Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Customer Reviews Pagan Christianity?: Exploring the Roots of Our Church Practices
Amazon ^ | July 16, 2008 | The public

Posted on 01/21/2013 7:45:16 PM PST by narses

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: ravenwolf

I do believe it an obvious fact that sola scriptura is neither scriptural nor practical - it fails its own test and fails in practice by producing multiple contradicting doctrines.


61 posted on 01/25/2013 6:12:15 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

In the end it becomes scripture according to each individual, the Christian faith according to each individual. We should agree that this is not what Christ intended.


We do agree that it is not What Christ intended.

(Gospel of Paul not Jesus)?

Maybe we see different on what the Gospel is.

The only Gospel Paul preached was the death and resurection of Jesus.

The letters Paul wrote to the Churches were in regards to how best maintain the Church in order to preach the gospel of Jesus.

Jesus said ( you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free )

What he told us is the Gospel.


I do believe it an obvious fact that sola scriptura is neither scriptural nor practical - it fails its own test and fails in practice by producing multiple contradicting doctrines.

That is why we need to keep our hearts and minds on the gospel, there is only one who spoke the Gospel.

Paul had a disagreement with Peter and Paul announced it to the world, Paul was a believer but he could have been mistaken, so yes, there is some scripture that i believe contradicts others, but i think it is much better to admit it rather than try to twist it around to where it fits some ones ideal as some do.

Some people try to see a strife between Paul and James about if we are saved by Grace or works, there are no disagreement between them because Paul is saying that we are not saved by the works of the law.

James is not talking about the works of the law but works of faith, i believe they are both right because they both came from what Jesus himself said.

Since i believe this thread is not about the Gospel but only about authority i will just say that if Paul had an axe to grind with Peter then some one was infalible.

If some one in the Church was infalible back then there is many more the same way to day, so i would say that if some one puts all of their faith in the doctrine of the Church that is fine but i only put my faith in the Gospel of Jesus.

And i can not see how any two people could have much of a disagreement on that with out qouting something that is not even Gospel.


62 posted on 01/26/2013 5:27:55 AM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

My mistake.
Since i believe this thread is not about the Gospel but only about authority i will just say that if Paul had an axe to grind with Peter then some one was infalible.

I should have said falible not infalible, those are not familiar words for me, so instead of using them i should have said some one was mistaken or wrong.


63 posted on 01/26/2013 7:02:32 AM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf; D-fendr

II Timothy 2:15 is your friend. And the answer to your conundrum.


64 posted on 01/26/2013 7:05:41 AM PST by smvoice (Better Buck up, Buttercup. The wailing and gnashing are for an eternity..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

II Timothy 2:15 is your friend. And the answer to your conundrum.


I don,t know what conundrum is but i thank i can say amen to that.


65 posted on 01/26/2013 7:57:10 AM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
Maybe we see different on what the Gospel is.

My main point here is that important doctrine is derived from the same scripture differently by different denominations - as in the non-trinitarian, salvation by elections, etc. examples I gave earlier.

The only Gospel Paul preached was the death and resurection of Jesus.

There are a great many who would disagree with you - giving scripture as their proof vs. your view.

So, I'm not arguing here one interpretation or another only illustrating how sola scriptura fails in practice to result in "one Lord, one faith, one baptism." It does so because it becomes a matter individual authority.

We do agree that it is not What Christ intended.

Ergo, sola scriptura is not what He intended, not the Church He established.

When Peter and Paul disagreed they met in council with other apostles and resolved their differences - with authority for the Church.

Thank you very much for your reply and courteous discussion.

66 posted on 01/26/2013 3:17:43 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

There are a great many who would disagree with you - giving scripture as their proof vs. your view.


You are most likely right about that, i was just remembering Paul preaching the resurection but could not remember any thing else.

As for Pauls Accusation against Peter, i have not saw where it was settled, maybe it is because i put more stock in the Gospel of jesus and miss some of the other.

In other words i truly need that Gospel, those simple little things that Jesus said for me to do, they are so simple but so many people do not do them, myself included.


Thank you very much for your reply and courteous discussion.

Thanyou very much also.


67 posted on 01/26/2013 7:46:49 PM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
Maybe we can end also with a point of complete agreement.

I truly need that Gospel, those simple little things that Jesus said for me to do, they are so simple but so many people do not do them, myself included.

Amen. And may God bless you and yours.

Thank you very much.

68 posted on 01/26/2013 8:08:44 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Maybe we can end also with a point of complete agreement.


We agree on that point.

God bless.


69 posted on 01/27/2013 7:31:59 AM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson