Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian Scriptures, Jewish Commentary
Catholic World Report ^ | March 6, 2012 | Carl Olson

Posted on 03/06/2012 3:23:10 PM PST by NYer

The recently published Jewish Annotated New Testament (Oxford University Press, 2011), marks the first time, as the volume’s Preface states, “that Jewish scholars have annotated and written essays on the complete New Testament.” It is co-edited by Dr. Amy-Jill Levine, professor of New Testament and Jewish Studies at Vanderbilt University Divinity School, and Dr. Marc Zvi Brettler, who is Dora Golding Professor of Biblical Studies at Brandeis University.

I recently interviewed the two by e-mail about the volume: how it came about, what is unique about it, and how it might contribute to Catholic-Jewish dialogue. (My review of the Jewish Annotated New Testament appeared in the March 4, 2012, issue of Our Sunday Visitor newspaper.)

Catholic World Report: How and why did this project come about? 

Dr. Brettler:  About fifteen years ago, I co-edited the Jewish Study Bible for Oxford University Press with Adele Berlin.  After finishing that project, I thought of producing a Jewish Annotated New Testament using the same format: Jewish contributors would provide annotations and short essays on background material.  Since I work primarily in the Scriptures of Israel (the Tanakh, or the Hebrew Bible), I needed a co-editor with expertise in Christian origins. Oxford and I agreed that, given her knowledge of the New Testament, her familiarity with early Judaism and its writings, and her involvement in Jewish-Christian relations, Amy-Jill Levine would be the ideal candidate.

CWR: How did you decide upon contributors? What criteria were set for contributors to follow in writing their commentary? 

Dr. Levine and Dr. Brettler: We sought people who had the relevant academic expertise: contributors who had formally studied the New Testament and were familiar with New Testament scholarship; knowledge of the period of Christian origins including familiarity not only with Roman history but also with the extensive Jewish sources (not only the Hebrew and Aramaic of the Tanakh, but also the Dead Sea Scrolls, the writings of Philo and Josephus, Rabbinic materials, the Targumim (Aramaic translations and paraphrases of the books of the Tanakh, etc.); knowledge of the Greek of the New Testament and the Septuagint (the early Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible as well as the Deuterocanonical texts) as well as with the Hebrew of the Tanakh. We sought Jewish commentators who would have sensitivity to questions Jews today might ask about the text and awareness of the interpretations that have impacted Jewish-Christian relations over the centuries.

CWR: You note in the Preface that there are points of disagreement among the editors and contributors; what are some of the significant points of debate and disagreement?

Dr. Levine and Dr. Brettler: People have been interpreting the New Testament since it was written, and even when stories about Jesus were told by the earliest apostles. There will inevitably be different interpretations. The few disagreements tended to be those that appear in general New Testament studies: how many of the letters attributed to Paul were actually written by Paul as opposed to being later texts written in his name; the date of the book of Revelation; the types of communities to which the Gospels are addressed. As editors, we felt that it was best not to insist on our own opinions on these theses issues, but to let the readers see a variety of reasonable interpretations.

CWR: Who is the primary intended readership?

Dr. Levine and Dr. Brettler:
We have three major audiences in mind.

First, we would like Jews to read the New Testament. Some Jews hesitate out of concern that the text is anti-Jewish, and there are indeed problematic passages: Matthew’s insistence that “all the people” cried out, “His blood be on us and on our children”; John’s reference to the “Jews” as “from your father, the Devil”; Paul’s comment in 1 Thessalonians that the “Jews…killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets,” and so on. For these readers, the annotations explain how these texts came to be written, as well as how Christians over the centuries have interpreted them. We felt that Jewish readers might be more comfortable reading the New Testament if it dealt explicitly with such issues, and if the annotations and essays were written entirely by Jews, so it was clear that the volume was not intending to proselytize.

Some Jews might nevertheless demur, because they are unaware of the relevance of the text for Jewish history. Much if not all of the New Testament is Jewish literature, and all of it is relevant for understanding Jewish history. The New Testament sheds important light on early Jewish life and literature, from women’s social roles to the practice of halakhah to relations with Rome to the meaning of apocalyptic texts.

Another rationale for Jews reading the New Testament the volume is respect.  If we Jews want Christians to respect Judaism, which includes knowing more about us than Adam Sandler’s “Hannukah Song,” we owe the church the same respect, and that respect includes knowing what is in the Christian canon as well as its reception history.

Second, the volume will benefit Christians who are interested in the origins of the church: how Jesus’ Jewish audience would have understood the parables; how Jesus’ interpretation of Torah and his ethical teachings fit within first-century Judaism; how proclamations of Jesus’ divinity could be accepted by early Jews, and how understandings of the “messiah” change over time.

Uninformed Christian interpretation was another prompt for the volume. We wanted a resource for the overworked priest, volunteer Sunday School teacher, and untrained youth leader that would correct the anti-Jewish stereotypes heard in churches, Bible studies, and elsewhere the Gospel is preached. We know from our own experiences—casual conversations, encounters in the classroom and church adult education programs, reading Christian literature targeted to the laity—where many of the problems lie. The volume flags the stereotypes, shows why they are wrong, and provides alternative ways of reading the text so that the Gospel is not heard as a message of hate.

For example, we address the major negative stereotypes that surface among readers ignorant of Judaism, including the common canard of the Old Testament-Jewish God of wrath vs. the New Testament God of love; the incorrect insistence that the Synagogue promotes retributive violence via “an eye for an eye” whereas the Church promotes restorative justice via “turning the other cheek” (the rabbis interpret “an eye for an eye” in terms of monetary payment, not bodily mutilation); the claims that first-century Judaism makes the Taliban look progressive and that Jesus and Paul argued for an egalitarian system over against Jewish sexism; the belief that all Jews were looking for a violent military messiah who would expel the Romans from Jerusalem, and so they rejected Jesus because he counseled peace; the idea that Judaism was xenophobic and the Church invented universalism, and so on.

We appreciate that many preachers and teachers no longer hold these views, but our experience suggests that some continue to do so, and we feel it is important to correct these historically inaccurate ideas. Along with side-bars on the more problematic texts, the volume offers thirty essays on such topics as how Jewish law was practiced, who the Pharisees were, what Jewish women’s lives were like, how Jews understood themselves in relation to the question “Who is my neighbor?, and so on.

The volume thus shows Jews and Christians our common roots—this would be expected, since Jesus, all of his earliest followers, and Paul were also Jews—as well as the reasons why we came to separate.

Third, anyone interested in history or theology should find this book of value. Secular readers who want to understand the New Testament in its historical context will appreciate the notes and the thirty essays. Readers interested in how the Scriptures of Israel have been understood by Jews and Christians—topics such as Adam and Eve, Abraham, Moses, the Prophets—will find fascinating details in this volume. And readers who want to understand Jewish-Christian relations over the centuries could find no better source for discussion. 

CWR: How might Catholic readers, in particular, benefit and learn from it? 

Dr. Levine: On the general topic of Jewish-Christian relations, the Catholic Church has been in the forefront of providing guidelines on how to teach and preach about Jews and Judaism. This volume compliments these efforts. We are also attentive to matters that Jews and Catholics hold in common: the ongoing interpretation of the shared Scripture (Old Testament/Tanakh); the concern for ritual; the role of Law; the relation of the New and Old Testaments.

CWR: In addition to being the first annotated New Testament written entirely by Jewish scholars, what are some of the other unique or notable qualities of this volume? 

Dr. Levine and Dr. Brettler: This is the first annotated New Testament that fully contextualizes the New Testament in terms of both all the relevant Jewish and Greek sources of the period; it is the first to provide the detailed information on that context, as well as on how Jews have understood both Jesus and Paul over the past 2,000 years; it is the first to be intentional about addressing matters of Jewish-Christian relations; it is the first to highlight connections both between the New Testament and the Hebrew Bible and between the New Testament and later Jewish literature.

CWR: What are some of the main concerns or challenges that Jewish readers face in approaching the New Testament?

Dr. Levine and Dr. Brettler: Some will be unfamiliar with basic Christian concepts (therefore, we provide annotations on baptism, Eucharist, resurrection, etc.); some might be concerned with passages that have led to anti-Jewish views (therefore, we provide historical and theological commentary); some might be unfamiliar with the stories and theologies that stand behind the New Testament as well as the stories and theologies that have developed from it (therefore, we show how the text is related to the Tanakh, to Jewish history, and to Jewish theology). Ideally, the Jewish reader will come away with a sense of what the great Lutheran theologian and biblical scholar, Krister Stendahl, called, “holy envy,” the ability to find meaning in a text or a tradition not one’s own. 

Judaism cannot be fully understood without an understanding of the New Testament and its interpretation, since at so many points and times in history, Judaism developed within a Christian milieu. Therefore, Jewish readers can see in this text both a recovery of early Jewish history and the points at which Church and Synagogue parted.

CWR: How have changes in Jewish-Christian relations in the past few decades paved the way for this sort of scholarly work?

Dr. Levine: When I first started studying the New Testament, a relative asked me why I would read such a hateful, anti-Jewish book. I asked her if she had read it. “No,” she responded, “why would I read such a hateful, anti-Jewish book?” When I first entered my Ph.D. program in New Testament, I was not permitted to teach New Testament to Masters of Divinity candidates because I am a Jew. But times have changed. We now have a significant number of Jewish scholars with expertise in the New Testament and its context—enough to produce a Jewish Annotated New Testament. We now recognize that the New Testament is essential reading for the doing of Jewish history; we can come to the table of interfaith conversation with mutual respect, and with the ability to agree to disagree.

To show the change in Jewish-Christian relations, and especially Jewish-Catholic relations: I am the New Testament book review editor of the Catholic Biblical Quarterly and have served on the executive committee of the Catholic Biblical Association; I have done numerous programs for seminarians (Catholic and Protestant) on avoiding anti-Jewish teaching and preaching; and I have also addressed the Italian Bishops’ Conference on the relation of Jesus to Judaism.

CWR: What hopes do you have for The Jewish Annotated New Testament as far as furthering a healthy and meaningful inter-religious dialogue? 

Dr. Levine and Dr. Brettler: Perhaps the day will come when we can all better learn about, understand, and respect our neighbor’s tradition, and in developing that respect, come to an even deeper appreciation of what our own tradition teaches. We have edited and contributed to this volume as a step toward that day.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ecumenism; Judaism
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/06/2012 3:23:17 PM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; SumProVita; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 03/06/2012 3:24:00 PM PST by NYer (He who hides in his heart the remembrance of wrongs is like a man who feeds a snake on his chest. St)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Thanks for this — I’m making a note to get it! :)


3 posted on 03/06/2012 3:31:32 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Interesting. I go to a lot of their sources when I dig already.

FYI: I don’t know if you’ve listened to talks at Hebrew Catholic:

http://hebrewcatholic.org/Studies/MysteryofIsraelChurch/mysteryofisraela.html

Someone at the Institute for Catholic Culture turned me on to it a while back re: salvation history and prophecy.


4 posted on 03/06/2012 3:47:33 PM PST by AliVeritas (Pray. God's will be done. Abortion leaves two victims, the mother and the child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
I have read Roy Schoeman's book Salvation is from the Jews and exchanged a few emails with him.
5 posted on 03/06/2012 4:32:55 PM PST by NYer (He who hides in his heart the remembrance of wrongs is like a man who feeds a snake on his chest. St)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
A number of the folks at my synagogue are very high on this, I think since A.J.Levine was a shared "scholar in residence" with neighboring churches last year. (I was unfortunately away so I did not participate.)

There are people who call themselves "Jews for Jesus," who strike me as frauds. (The ones I've talked to know next to nothing about Judaism.) But I've met others who refer to themselves as "Messianic Jews," (including in Israel) and they seem to me to be very much Jewish. (If you ask them something offhand about Torah, they know it.) This guy, David H. Stern, strikes me as the latter sort. He has translated the Christian Bible into Jewish English in a way that you probably can only understand if you read it. (E.g. phylacteries are tefillin, etc.) And he has written a companion volume, Jewish New Testament Commentary, which I am also glad I own. (Though I continue to prefer Christian Bible to New Testament.)

ML/NJ

6 posted on 03/06/2012 4:48:58 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

About $24 from Amazon but check out author’s previous book first.


7 posted on 03/06/2012 5:07:55 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; All

What a coincidence! I just got my copy in the mail TODAY!


8 posted on 03/06/2012 6:02:39 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Unless this is written by Messianic Jews for Messianic Jews what possible use is it? Why would anyone use a bible commentary written by unregenerate people? Talk about useless.


9 posted on 03/07/2012 1:26:17 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

There’s nothing anti-Jewish in the New Testament, so why is there a perception it has to be clarified?

How exactly are they clarifying the resurrection?


10 posted on 03/07/2012 2:30:21 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Considering he entire Bible was written by Jews, why is additional Jewish commentary required? Jesus Christ Himself is King of the Jews.


11 posted on 03/07/2012 2:32:20 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
"Considering he entire Bible was written by Jews,"

Except for the books of Luke and Acts.

12 posted on 03/07/2012 4:47:43 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: circlecity; vladimir998
Unless this is written by Messianic Jews for Messianic Jews what possible use is it? Why would anyone use a bible commentary written by unregenerate people? Talk about useless.

The person to ask is vladimir998 who, according to his post directly above yours, just received his copy in the mail. Look forward to the response :-)

13 posted on 03/07/2012 5:24:41 AM PST by NYer (He who hides in his heart the remembrance of wrongs is like a man who feeds a snake on his chest. St)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: circlecity; NYer

You wrote:

“Unless this is written by Messianic Jews for Messianic Jews what possible use is it? Why would anyone use a bible commentary written by unregenerate people? Talk about useless.”

No, it’s useful. I have only paged through it at this point - I just got it yesterday afterall - but I know it could be quite useful. The footnotes are filled with fascinating details and references to dozens of ancient Jewish documents. There are also a number of essays, tables, and a glossary.

I do not expect to learn doctrine from it - it’s written by “unregenerate people” as you say. I do, however, expect that I will learn quite a good deal about the cultural and historical contexts of the New Testament.

By the way, I do not assume that “Messianic Jews” would necessarily produce something much better than any good study Bible already out there. Messianic Jews are just Protestants with Judaizing tendencies. If I want the fullness of understaning about Christianity I first go to Catholic and Orthodox commentaries.


14 posted on 03/07/2012 5:51:03 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

See post 14.


15 posted on 03/07/2012 5:52:18 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
"No, it’s useful. I have only paged through it at this point - I just got it yesterday afterall - but I know it could be quite useful. The footnotes are filled with fascinating details and references to dozens of ancient Jewish documents. There are also a number of essays, tables, and a glossary."

So, it's essentially a book of ancient Jewish history and culture organized by bible verses. I can see the utility of that. What contemporary sources do they use other than Joesephus, Philo and the Mishnah?

16 posted on 03/07/2012 6:01:09 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

The list of abbreviations for the sources used is 7 pages long. You’ll have to look at it. Go to Amazon. Type in the title of the book. Open the “Search Inside This Book” feature. Type in “List of Abbreviations” at the “Search inside this Book” box and you’ll see a list of all the ancient the sources used.


17 posted on 03/07/2012 7:21:03 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NYer; vladimir998; dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; ...
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

An interesting project. Don't want to get into disputes, but the Jewish Study Bible is based on JPS translations, I've actually gifted it on a couple occasions to Christians who wanted to read Jewish translations of the Tanakh. Not commentary. So in my mind Brettler is credible. As to commentary, in the JSB commentary isn't much more than long footnotes. Since vladimir998 has an copy of this book, I'd be curious if that's the case here as well. As to those who comment what's the point, or to who, I kind of agree, but there's always value in these projects.

18 posted on 03/07/2012 4:06:31 PM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Bmarked


19 posted on 03/07/2012 7:12:38 PM PST by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28, Romans 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Jewish Annotated New Testament (Oxford University Press, 2011), marks the first time, as the volume’s Preface states, “that Jewish scholars have annotated and written essays on the complete New Testament.”

And the work of David Stern is chopped liver ?

The Complete Jewish Bible &
Jewish New Testament Commentary
from fifteen years ago.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
20 posted on 03/07/2012 8:11:51 PM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

“why is additional Jewish commentary required?”

Sorry, that’s a lame question. You may as well ask why is ANY commentary needed? (TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE!!!)

Show me a preacher, who never studies commentaries on the Bible, and I’ll show you a really ignorant preacher.

Ignorance of the Jewish context of the New Testament is, and has been, an ongoing problem with Christians. This book sounds like it could be a very helpful resource.


21 posted on 03/07/2012 9:15:52 PM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
Why would anyone use a bible commentary written by unregenerate people?

Pretty non-sensical statement, don't you think?

Why would God have the Jews take gold from their evil slave-master Egyptians during the Exodus?

(BECAUSE IT WAS GOOD GOLD!!!)

Same principle applies to education and knowledge. Do you ONLY go to Christian doctors...or Christian hospitals? Did you or your loved ones ONLY get taught by Christian teachers at Christian schools and Christian colleges? Only buy things from Christian stores (otherwise if you bought stuff from unregenerate people, it would be useless, right?)?

Many great discoveries in archaeology...and even biblical commentary....were done by non-Christians. Would you take what they said with a grain of salt (since after all, they don't believe in Jesus...) of course--but, their insights may well be outstanding about the cultural context of the New Testament.

Shouldn't you ALWAYS read critically....even of Christian scholars?

Again, plundering the gold-of-Egypt principle... Pagans CAN give you good things, even good knowledge, as all truth is God's truth. One just needs to read and study commentators as an adult...that is critically, and not believe everything you read.

22 posted on 03/07/2012 9:44:25 PM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Dr. Luke may well of been Jewish too, nobody really knows. Being a scholar of 1st Century Palestine, he certainly knew more about 1st Century Jewish practices and customs than any Gentile alive today...


23 posted on 03/07/2012 9:51:28 PM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
"Many great discoveries in archaeology...and even biblical commentary....were done by non-Christians."

Yes to the former, never to the latter. There is nothing a non-Christian can tell us about scripture. About history and culture, yes, but not about scripture. It is spiritually discerned. To think otherwise is "non-sensical".

24 posted on 03/08/2012 1:13:47 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
There is nothing a non-Christian can tell us about scripture. About history and culture, yes, but not about scripture. It is spiritually discerned. To think otherwise is "non-sensical".

Saving faith is surely only discerned from Scripture by the power of the Holy Spirit. However solid facts about language, grammar, genre, poetry, history, and other elements of of the Bible?

I wonder which bible verse you can cite that says that God can never teach us anything about His Word the bible, EXCEPT through regenerate Christians?

To limit God in ways He doesn't limit Himself is the definition of nonsense. And a prescription for ignorance.

25 posted on 03/08/2012 7:13:06 AM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
"I wonder which bible verse you can cite that says that God can never teach us anything about His Word the bible,"

1 Cor. chapts 1 & 2.

26 posted on 03/08/2012 8:58:55 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson