“No one is REVERSING JESUS FOR THE DEVIL here.”
Oh really?
Apparently you did not read the lead post for this thread very carefully. Please go back and compare the Puritan’s Bible (1599 Geneva) foonotes to the Modernist interpretation (1978 Ryrie).
Again, the Modernists REVERSED Jesus at the Cross to a future-to-us Devil. This had never been done before Darby.
This is a DOCUMENTED FACT.
I pray that you will repent of your dispensational sin.
Lovingly, In Christ.
You speak in weird ways - not plain English - “REVERSED Jesus at the Cross to a future-to-us Devil”.
What are you trying to say? That the translation or translators or people with a certain ‘blind’ interpretation are taking the passage in Daniel to somehow equate to the Antichrist what you feel should be accurately attributible to Christ?
It’s a strange stretch you have there as if ‘Modernists’ are somehow NOT stating Christ’s once-and-for-all atonement on the Cross, NOR that He ALONE is the ONLY Way, Truth and Life and He ALONE can forgive sins by His blood shed.
No one here is confusing Christ’s redemptive work. So for you to take one passage and call all who disagree with you regarding an End Times/Not-End-Times specific point as NOT born of the Spirit is dangerous to do.
Additionally, what exactly are you saying regarding the AntiChrist - when will his time be? Are you saying he WON’T make a deceitful covenant with the Jews who are wrongly looking for The Messiah? You DO realize that their deception has much to do with their blindness in thinking atonement with sacrifices must still be made - thus the nature of the discussion regarding the AoD standing in the Temple?
NONSENSE.
MANGLING SCRIPTURE IS ALWAYS NONSENSE.