Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most Holy Redeemer Parishioners Force Removal of Picture of Pope-Emeritus Benedict
A Shepherd's Voice ^ | 3/4/13 | Gibbons J. Cooney

Posted on 03/07/2013 6:41:59 AM PST by marshmallow

From Fr. Brian Costello's pastor's message in the Most Holy Redeemer parish bulletin of March 3, 2013:

“Two weeks ago, after Pope Benedict XVI had announced to the world that he would be resigning the office of Peter as of February 28th, I put the Pope’s picture, that usually hangs in the rectory, in the church. A handful of people told me that they would rather it not be there. They explained that the feeling was while he was Pope, as well as his time as a Cardinal, Pope Benedict had made hurtful and hateful statements regarding the LGBT Community and thus, his picture should not be placed on the altar of MHR. I was also warned, many parishioners would walk out of Sunday Mass if the picture was not removed. I spoke with a close priest friend of mine, and even though both of us were saddened by this, the wisest course, I felt, was to remove the Pope’s picture.”

Who would have thought that parishioners in a Roman Catholic church would demand the removal of a picture of the Supreme Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church? Well, we pretty much did, and back in 2007, we told you so.

Fr. Costello may not have realized it, but by putting a picture of the pope in Most Holy Redeemer Church, he was committing an inadvertent act of blasphemy. On August 28, 2007 we reviewed Fr. Donal Godfrey, SJ’s just-released book Gays and Grays: The Story of the Inclusion of the Gay Community at Most Holy Redeemer Catholic Parish. We wrote that Fr. Godfrey’s book “…shows that the authentic community-forming experience at Most Holy Redeemer Parish in San Francisco is not Catholicism, but homosexuality. Existentially, Most Holy Redeemer is not a Catholic parish. It is not a Christian parish. It.......

(Excerpt) Read more at johnmalloysdb.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Ministry/Outreach; Theology
KEYWORDS: benedict; homosexualagenda; religiousleft

1 posted on 03/07/2013 6:42:01 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Homosexuals are bigots.


2 posted on 03/07/2013 6:46:39 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Unbelivable.


3 posted on 03/07/2013 6:47:28 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

4 posted on 03/07/2013 6:54:58 AM PST by Old Sarge (We are officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

Not surprised right now, taking adantage of a Church in transiton.

It will be interesting when there is a new Pope, one who could very well be very strict. Will these radicals experince their heads exploding? SARC.


5 posted on 03/07/2013 6:58:57 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

IF the didn’t like Benedict then I suspect they won’t like the next one either.


6 posted on 03/07/2013 7:01:51 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
"Who would have thought that parishioners in a Roman Catholic church would demand the removal of a picture of the Supreme Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church?"

I find it even more shocking the shepherds of this "church" would comply with this demand.

7 posted on 03/07/2013 7:09:19 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
This church is in the Castro district of San Francisco.

The objection is unsurprising and the capitulation is disedifying.

8 posted on 03/07/2013 7:10:50 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

So.....Faggies rule. The Gaystapo bigots strike again.

Who CARES what certain people think just because of the way they have sex!!!?

They probably threatened to vandalize the portrait of Benedict, the church itself, or both.

Disgusting.


9 posted on 03/07/2013 7:41:26 AM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Archbishop Cordileone to the rescue! But in his own time.


10 posted on 03/07/2013 7:43:08 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Sickening. I would have left it there and invited the fags and their supporters to leave.


11 posted on 03/07/2013 7:43:48 AM PST by pgkdan ( "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Is there something wrong with the local ordinary removing this pastor, mandating the picture remain, and telling the LGBT community that they are wrong now, were wrong before, and will continue to be wrong; so either change or be excommunicated.

Deacon Francis

PS: These people are remnants of Sodom and Gomorrah and few will change. They are constantly pushing heretical ideas and ideals and work AGAINST the Holy Spirit. We've coddled them long enough.

12 posted on 03/07/2013 7:51:23 AM PST by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

The homo-mafia and the humanist global commies might own the next Pope. We’ll see.

I can see it going either way - reform and the removal of homos, communists and their pervert, evil sympathizers and ideology from power or a doubling down on evil until God pops and drains the puss from the absess. That will be a more painful way to go.


13 posted on 03/07/2013 8:08:16 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson
The homo-mafia and the humanist global commies might own the next Pope. We’ll see.

Then it could split the church. If the next pope begins to change what Benedict and John Paul II put in place then for the first time in hundreds of years we'll have a living predecessor for people to rally around as the 'real pope'. The potential for schism is there, and I can't believe the Cardinals in the conclave aren't thinking along those lines.

14 posted on 03/07/2013 8:31:29 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Doubt that will happen.


15 posted on 03/07/2013 8:51:08 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Most of the cardinals that are around have been appointed by both JP2 and B16 so they are going to be much, much more conservative.


16 posted on 03/07/2013 9:06:37 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Statements described as “hurtful” and “hateful.”

But they didn’t say untrue.


17 posted on 03/07/2013 11:14:18 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

But first, a drink or two.


18 posted on 03/07/2013 11:15:13 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson