Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
Bishop Edward Slattery of Tulsa has argued that the change towards Versus populum has had a number of unforeseen and largely negative effects. First of all, he says “it was a serious rupture with the Church’s ancient tradition. Secondly, it can give the appearance that the priest and the people were engaged in a conversation about God, rather than the worship of God. Thirdly, it places an inordinate importance on the personality of the celebrant by placing him on a kind of liturgical stage”.[12]

-Wiki

7 posted on 03/03/2013 11:36:21 AM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by Nature, not Nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: steve86

I agree with that, especially the “conversing about God” part. Instead of us all worshipping God together, the priest becomes the center of attention.

Pope Benedict, when he was Cardinal Ratzinger, said that this was the worst post-conciliatory mistake, or something to that effect.


25 posted on 03/03/2013 3:32:41 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: steve86

Right. Formerly, we saw the back of the priest and where there was no sermon, you barely saw his face. Of course, I liked the dialogue mass where the congregation was in effect the choir.


33 posted on 03/04/2013 4:47:57 AM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson