Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Catholics hope new “progressive” Pope will convene Vatican III
LSN ^ | Ben Johnson

Posted on 02/12/2013 12:30:39 PM PST by Morgana

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: forgotten man

I’m not Catholic, but I have to say this is why the Church must completely reject such groups. If they don’t believe in the teachings of a certain faith, why are they in it? Why try to change it, other than for suspect purposes? It would be like me, being a Baptist, joining a Mormon Temple, and then trying to change everything they teach.


21 posted on 02/12/2013 1:01:21 PM PST by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that homosexual activities constitute “grave depravity...Under no circumstances can they be approved.”

Oh, it's worse than that. The old Baltimore Catechism called it a sin that cried out to heaven for vengeance.

Head for the hills. Don't look back.

22 posted on 02/12/2013 1:03:46 PM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
In their perverted dreams.
23 posted on 02/12/2013 1:05:31 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

“Then I guess all those priests who molested kids must have been straight”

Nice try, but that’s not what I meant.

Try a little critical thinking.


24 posted on 02/12/2013 1:05:39 PM PST by MichaelCorleone (A return to Jesus and prayer in the schools is the only way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
I strongly believe our high tide water mark was World War II and it’s amazing aftermath.

The country had voted for FDR 4 times starting in 1932. That was the beginning of the decline. FDR was even more radical than Obama - much more along the lines of Hugo Chavez. Read FDR's second bill of rights to get an idea of what he really was. Thankfully FDR died and we were spared the kind of socialism he really believed in. America did well for awhile post WW2 because the rest of the industrialized world was destroyed. Once we had to actually compete it became obvious the policies this country had put in place were a disaster - along with the bloated, corrupt labor unions that were saddling much of industry with an extra layer of bureaucracy.

25 posted on 02/12/2013 1:06:31 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

translation: people living in sin would rather change the church than themselves.


26 posted on 02/12/2013 1:07:34 PM PST by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

"YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT ADULTERY"

It ain't complicated

27 posted on 02/12/2013 1:08:59 PM PST by Gay State Conservative ("Progressives" toss the word "racist" around like chimps toss their feces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

28 posted on 02/12/2013 1:09:09 PM PST by marshmallow (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Catholic Homosexuals?
If the Catholic Church teaches the word of God then these folks are open sinners basically wanting their sin to be authorized by the new Pope.


29 posted on 02/12/2013 1:09:21 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the American Revolution 2013 and the Crusades 2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

If the next Pope DOES those things he will be the “Last Pope”.


30 posted on 02/12/2013 1:09:31 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Never on my watch

“Do they really believe the church will bless anal matrimony?”

Butt-hole-y matrimony? too far?


31 posted on 02/12/2013 1:10:34 PM PST by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

“gay Catholic? No such reality.”

There are plenty of pro-abortion, liberal Catholics. No excommunication for Nancy Pelosi... that’s a sad reality.


32 posted on 02/12/2013 1:12:29 PM PST by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Yes, the “all about me” gays who think the whole world revolves around them and their narcissistic behaviors.


33 posted on 02/12/2013 1:13:06 PM PST by MissesBush (The Fourth Estate has Become a Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCW
There are many married men who are involuntarily "attracted" to women other than their wives, but that is not called adultery: it's called "temptation."

Thre are many people who are "attracted" to more calories a day than they can healthily ingest, but that is not called gluttony, it's called "temptation."

And there are men who are "attracted" to men, and women who are "attracted" to women, but that is not called sodomy: it's called "temptation".

"Temptation" becomes sin only when it is deliberately entertained or indulged; not when it is resisted.

People attracted to the same sex can indeed be Christians and can indeed lead lives of heroic virtue and be saints. This is by the grace of God, in which they struggle to resist sins of thought, word, and deed.

As must we all, every day of our lives. Because the attractions are all around us. It's called "temptation".

34 posted on 02/12/2013 1:14:23 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Benedictus qui venit in Nomine Domini.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
End times! We’re livin’ in end times!

The last Trial of The Church in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth.

We wait in joyful hope for the second coming of Our Lord and Savior to judge the living and the dead.

35 posted on 02/12/2013 1:20:08 PM PST by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“Homosexual Catholic groups hope after Pope Benedict XVI steps down, a new “progressive” Pope will champion LGBT issues, female ordination, and contraception at a Third Vatican Council.”

Not a chance in hell which is where they are all going.


36 posted on 02/12/2013 1:21:29 PM PST by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Thanks for mentioning contraception. It is a thoroughly un-Biblical, un-Godly practice. There is no warrant for it in Scripture, and the first man reported as committing contraception in the history of the human race was condemned by God (Genesis 38:8-10). And it is similar to homosexuality, because it is choosing to intentionally split sexuality away from its created nature and structure.

A thoughtful gay writer, Richard Rodriguez, notes that "Contracepting couples are heterosexual gays."

37 posted on 02/12/2013 1:22:36 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Benedictus qui venit in Nomine Domini.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

In those days, we were still an united, Christian country. Just check out the movies once the Hayes Commission came into being. (And I speak as a pre-code fan!) Today, we are fractured and contemptous of religion. Very different from FDR - and I basically agree with you.


38 posted on 02/12/2013 1:23:37 PM PST by miss marmelstein ( Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Clock King

Unfortunately, Francis Cardinal Arinze is now 80 years old. Pope Benedict XVI was already 78 when elected and he has run out of steam at age 86. How many of us work until we’re 86?

Are the disgusting Rainbow Sash buttpeople still out there? And why do they assume that Third World cardinals are likely to be sexual liberation radicals?


39 posted on 02/12/2013 1:23:40 PM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I would say: “If the next Pope DOES those things, THE POPE BEFORE HIM would have been the “Last Pope”.


40 posted on 02/12/2013 1:25:50 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Benedictus qui venit in Nomine Domini.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson