Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Moore Goes On Anti-Catholic Twitter Rant, Distorts Contraception Debate
Andrew Brietbart's Big Hollywood ^ | February 10, 2012 | John Nolte

Posted on 02/11/2012 12:28:50 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

According to Michael Moore’s tweet (and everyone on MSNBC and CNN), President Barack Obama is correct to force the Catholic Church to offer insurance that provides free birth control, sterilization, and the Morning After abortion pill — because “the law is clear” about “equal access to birth control for all women no matter where they work.”

Really? There’s a right to free birth control through your employer? Liar.

But what Moore is doing here is what Obama and his media minions are doing. They’re turning a government mandate that violates the First Amendment into a “rights” issue.

What Obama is attempting to do to the Catholic Church is no different than creating a federal mandate that would require every Islamic-run business to provide pork rinds in their vending machines — because people have a right to equal access to fat free foods.

(TWEETS AT LINK)

Note all the Catholic Church-bashing Moore’s engages in....

(Excerpt) Read more at bighollywood.breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: catholics; contraception; michaelmoore; obama
What happened to the country my late father fought for in World War II, Korea and Vietnam? Why is this blob of suet allowed to have an oversize say in our culture?
1 posted on 02/11/2012 12:28:56 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
According to Michael Moore’s tweet (and everyone on MSNBC and CNN), President Barack Obama is correct to force the Catholic Church to offer insurance that provides free birth control, sterilization, and the Morning After abortion pill — because “the law is clear” about “equal access to birth control for all women no matter where they work.”

God's Law trumps man's law every single time, fatso.

2 posted on 02/11/2012 12:32:00 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What chaps me about that fat freak is that he’s not at all ignorant of the truth he’s deliberately lying. Definitely a Leni Riefenstahl for the American communist movement.


3 posted on 02/11/2012 12:44:41 AM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

We fat freaks take umbrage at your depiction of Mr. Moore as one of us....

4 posted on 02/11/2012 1:08:40 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
My apologies!!! lol

It is certainly not his size that offends me.

5 posted on 02/11/2012 1:26:04 AM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Shame on you, Mr. Bush, shame on you. And, whenever you've got the Pope against you, your time is up.”
-- Michael Moore, 2003 Oscar acceptance speech

Having second thoughts, Mikey?

6 posted on 02/11/2012 1:43:22 AM PST by BillyBoy (Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Glad the fundamental issue is not being overlooked: “free exercise” is MY INDIVIDUAL RIGHT and it trumps some invisibly penumbral “right” to have sex without its natural consequences (as if that promise was even possible, btw).

This is the moment when an American emperor tried to redefine our fundamental freedoms by an edict that creates a new fundamental and pervasive “right” to free “reproductive services” (how many rights require expenditures by others, btw?).

Bravo to our shepherds for framing this aspect of the issue: “Our concern remains strong that the government is creating its own definitions of who is ‘religious enough’ for full protection. Secular employers must provide coverage for contraception, sterilization and abortion inducing drugs...It seems clear there is no exemption for Catholic and other individuals who work for secular employers; for such individuals who own or operate a business; or for employers who have a moral (not religious) objection to some procedures such as the abortifacient drug Ella. This presents a grave moral problem that must be addressed, and it is unclear whether this combination of policies creates a mandate for contraception, sterilization and abortion inducing drugs covering more of the U.S. population than originally proposed.”

As God enjoys the irony, the seemingly (let us pray) watershed issue for the bishops is the right to follow a fundamental Church teaching that the clergy have largely failed to teach (as the media love to point out with surveys on use of the Pill). We can thank God if indeed this confluence of events has made the defense of Humanae Vitae of palpably prime importance to the entire hierarchy.


7 posted on 02/11/2012 2:17:06 AM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

And Bush served for another 5 years afterwards.


8 posted on 02/11/2012 2:19:32 AM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Exactly, a rabid red propagandist of the most despicable kind.

He and his comrades are running interference for the communist dictator that occupies the White House.

Problem for the American communists movement is that they are making their boldest attempt yet to subvert the church, but don't have enough storm troopers.

The Church is too big, and not scared of a skinny muslim communist from Kenya

9 posted on 02/11/2012 2:46:50 AM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Someone please show me in the Obamacare law where it says everyone is entitled to Birth Control.

I do not believe it is in there.

This isn’t law, this is a ruling from a bureaucrat.


10 posted on 02/11/2012 3:34:18 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
This isn’t law, this is a ruling from a bureaucrat.

Which, as I understand it, is what we discovered to be in the bill. i.e. three bureaus of the executive branch (Labor, Treasury and HHS) are given the power to implement the law as they see fit.

Remember Bart Stupak? He raised the objection over what he saw as the very possibility of what Obama rolled out. He was a"assured" that would not happen. He voted "ate".

btw, has anyone heard from Bart?

11 posted on 02/11/2012 3:55:00 AM PST by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Somebody feed that boy 10 pounds of DECON RAT POISON please.

LLS


12 posted on 02/11/2012 3:55:32 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Fat free pork rinds?


13 posted on 02/11/2012 4:07:00 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Stupak was "assured" by my congressman, (Rep Mike Doyle, D, PA-14). He sealed the deal and convinced Stupak to vote "aye."

My Bishop, Zubik, started much of the opposition to Obama's dictum with a letter to the Diocese of Pittsburgh.

I have suggested that the Bishop issue an excommunication edict against Doyle for his actions.

But the Bishop has chickened out.

14 posted on 02/11/2012 4:23:50 AM PST by eCSMaster (Excommunicate evildoers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet


15 posted on 02/11/2012 5:45:38 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

I pray they continue to be bold and show their true intentions as that is the only way to expose them for what they really are.


16 posted on 02/11/2012 7:18:41 AM PST by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

**What Obama is attempting to do to the Catholic Church is no different than creating a federal mandate that would require every Islamic-run business to provide pork rinds in their vending machines — because people have a right to equal access to fat free foods.**

Yeah, Obama, why don’t you mandate this?


17 posted on 02/11/2012 9:32:46 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Propaganda king.

I find it somewhat satisfying to make any and all of our amoral, politically correct superiors realize their lack of total control over Christians when Christians decide to deny them that power.

It’s good for Christians to see the ultimate weakness of Mikey’s socialist government machinery lording over them as individuals in life. Mikey needs to move to China and even with the communist police machinery, they still can’t make all the Christians to be as insane and evil as they are. Communists can not sustain their atheist social ideal in the face of uppity Christians speaking and acting as Christians.


18 posted on 02/11/2012 6:09:42 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson