Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America’s Catholic Colony [Ecumenical]
Catholic.com ^ | september 2009 | Matthew E. Bunson

Posted on 07/07/2012 7:46:27 PM PDT by Salvation

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
In 1708, there were 2,974 Catholics in Maryland out of a total population of 40,000. By 1785, there were 15,800 Catholics, making them the largest group of Catholics anywhere in the colonies.
1 posted on 07/07/2012 7:46:39 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...

Adding to the history of Catholicims in early America.


2 posted on 07/07/2012 7:49:49 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; Religion Moderator
This is a Ecumenical thread.

Please follow the Guidelines of the Religion Moderator when posting on this thread.

Basically it means no antagonism.

3 posted on 07/07/2012 7:51:31 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
America’s Catholic Colony [Ecumenical]
The Catholic Church in the United States of America [Ecumenical]
Catholic Founding Fathers - The Carroll Family [Ecumenical]
Charles Carroll, founding father and "an exemplar of Catholic and republican virtue" [Ecumenical]

4 posted on 07/07/2012 7:59:13 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Just to the north, William Penn’s “holy experiment” of toleration combined with disestablishment placed all faiths on an equal footing, to the relief of some and to the chagrin of others.


5 posted on 07/07/2012 8:04:58 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Yes, I think that was mentioned in the thread that refers to the United States of America in the title.

Also has all the missions founded by Father Junipero Serra in California.

PS. Don’t tell them that their cities in California have Catholic names. LOL!


6 posted on 07/07/2012 8:14:39 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
What you have to do first is read through the Treaty of London (1604).

That's where the Roman Catholic King of North America (and a bunch of other stuff) divided the continent among various parties for settlement.

He, not the English, set aside a rather drought ridden, desolate, almost abandoned piece of territory called Virginia, to Protestants!

Catholics got the rest of the place ~ at the time he carved out Acadia for Scotland he had hopes for a Catholic King.

Even today it's not exactly clear how the English came to think of Virginia as THEIRS ~ so you'll have to read a lot more of that treaty.

BTW, the TREATY was crammed down the other powers throats. It was called Treaty of London since that is where the King of Spain thought a good place to meet to decide such matters ~ there were cartographers, expert explorers, etc.

The King of Spain specifically prohibited the Dutch from benefitting from all of this and set rules of reciprocal religious toleration for both Catholics and Protestants.

ANYWAY, history always marches on so by 1624, just before the blow up known as the Thirty Years War, there was a Protestant Dutch colony at New York, a Catholic Dutch colony at New Jersey (which seems to have started out long before the Spanish evacuated the region). The English had several settlements in diverse place. By 1638 there was also a Swedish colony in SE PA and Central Maryland.(relocated from Delaware)

All through the period of early settlement ~ for about a century and a half, King Philippe III's rules prevailed in both Catholic and Protestant territories in the Americas. IN Europe the final settlement of the 30 years war led to a different sort of toleration. But, America was huge, wild and wonderful so much of this really didn't matter.

To a degree the Spanish decree that all of North America be Catholic except that part set aside for Virginia prevailed right down to the very end when their own colonies sought independence. Still, when Mexico succeeded Spain, they kept that rule on Texas ~ you had to be Catholic to live in Texas ~ else you had the 3 month visitation rule.

Now, think of the problem the English, Swedish, Dutch and others had with the situation in America. The whole place was Catholic except a very small part reserved for them by the King of Spain. Worse, they held it under the stipulations established by the king ~ and that included a period of reciprocity due Catholic merchants, etc. Anyone else was excluded according to the rule set by the KIng of Spain.

Which means that the English, et al, probably didn't think all that much about it! Nor did the Catholics consider it all that terribly important either. They were free to go to zones set aside by the kIng of spain ~ e.g. to Canada, to Acadia, to New Spain ~ ...... ~ it's all in that Treaty the King of Spain imposed on America when he carved it up to facilitate development.

7 posted on 07/07/2012 8:16:32 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Still, PA still required that you be a member of a Quaker congregation to run for elective office ~ hence that obscure phrase in the US Constitution about “no religious test’ ~ that is aimed directly at PA and no other place.


8 posted on 07/07/2012 8:18:29 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

bump


9 posted on 07/07/2012 8:19:22 PM PDT by TxBec (Keep all 14 of the victims at Fort Hood in your prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

** Roman Catholic King of North America **

I’ve never heard of that term before. Source, please.


10 posted on 07/07/2012 8:19:22 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

who pray tell is this “Roman Catholic King of North America”?


11 posted on 07/07/2012 8:20:11 PM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

That really only lasted until the German immigration began in earnest in the 1740’s.

Tensions rose between Quaker Philadelphia and the rest of the colony which have never really resolved.


12 posted on 07/07/2012 8:23:24 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Another error in the article consists of failure of the writer to recognize the boundary between Acadia and Virginia. That is roughly the current NY state line extended into New England along the 42nd parallel to the point of Cape Cod. Everything to the North was Acadia. Everything to the South was Virginia until you get to the Virginia/North Carolina border. Virginia ended in the West at an invisible line drawn from point to point from the highest peaks in the Appalachian Mountains.

There were actual boundary markers placed on the mountains and in other places. As late as 1618 the Spanish were still at work drawing the Acadia line ~ see reports on a place called Spanish Hill PA ~

That Acadia line is very important because most of what we call Massachusetts was part of Acadia, but the future Plymouth Plantation was South of the line.

Thanks to war, subtrefuge, money ~ etc. England was able to extend its range of settlement North of the Acadia line and South of the North Carolina line.

13 posted on 07/07/2012 8:29:18 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Spain discovered America. The King of Spain was given title to half the globe. He and his successors were KIngs of North America. One rather famous fellow named Philippe I/II of Spain was actually King of England for a while. His son Philippe II/III of Spain mandated the Treaty of London (1604)

America, in its entirity, was a Catholic Colony of Spain for well over a century. Then a small enclave was carved out for Protestants. Although Philippe III didn't become less Catholic, he became more realistic than his father ~ and thought Peace worth more than controlling how Protestants said their prayers ~ in fact, he had more than the Dutch to worry about since the Hapsburg empire encompassed more than few Protestant areas.

I think the two things Catholics should beware of is discounting the influence of Catholicism in the settlement of America. And, in discounting the influence of Protestant theories of religious tolerance in making it possible for Catholics to live inside the King of Spain's Protestant zone of control.

Today religious tolerance is expected throughout the Americas ~ it existed in only one small place in 1604.

14 posted on 07/07/2012 8:38:13 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lightman
The German immigration was tightly controlled. On the other hand the Quaker immigration didn't begin until 1700 ~ and by 1701 all the Swedes, Norwegians, Danes, Suomi and Sa'ami had relocated from Eastern PA to York county and New York to escape the Quakers.

The Shenandoah Valley in Virginia was opened up for settlement by disquieted Germans from Pennsylvania

15 posted on 07/07/2012 8:40:34 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
The Americas were held by Spain. The King was Catholic. Not only was he Catholic, the King of Spain organized the Catholic League that drove the Moslems from the Mediterranean.

He was actually quite popular in a strange sort of way, and certainly well respected.

For a period he was King of England.

His son, however, sought to eliminate disputes and carved up North America among his favorites, and others.

The Protestant Reformation in Spain was stopped in its tracks when The King of Spain allowed ALL the priestly orders to conduct missions in the Americas. In Spain you had all the noble families (Which was where the priests came from) leading the Protestant Reformation ~

16 posted on 07/07/2012 8:47:59 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Bump for Sunday reading!


17 posted on 07/07/2012 8:54:37 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
In 1645, an English tobacco trader by the name of Richard Ingle, enraged by the seizure of one of his ships by the Palatinate Of Maryland, sailed from England with a force of men aboard the ship Reformation to the capital, St. Mary's City. He laid siege upon it, succeeded in forcing Proprietary Governor Leonard Calvert to flee for safety into Virginia. Calvert was Royalist and Catholic. Ingle was Parliamentarian and Protestant.

Ingle, with one ship and his men, completely took over the government of the Palatinate Of Maryland for over a year. He confiscated property and assets from numerous wealthy Royalist Catholic settlers in order to pay for the loss of his ship and its cargo. He captured two Jesuit priests and took them in chains back to London.

Just a little semi-obscure Maryland history for you. My paternal line came to Maryland in the mid-1600's. I know the history quite well. Mr. ingle's attack was not the only one, there was also something of an inter-colonial war with Rhode Island, again going back to Royalist and Parliamentarian strife. In many ways, the English Civil War was played out upon these shores as well.

To paint the conflicts of the era as strictly religious in nature may play well to modern ears, but it is not entirely accurate. It was political through and through. That the two sides were Catholic and Protestant was secondary.

Furthermore, there would never have even been a Palatinate of Maryland without the sympathies of a Protestant. Perhaps he merely wanted them out of England as some cynics have claimed, or perhaps this was a budding sign of the religious tolerance and freedom of religion to come, upon which this nation was founded.

It's also entirely possible that both were true.

18 posted on 07/07/2012 8:58:14 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Sirius Lee; lilycicero; MaryLou1; glock rocks; JPG; Monkey Face; RIghtwardHo; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


19 posted on 07/07/2012 9:09:55 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Very interesting. Thank you for posting it.


20 posted on 07/08/2012 3:38:07 AM PDT by sneakers (Go Sheriff Joe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson