1 posted on
05/14/2013 5:15:11 AM PDT by
NYer
To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; SumProVita; ...
2 posted on
05/14/2013 5:15:30 AM PDT by
NYer
(Beware the man of a single book - St. Thomas Aquinas)
To: NYer
Allow me to “jump to conclusions”....
Because the Bishop doesn’t want contribute to any potential drum beat to increase the availability of TLM.
3 posted on
05/14/2013 5:35:02 AM PDT by
G Larry
(Darkness Hates the Light)
To: NYer
You would think they would be HAPPY to accomodate people who WANT to go to mass
4 posted on
05/14/2013 5:45:54 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
To: NYer
Fr. Z Nailed it.
1) Don't assume you know why a Bishop legitimately refuses a priest from outside his diocese to say regular masses like a pastor in one of his parishes.
2) Speculating (read gossip or detraction) without knowledge can actually do harm to the priest.
5 posted on
05/14/2013 5:48:47 AM PDT by
Bayard
To: NYer
Father Z is making more idle speculations than anyone else.
Reader should find an FSSP or, fail that, an SSPX parish. And make your offerings there.
7 posted on
05/14/2013 9:20:32 AM PDT by
steve86
(Acerbic by Nature, not Nurture™)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson