They both destroy societies. Homosexual marriage is an oxymoron—it creates the Marxist “logic” that men and women are exactly the same—interchangeable....it is a Marxist Lie to destroy the family structure....create the worldview that children do not need biological parents. Then the detached children will have no biological connections—it destroys their idea that there is a God who had a teleological design for nature.
It destroys logic and reason since children are taught that there is no design to the sex organs...it is stupid and creates a non-logical way to look at nature—an atheist, evolutionary—life is random sort of idiocy with no design. Children grow up with no common sense which only exists when understanding how nature works-—cause and effect. Homosexuality is a complete denial of cause and effect. It elevates emotion above intellect.
Homosexuality also divides the sexes—heterosexual marriage is the only true method of uniting the sexes and making sure biological children have parents that won’t be apt to molest or harm them. The genetic interest has a “nurturing” aspect to it—and although much less in man—marriage is the only way to attach men to their biological offspring. At least, in all cultures, the one man, one woman paradigm has been the most successful at raising emotionally and physically healthy children who can relate to all people, not just one sex.
It also is an illogical, unnatural use of the body which commodifies it. Homosexual acts are demeaning and disease-causing and reduces sex to a self-pleasuring artificial nihilism. It dead ends society into oblivion and meaninglessness.
Polygamy makes women into breeding cattle with less importance than the male. It is creating unequal worth of male to female, that will damage the perception of equality of the sexes especially in children. One man to one woman equalizes the sexes at the same time it acknowledges the biological differences which biology and science prove. Homosexual marriage denies reality and science and raises “urges” and “feelings” above science and reason. If a society gives rights to “urges” no matter how bizarre, then they will get everything including pederasty...because there will be always someone with the urge to sodomize boys.
Dear Savage:
I think I detect more animosity to homosexual marriage than polygamy in your tone and certainily in the amount of words devoted to the subject.
And I’m sure you don’t really mean that women in a polygamous marriage breed cattle but that it is symbolism for the way you perceive their life. I seem to remember that some societies, including the Indians, Chinese and other Asian cultures, Muslims, and even the Jewishy Biblical Patriarchs, have practiced polygamy.
I didn’t even throw in polyandry, since its occurrence is rarer, found mostly in the Himmalayas (no pun intended)and in some areas of Oceania, Africa and Native America.
In America, we legalize both serial polygamy and polyandry. It’s called divorcegamey.