Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer
"The Cardinal used a ‘baby killing” Biblical reference directly in defense of Gaza children."

If the Church cannot speak on behalf of the victims of violence irrespective of the sins of their fathers then they will have no credibility when they condemn abortion. If you do not recognize the children of Gaza as innocent children of God then I feel deeply sorry for you. Whatever religion you profess I am glad that I am not a member of it because I am a Christian and my God is a loving God.

Peace be with you.

176 posted on 11/22/2012 6:02:03 PM PST by Natural Law (Jesus did not leave us a Bible, He left us a Church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: Natural Law

“Whatever religion you profess I am glad that I am not a member of it because I am a Christian and my God is a loving God.”

What we were discussing is whether the Cardinal said what he apparently said that you do not wish to acknowledge.

Now that it is multiply sourced, you take the false “It’s for the children” high-road after having been caught misleading in debate.

When will your Clintonian deception end?

We aren’t talking about the worth of souls, we are talking about whether the Cardinal appears to value the souls of Gaza’s children over Israel’s. That appears to be the case based on his statements. THAT should disturb you, but that you choose to ignore the error of the Cardinal who is of your faith, and excuse his unequal treatment of God’s children shows that both you and the Cardinal do not really understand the faith to which you both belong.

You top it off by denigrating the faith of someone who seeks only honest debate.

Good job.


181 posted on 11/22/2012 6:15:57 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson