, or addictions.

Otherwise, no go.


29 posted on 06/28/2011 2:54:37 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lightman

I’m sorry to disagree, but even if one is the victim of these, remarriage is a no-no. The person is still married to the person who left them, divorce or no divorce


30 posted on 06/29/2011 12:29:04 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson