Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Salvation

Some folks simply need to be informed as to “why” the changes were made.

These translations are “formal”, whereas the prior translations were not.
Previously, they were only intend to “convey the intent”.

These formal translations are richer in meaning and content.

To be better informed, you may be interested in the Magnificat, Roman Missal Companion - $4

>http://www.magnificat.com/romanmissal/roman_missal_companion.asp<


5 posted on 12/16/2011 8:17:36 PM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry

Good recommendation.


7 posted on 12/16/2011 8:24:39 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry
These translations are “formal”, whereas the prior translations were not.

Previously, they were only intend to “convey the intent”.

Strictly speaking, the prior translations were intended to obscure and contradict the intent of the liturgy, not convey it. That's why the old hippies are so peeved now. That darned hierarchy in Rome is shoe-horning the meaning of the Mass back into it, undoing all their hard work of softening the Mass and making it meaningless.

Was that Bishop Troutman being referred to? That old heretic should protest the changes by taking a vow of silence. It would be a penance for him, alas, but not for us.

14 posted on 12/16/2011 9:34:31 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson