Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Great Britain, can Christians be fired for wearing a cross? (Archbishop calls cross 'Jewelry')
American Thinker ^ | 03/12/2012 | Rick Moran

Posted on 03/13/2012 6:31:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Well, sure. Why not? After all, unlike the Muslim hijab, there is no "requirement" that Christians wear a cross, says the British government.

______________________

In what is bound to be a controversial move, the British government is set to argue at the European Court of Human Rights that Christians do not have the right to wear a cross or crucifix openly at work.

Critics are already calling it another blow to Christianity for restricting its symbols of faith while granting special status to symbols of other religions such as the Sikh turban and kara (bracelet), or the Muslim hijab.

The London Telegraph has revealed ministers will argue that because it is not a "requirement" of the Christian faith, employers can ban the wearing of the cross and sack workers who insist on doing so.

Judges in Strasbourg will hear the test case on religious freedom in Britain later this year. It will bring together four separate cases, including that of Nadia Eweida, who works for British Airways. Her case dates from 2006 when she was suspended for refusing to take off the cross which her employers claimed breached BA's uniform code.

In a surprise move Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, added fuel to the fire when he said the cross for many Christians is little more than jewellery, "which religious people make and hang on to" as a substitute for true faith.

_____________________

Williams also wants to see sharia law in Great Britain so anything he says about his own faith can be dismissed as the rantings of a lunatic.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: britain; cross; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
As an aside, what is the correct spelling of the word anyway? J-E-W-E-L-R-Y ? or jewellery ?
1 posted on 03/13/2012 6:31:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Take the Christians to the Colosseum and bring in the LIONS!
2 posted on 03/13/2012 6:37:45 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Moslems aren't required to wear scarfs as a religious matter ~ that's strictly cultural ~ secular if you will.

In much of East Africa Copts have a cross tattooed between the eyes so they won't forget who they are.

Once more the English authorities imagine the world revolves on their dime.

3 posted on 03/13/2012 6:42:56 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Archbishop is right. When taking religion completely out of the arguement, the archbishop wins. If I were a non-muslim getting a photo I.D. and tried to cover my hair/face with a headscarf, I would be asked to remove it. On the other hand, if I was wearing a modest necklace, would I be asked to remove it? I don’t think so.


4 posted on 03/13/2012 6:44:26 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

When you take religion completely out of the argument, what is an ‘archbishop’?


5 posted on 03/13/2012 6:46:26 AM PDT by agere_contra ("Debt is the foundation of destruction" : Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"The London Telegraph has revealed ministers will argue that because it is not a "requirement" of the Christian faith"

What would these people know about what is and isn't a "requirement" of the Christian faith? My bible instructs me to follow my conscience and if an individual's conscience require them to wear a cross in order to remember to keep God's precepts in all their thoughts and actions then it is a requirement.

6 posted on 03/13/2012 6:46:35 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m looking up for the big “reset” asteroid.


7 posted on 03/13/2012 6:48:20 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

When you take religion completely out of the argument, what is an ‘archbishop’?

a person who has a good point.


8 posted on 03/13/2012 6:50:28 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Instead of bombing Iran, we should bomb London for trying to destroy Western Civilization. I guess we don’t need to,though. Having there crappy country destroyed will be punishment enough.


9 posted on 03/13/2012 6:53:21 AM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

RE: Requirement

What about the FREEDOM to wear what one wants within the bounds of societal decency?

It isn’t a requirement that I wear Green on a day that isn’t Saint Patrick’s Day... what then? I should be fired if I do?


10 posted on 03/13/2012 6:55:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In a surprise move Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, added fuel to the fire when he said the cross for many Christians is little more than jewellery

This, from the same guy who submits to the idea that shariah law in Britain is "inevitable."

Sounds like a case of making nice to the future overlords. Well... your new masters will still want you dead, Mr. Williams.

11 posted on 03/13/2012 6:58:07 AM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

“... when you take religion completely out... what is an archbishop?”

Excellent, excellent point! Wouldn’t an archbishop also NOT be necessary to be a Christian? Wouldn’t he just be “jewelry” to a church?


12 posted on 03/13/2012 6:58:55 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"The CROSS for many christians is little more than jewellery"

Rowan Williams
Archbishop of Canterbury

13 posted on 03/13/2012 7:10:46 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("When even casual sex requires a state welfare program, you're pretty much done for." ~Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"The CROSS for many christians is little more than jewellery"

Rowan Williams
Archbishop of Canterbury

14 posted on 03/13/2012 7:10:46 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("When even casual sex requires a state welfare program, you're pretty much done for." ~Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

Where are the soccer hooligans when they are needed?


15 posted on 03/13/2012 7:12:19 AM PDT by hal ogen (1st Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg
On the other hand, if I was wearing a modest necklace, would I be asked to remove it? I don’t think so

The air stewardess mentioned in the article was asked to forced to remove her modest little cross/crucifix necklace.

16 posted on 03/13/2012 7:14:20 AM PDT by agere_contra ("Debt is the foundation of destruction" : Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

Williams is certainly no true successor to the apostles: he is (as you say!) a piece of increasingly meaningless jewelry wrapped tightly around the neck of a Potemkin church.


17 posted on 03/13/2012 7:19:55 AM PDT by agere_contra ("Debt is the foundation of destruction" : Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Would it be a sin (spiritual or temporal) to tattoo a cross to your cheek?


18 posted on 03/13/2012 7:40:31 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Archbishop of Canterbury, added fuel to the fire when he said the cross for many Christians is little more than [ jewelry ], which religious people make and hang on to as a substitute for true faith.

This man needs a seminary revisit at the very least; a reading of Roman Catholic Dogma should be a necessity as well.

But then, the Vatican NewChurch accepted his return to the flock without the condition of the Holy Sacraments of Penance and Baptism.

God save us from the blasphemy and heresy now commonplace in the halls of the Vatican, and its' leaderhip ranks throughout the world. Heavenly Father, save the faithful from the 'ordained' evil.

19 posted on 03/13/2012 8:45:13 AM PDT by Robert Drobot (Fiat voluntas tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

??

Source please.


20 posted on 03/13/2012 9:00:13 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson