Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB; metmom; allmendream; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; tpanther; Gordon Greene; Ethan Clive Osgoode; ...
I feel this to be an adequate overall explanation of the differences of viewpoint, so any further “strawmanning” on your part will be taken to be simple dishonesty.

Very well and very clearly stated, MrB.

"allmendream" has shown himself historically to be one of the more simplistically dishonest, if not cognitively bereft posters on this board in general and on this topic specifically.

A moth to the flame.

FReegards!


162 posted on 02/22/2012 6:51:38 AM PST by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Agamemnon
This isn't about me.

Care to address any of the points I made.

Hitler was a Creationist who believed in fixed kinds.

The Soviet Communists rejected Darwin's theory in favor of a Lamarkian mechanism.

Creationists claim to not accept evolution and the (semi)common descent of species - except when they helpfully explain how it all happened at many hundreds of times the rate observed in evolutionary biology.

Creationists claim to accept ‘micro’-evolution when they fell it is politic to do so - but then helpfully explain how any such mechanism is absolutely impossible - and that every useful DNA variation that ever existed was created and placed in the genome of the primordial “kinds”.

And are Creationists incapable of standing behind their own words without pinging a dozen or more of their amen chorus?

163 posted on 02/22/2012 7:00:21 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson